Suppr超能文献

巴西版 Alberta 婴儿运动量表的验证。

Brazilian validation of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale.

机构信息

Department of Physical Therapy, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

出版信息

Phys Ther. 2012 Mar;92(3):440-7. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20110036. Epub 2011 Dec 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) is a well-known motor assessment tool used to identify potential delays in infants' motor development. Although Brazilian researchers and practitioners have used the AIMS in laboratories and clinical settings, its translation to Portuguese and validation for the Brazilian population is yet to be investigated.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to translate and validate all AIMS items with respect to internal consistency and content, criterion, and construct validity.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional and longitudinal design was used.

METHODS

A cross-cultural translation was used to generate a Brazilian-Portuguese version of the AIMS. In addition, a validation process was conducted involving 22 professionals and 766 Brazilian infants (aged 0-18 months).

RESULTS

The results demonstrated language clarity and internal consistency for the motor criteria (motor development score, α=.90; prone, α=.85; supine, α=.92; sitting, α=.84; and standing, α=.86). The analysis also revealed high discriminative power to identify typical and atypical development (motor development score, P<.001; percentile, P=.04; classification criterion, χ(2)=6.03; P=.05). Temporal stability (P=.07) (rho=.85, P<.001) was observed, and predictive power (P<.001) was limited to the group of infants aged from 3 months to 9 months.

LIMITATIONS

Limited predictive validity was observed, which may have been due to the restricted time that the groups were followed longitudinally.

CONCLUSIONS

In sum, the translated version of AIMS presented adequate validity and reliability.

摘要

背景

艾伯特婴儿运动量表(AIMS)是一种广为人知的运动评估工具,用于发现婴儿运动发育迟缓的潜在问题。虽然巴西的研究人员和从业者已经在实验室和临床环境中使用了 AIMS,但对其进行葡萄牙语翻译并验证其在巴西人群中的适用性仍有待研究。

目的

本研究旨在对 AIMS 的所有项目进行翻译和验证,以评估其内部一致性、内容、标准和结构效度。

设计

本研究采用了横断和纵向设计。

方法

使用跨文化翻译方法生成 AIMS 的巴西葡萄牙语版本。此外,还对 22 名专业人员和 766 名巴西婴儿(0-18 个月)进行了验证过程。

结果

结果表明,运动标准的语言清晰度和内部一致性良好(运动发育评分,α=.90;俯卧位,α=.85;仰卧位,α=.92;坐位,α=.84;站位,α=.86)。分析还表明,该量表具有较高的鉴别力,能够识别典型和非典型发育(运动发育评分,P<.001;百分位数,P=.04;分类标准,χ(2)=6.03;P=.05)。还观察到了时间稳定性(P=.07)(rho=.85,P<.001),但预测能力(P<.001)仅限于 3 至 9 个月的婴儿组。

局限性

观察到预测效度有限,这可能是由于各组纵向随访的时间限制。

结论

总之,翻译后的 AIMS 具有足够的有效性和可靠性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验