Suppr超能文献

中心主动脉血压、增强指数和反射波传导时间:示波法所获数据的可重复性和再现性

Central aortic blood pressure, augmentation index, and reflected wave transit time: reproducibility and repeatability of data obtained by oscillometry.

作者信息

Ageenkova Olga A, Purygina Marina A

机构信息

Department of Therapy, Functional and Ultrasound Diagnostics, Postgraduate Training Faculty of Smolensk State Medical Academy, Smolensk, Russian Federation.

出版信息

Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2011;7:649-56. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S24877. Epub 2011 Nov 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The evidence suggests that arterial stiffness acts as an independent predictor of general as well as cardiovascular mortality, strokes in patients with arterial hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus in the elderly, and in the general population. The oscillometric method measures parameters of arterial stiffness by applying special methods of processing oscillograms. This is a study of the reproducibility and repeatability of central aortic systolic blood pressure (SBP), augmentation index, and reflected wave transit time measured by Vasotens(®) technology.

METHODS

Anthropometric and hemodynamic measurements for 90 volunteers were made by two observers using the 24-hour blood pressure monitoring system, BPLab(®), with Vasotens technology in "office" mode, over a period of two days and always at the same time in the morning. Initialization of the device was performed prior to each measurement cycle for each participant.

RESULTS

Analysis of short-term repeatability and reproducibility data for central aortic systolic blood pressure, reflected wave transit time, and augmentation index did not reveal any statistically significant differences. For observer A, SBP was 0.11 ± 7.53 mmHg and aortic SBP was 0.26 ± 6.11 mmHg; for observer B, SBP was 0.14 ± 8.42 and aortic SBP was 0.2 ± 7.25 mmHg. Short-term reproducibility for the different observers with averaging of both measurements was 0.36 ± 5.69 mmHg for SBP and 0.37 ± 6.7 mmHg for aortic SBP; the next day, repeatability for observer A was 0.52 ± 10.7 mmHg for SBP and 0.73 ± 8.98 mmHg for aortic SBP.

CONCLUSION

BPLab with Vasotens technology has good reproducibility and repeatability, and can be recommended for clinical vascular risk estimation.

摘要

背景

有证据表明,动脉僵硬度是全因死亡率、心血管死亡率、动脉高血压患者中风、老年2型糖尿病以及普通人群中相关疾病的独立预测指标。示波法通过应用特殊的示波图处理方法来测量动脉僵硬度参数。本研究旨在探讨采用Vasotens(®)技术测量的中心主动脉收缩压(SBP)、增强指数和反射波传导时间的可重复性和重复性。

方法

90名志愿者的人体测量和血流动力学测量由两名观察者使用配备Vasotens技术的24小时血压监测系统BPLab(®),在“办公室”模式下,于两天内每天早晨同一时间进行。每次测量周期前,对每位参与者的设备进行初始化。

结果

对中心主动脉收缩压、反射波传导时间和增强指数的短期重复性和再现性数据分析未发现任何统计学上的显著差异。对于观察者A,收缩压为0.11±7.53 mmHg,主动脉收缩压为0.26±6.11 mmHg;对于观察者B,收缩压为0.14±8.42,主动脉收缩压为0.2±7.25 mmHg。不同观察者两次测量平均后的短期再现性,收缩压为0.36±5.69 mmHg,主动脉收缩压为0.37±6.7 mmHg;第二天,观察者A的重复性,收缩压为0.52±10.7 mmHg,主动脉收缩压为0.73±8.98 mmHg。

结论

配备Vasotens技术的BPLab具有良好的再现性和重复性,可推荐用于临床血管风险评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4fd/3225346/635776231035/vhrm-7-649f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验