Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Dec;140(6):856-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.05.021.
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency of dental anomalies in orthodontic patients with different patterns of third-molar agenesis, comparing them with patients without third-molar agenesis. METHODS: A sample of 374 patients with agenesis of at least 1 third molar was divided into 4 groups according to the third-molar agenesis pattern, and a control group of 98 patients without third-molar agenesis was randomly selected from the patient archives. Panoramic radiographs and cast models were used to determine the associated dental anomalies, such as hypodontia, hyperdontia, impaction, dilaceration, microdontia, ectopic eruption, transposition, and transmigration. The Pearson chi-square and Fisher exact tests were used to determine the differences in the distribution of the associated dental anomalies among the groups. RESULTS: The prevalence of agenesis of other teeth (11.2%, n = 42) was significantly greater in our study sample (groups 1-4) than in the control group (group 5) (4.1%, n = 4; P <0.05). When we compared the groups according to the various third-molar agenesis patterns, we found that agenesis of other teeth was more common in patients with agenesis of 3 and 4 third molars. In addition, the patients with agenesis of 4 third molars exhibited maxillary lateral-incisor microdontia more frequently. Another important finding was a higher prevalence of total dental anomalies in patients with agenesis of 3 and 4 third molars compared with the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Permanent tooth agenesis, microdontia of maxillary lateral incisors, and total dental anomalies are more frequently associated with agenesis of 4 third molars than with the presence of third molars.
引言:本研究旨在调查不同类型第三磨牙缺失患者中牙齿异常的发生频率,并与无第三磨牙缺失的患者进行比较。
方法:从患者档案中随机选择 98 名无第三磨牙缺失的患者作为对照组,将至少有 1 颗第三磨牙缺失的 374 名患者样本根据第三磨牙缺失模式分为 4 组。使用全景片和模型来确定相关的牙齿异常,如缺牙、多生牙、阻生、扭转、过小牙、异位萌出、错位和迁移。使用 Pearson 卡方检验和 Fisher 确切概率法来确定各组之间相关牙齿异常的分布差异。
结果:在我们的研究样本(组 1-4)中,其他牙齿缺失的发生率(11.2%,n=42)明显高于对照组(组 5)(4.1%,n=4;P<0.05)。当我们根据各种第三磨牙缺失模式对组进行比较时,发现缺失 3 颗和 4 颗第三磨牙的患者中其他牙齿缺失更为常见。此外,缺失 4 颗第三磨牙的患者上颌侧切牙较小牙的发生率更高。另一个重要发现是,缺失 3 颗和 4 颗第三磨牙的患者总牙异常的发生率高于对照组。
结论:与存在第三磨牙相比,第三磨牙完全缺失、上颌侧切牙过小牙和总牙异常与第三磨牙缺失更为相关。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011-12
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015-11
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010-6
Angle Orthod. 2010-11
Acta Odontol Scand. 2017-4
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002-12
Biology (Basel). 2022-11-28
Clin Oral Investig. 2023-3
Arch Oral Biol. 2018-1-19