• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评价金标准框架对养老院临终关怀协作的影响:定性和定量评价。

An evaluation of the impact of the Gold Standards Framework on collaboration in end-of-life care in nursing homes. A qualitative and quantitative evaluation.

机构信息

School of Health and Population Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, 52 Pritchatts Road, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Int J Nurs Stud. 2012 May;49(5):586-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.10.021. Epub 2011 Nov 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.10.021
PMID:22130508
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the United Kingdom approaching 20% of people aged 85 years and over live in care homes and most will die there. Improving end-of-life care is a government health priority and homes may work with primary care staff and specialist palliative practitioners to provide comprehensive end-of-life care. Consequently effective collaboration between care home and health service practitioners is vital to ensure high quality end-of-life care.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the impact of a training programme to improve end-of-life care in nursing homes, on collaboration between nursing home staff and other health practitioners.

DESIGN

Evaluation using survey methods and qualitative case studies.

PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING

All 95 nursing homes in the first national 'Gold Standards Framework in Care Homes' programme in England were invited to participate in the evaluation.

METHODS

A survey of homes' characteristics, the approaches to end-of-life care, and liaison with other services, was completed pre and post programme implementation. Case studies were conducted in a sub-sample of 10 homes to provide important context and depth to the evaluation.

RESULTS

Pre and post surveys were returned by 49 (52%) homes. Improved collaborations as a result of the programme were anticipated by 31% of managers. Challenges to collaboration included working with large numbers of general practitioners, out-of-hours services and access to specialist practitioners. Improved collaborations between home staff and health service practitioners were identified by 33% of managers as one of the main programme outcomes. Staff reported increased knowledge of end-of-life care, and enhanced confidence, which in turn resulted in improved communication and collaboration. Post-programme, staff felt more confident initiating contact and discussing residents' end-of-life care with general practitioners and those working in specialist palliative care services.

CONCLUSIONS

The Gold Standards Framework in Care Homes programme can contribute towards end-of-life care by helping to improve the quality and quantity of communication and collaboration between nursing home staff and primary care and specialist practitioners. Further research is needed to determine why this was not consistent across all homes.

摘要

背景

在英国,近 20%的 85 岁及以上的老年人居住在养老院,其中大多数人将在那里去世。改善临终关怀是英国政府的一项卫生重点,养老院可能会与初级保健人员和专科姑息治疗从业者合作,提供全面的临终关怀。因此,养老院和卫生服务从业者之间的有效合作对于确保高质量的临终关怀至关重要。

目的

评估一项培训计划对改善养老院临终关怀的效果,以及该计划对养老院工作人员与其他卫生从业者之间合作的影响。

设计

使用调查方法和定性案例研究进行评估。

参与者和设置

英格兰首个全国性的“金标准框架在养老院”计划中的所有 95 家养老院都被邀请参与评估。

方法

在计划实施前后,对养老院的特点、临终关怀方法以及与其他服务的联络情况进行了调查。在一个亚样本的 10 个养老院进行了案例研究,为评估提供了重要的背景和深度。

结果

有 49 家(52%)养老院完成了预调查和后调查。31%的管理人员预计该计划会改善合作。合作面临的挑战包括与大量全科医生、非工作时间服务和获得专科医生的机会有关。33%的管理人员将养老院工作人员与卫生服务从业者之间的更好合作确定为该计划的主要成果之一。工作人员报告说,他们对临终关怀的了解有所增加,信心也有所增强,这反过来又促进了沟通和合作。在计划实施后,工作人员感到更有信心与全科医生以及从事专科姑息治疗服务的人员就居民的临终关怀问题主动联系并进行讨论。

结论

“金标准框架在养老院”计划可以通过帮助改善养老院工作人员与初级保健和专科从业者之间的沟通和合作的质量和数量,为临终关怀做出贡献。需要进一步的研究来确定为什么并非所有养老院都能从中受益。

相似文献

1
An evaluation of the impact of the Gold Standards Framework on collaboration in end-of-life care in nursing homes. A qualitative and quantitative evaluation.评价金标准框架对养老院临终关怀协作的影响:定性和定量评价。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2012 May;49(5):586-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.10.021. Epub 2011 Nov 29.
2
An evaluation of the implementation of a programme to improve end-of-life care in nursing homes.评估一项旨在改善养老院临终关怀服务的计划的实施情况。
Palliat Med. 2009 Sep;23(6):502-11. doi: 10.1177/0269216309105893. Epub 2009 May 28.
3
The effect of using high facilitation when implementing the Gold Standards Framework in Care Homes programme: a cluster randomised controlled trial.在养老院实施黄金标准框架计划时采用高度便利化的效果:一项整群随机对照试验。
Palliat Med. 2014 Oct;28(9):1099-109. doi: 10.1177/0269216314539785. Epub 2014 Jun 18.
4
Using Palliative Care Needs Rounds in the UK for care home staff and residents: an implementation science study.在英国,使用姑息治疗需求评估小组为养老院工作人员和居民提供服务:一项实施科学研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jul;12(19):1-134. doi: 10.3310/KRWQ5829.
5
The integrated implementation of two end-of-life care tools in nursing care homes in the UK: an in-depth evaluation.英国护理院中两种终末期关怀工具的综合实施:深入评估。
Palliat Med. 2010 Dec;24(8):828-38. doi: 10.1177/0269216310373162. Epub 2010 Jul 27.
6
Improving end of life care in care homes; an evaluation of the six steps to success programme.改善养老院的临终关怀;“成功六步法”项目评估
BMC Palliat Care. 2016 Jun 3;15:53. doi: 10.1186/s12904-016-0123-6.
7
Facilitation of an end-of-life care programme into practice within UK nursing care homes: A mixed-methods study.将终末期关怀方案融入英国护理养老院实践:一项混合方法研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Jun;82:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.02.004. Epub 2018 Feb 24.
8
A survey of issues of ethnicity and culture in nursing homes in an English region: nurse managers' perspectives.一项关于英国某地区养老院中种族和文化问题的调查:护士管理者的观点。
J Clin Nurs. 2012 Jun;21(11-12):1726-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03880.x. Epub 2012 Jan 9.
9
Supporting quality improvement in care homes for older people: the contribution of primary care nurses.支持改善老年人护理院的护理质量:初级护理护士的贡献。
J Nurs Manag. 2008 Mar;16(2):115-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2007.00838.x.
10
Ethical challenges in the provision of end-of-life care in Norwegian nursing homes.挪威养老院临终关怀服务中的伦理挑战。
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Aug;71(4):677-84. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.03.059. Epub 2010 May 26.

引用本文的文献

1
'I don't think they really link together, do they?' An ethnography of multi-professional involvement in advance care planning in nursing homes.“我不认为它们真的有联系,不是吗?”养老院多专业参与预先医疗照护计划的民族志研究。
Age Ageing. 2023 Dec 1;52(12). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afad234.
2
Factors that influence the implementation of innovation in aged care: a scoping review.影响老年护理创新实施的因素:一项范围综述
JBI Evid Implement. 2023 Dec 29;22(1):61-80. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000407.
3
Identifying Nursing Home Residents with Unmet Palliative Care Needs: A Systematic Review of Screening Tool Measurement Properties.
识别未满足的姑息治疗需求的养老院居民:筛查工具测量特性的系统评价。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2023 May;24(5):619-628.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2023.02.112. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
4
Perceptions of healthcare professional about the "PACE Steps to Success" palliative care program for long-term care: A qualitative study in Switzerland.医护人员对“PACE 迈向成功”长期护理姑息治疗方案的看法:瑞士的一项定性研究。
Nurs Open. 2023 Jul;10(7):4413-4423. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1683. Epub 2023 Feb 25.
5
General practitioners' role in improving health care in care homes: a realist review.全科医生在改善养老院医疗保健中的作用:一个实际主义综述。
Fam Pract. 2023 Feb 9;40(1):119-127. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmac071.
6
Report of the Lancet Commission on the Value of Death: bringing death back into life.《柳叶刀》死亡价值委员会报告:让死亡回归生命。
Lancet. 2022 Feb 26;399(10327):837-884. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02314-X. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
7
Context and mechanisms that enable implementation of specialist palliative care Needs Rounds in care homes: results from a qualitative interview study.养老院中促成实施专科姑息治疗需求轮诊的背景和机制:一项定性访谈研究的结果
BMC Palliat Care. 2021 Jul 22;20(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12904-021-00812-4.
8
Palliative and end-of-life care in care homes: protocol for codesigning and implementing an appropriate scalable model of Needs Rounds in the UK.安养院的姑息治疗和终末期关怀:在英国共同设计和实施适当的、可扩展的需求评估轮模型的方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 22;11(2):e049486. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049486.
9
Associations between Length of Stay in Long Term Care Facilities and End of Life Care. Analysis of the PACE Cross-Sectional Study.长期护理机构住院时间与临终关怀的关联。PACE 横断面研究分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 16;17(8):2742. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082742.
10
Strategies for the implementation of palliative care education and organizational interventions in long-term care facilities: A scoping review.长期护理机构中姑息治疗教育和组织干预措施的实施策略:范围综述。
Palliat Med. 2020 May;34(5):558-570. doi: 10.1177/0269216319893635. Epub 2020 Feb 3.