Facultad de Odontología, Universidad de Sevilla, C/ Avicena s/n - 41009 Sevilla.
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012 Mar 1;17(2):e246-50. doi: 10.4317/medoral.17462.
The increase of aesthetic demands, together with the successful outcome of current implants, has renewed interest in the search for new materials with enough mechanical properties and better aesthetic qualities than the materials customarily used in implanto-prosthetic rehabilitation. Among these materials, zirconium has been used in different types of implants, including prosthetic abutments. The aim of the present review is to analyse current scientific evidence supporting the use of this material for the above mentioned purposes. We carried out the review of the literature published in the last ten years (2000 through 2010) of in vitro trials of dynamic and static loading of zirconium abutments found in the databases of Medline and Cochrane using the key words zirconium abutment, fracture resistance, fracture strength, cyclic loading. Although we have found a wide variability of values among the different studies, abutments show favourable clinical behaviour for the rehabilitation of single implants in the anterior area. Such variability may be explained by the difficulty to simulate daily mastication under in vitro conditions. The clinical evidence, as found in our study, does not recommend the use of implanto-prosthetic zirconium abutments in the molar area.
审美需求的增加,以及当前种植体成功的结果,使得人们对寻找新的材料产生了新的兴趣,这些材料需要具有足够的机械性能和比通常用于种植体修复的材料更好的美学质量。在这些材料中,氧化锆已被用于不同类型的植入物,包括修复体基台。本综述的目的是分析目前支持将这种材料用于上述目的的科学证据。我们对 Medline 和 Cochrane 数据库中过去十年(2000 年至 2010 年)发表的关于氧化锆基台的动态和静态加载的体外试验的文献进行了综述,使用的关键词是氧化锆基台、抗折强度、断裂强度、循环加载。尽管我们在不同的研究中发现了广泛的变化值,但基台在前牙区单个种植体修复方面表现出良好的临床行为。这种可变性可能是由于在体外条件下难以模拟日常咀嚼。正如我们的研究发现的那样,临床证据并不推荐在磨牙区使用种植体修复用氧化锆基台。