Maastricht University, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Dept. of Health, Ethics & Society/Metamedica, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2012 Jan-Feb;35(1):11-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2011.11.001. Epub 2011 Dec 3.
In certain cases of chronic mental illness (for example bipolar disorder) a self-binding directive or Ulysses contract may be a helpful intervention to prevent harm to the person him- or herself and/or others. By choosing such an arrangement, the patient can indicate when and how mental health professionals may intervene against his or her will and provide indicated care which may lead to an improvement of the patient's mental condition. In the Netherlands, since 2008 the Compulsory Admissions Act has been amended and now includes a paragraph on self-binding. Starting from the Dutch debate and statutory regulation of self-binding in mental health care, a number of issues with broader relevance are discussed, particularly as these pertain to the legal regulation and juridification of self-binding. It is argued that too many detailed rules are a threat to increasing patient empowerment.
在某些慢性精神疾病的情况下(例如双相情感障碍),自我约束指令或尤利西斯契约可能是一种有用的干预措施,可以防止对患者本人和/或他人造成伤害。通过选择这样的安排,患者可以表明心理健康专业人员何时以及如何违背他或她的意愿进行干预,并提供可能导致患者精神状况改善的规定护理。在荷兰,自 2008 年以来,《强制入院法》已经修订,现在包括关于自我约束的一段。从荷兰在精神保健方面的自我约束的辩论和法定规定出发,讨论了一些具有更广泛相关性的问题,特别是因为这些问题涉及自我约束的法律规定和法律化。有人认为,过多的详细规则是对增加患者赋权的威胁。