• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

锆种植体基台:断裂强度及循环载荷对固位螺钉松动的影响

Zirconium implant abutments: fracture strength and influence of cyclic loading on retaining-screw loosening.

作者信息

Gehrke Peter, Dhom Günter, Brunner Jochen, Wolf Dietrich, Degidi Marco, Piattelli Adriano

出版信息

Quintessence Int. 2006 Jan;37(1):19-26.

PMID:16429699
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the fracture strength of zirconium implant abutments and the torque required to unfasten the retaining screw before and after applying cyclic loading to the implant-abutment assembly. The dynamic behavior and stress distribution pattern of zirconium abutments were also evaluated.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Static and cyclic loading of 7 XiVE implants with straight Cercon zirconium abutments were simulated under worst-case conditions. Cyclic loading tests were performed via a servohydraulic dynamic testing machine at loads between 100 and 450 N, for up to 5 million loading cycles, at 15 Hz. The dynamic behavior of the zirconium abutments was analyzed by finite element modeling and Pro/Mechanica software, comparing van-der-Mises and maximum stress levels.

RESULTS

Cercon zirconium-ceramic abutments exhibited a maximum fracture strength of 672 N during static loading and 269 N at 800,000 to 5 million cycles runout point, and 403 N at 10,000 cycles runout point during cyclic loading. The mean torque value required to unfasten the abutment retaining screws after (initial) tightening was 21 Ncm +/- 1 and 20 Ncm +/- 1 (measurement accuracy +/- 2 Ncm) after loading with up to 5 million cycles respectively. Torque values decreased minimally and screw loosening did not occur. Within the limited number of test specimens (7), the difference was statistically significant (P = .015). FEM analysis displayed higher stress peaks up to 800 MPa at the cervical aspect of the zirconium abutment and at the apical third of its retaining screw at an external load of 250 N.

CONCLUSION

Within the limitations of this study, zirconium implant abutments exceeded the established values for maximum incisal bite forces reported in the literature and tightly fit into the titanium implant after several millions of loading cycles.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定锆种植体基台的断裂强度以及在对种植体-基台组件施加循环载荷前后松开固位螺钉所需的扭矩。还评估了锆基台的动态行为和应力分布模式。

方法和材料

在最坏情况下模拟了7个带有直型Cercon锆基台的XiVE种植体的静态和循环载荷。通过伺服液压动态试验机在100至450 N的载荷下进行循环载荷试验,频率为15 Hz,加载次数高达500万次。通过有限元建模和Pro/Mechanica软件分析锆基台的动态行为,比较范德米塞斯应力和最大应力水平。

结果

Cercon锆陶瓷基台在静态加载时的最大断裂强度为672 N,在80万至500万次循环的疲劳极限点为269 N,在循环加载1万次疲劳极限点时为403 N。在分别加载高达500万次循环后,(初始)拧紧后松开基台固位螺钉所需的平均扭矩值分别为21 Ncm±1和20 Ncm±1(测量精度±2 Ncm)。扭矩值下降极小且未发生螺钉松动。在有限数量的测试样本(7个)中,差异具有统计学意义(P = 0.015)。有限元分析显示,在250 N的外部载荷下,锆基台颈部和其固位螺钉根尖三分之一处的应力峰值高达800 MPa。

结论

在本研究的局限性范围内,锆种植体基台超过了文献中报道的最大切牙咬合力的既定值,并且在数百万次加载循环后与钛种植体紧密贴合。

相似文献

1
Zirconium implant abutments: fracture strength and influence of cyclic loading on retaining-screw loosening.锆种植体基台:断裂强度及循环载荷对固位螺钉松动的影响
Quintessence Int. 2006 Jan;37(1):19-26.
2
The dynamic natures of implant loading.种植体加载的动态特性。
J Prosthet Dent. 2009 Jun;101(6):359-71. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60079-2.
3
Screw stability of CAD-CAM titanium and zirconia abutments on different implants: An in vitro study.CAD-CAM 钛和氧化锆基台在不同种植体上的螺钉稳定性:一项体外研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2021 Jun;23(3):373-379. doi: 10.1111/cid.13001. Epub 2021 May 2.
4
Fracture resistance of titanium and zirconia abutments: an in vitro study.钛和氧化锆基台的抗折能力:一项体外研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2013 May;109(5):304-12. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60306-6.
5
Influence of Different Screw Torque Levels on the Biomechanical Behavior of Tapered Prosthetic Abutments.不同螺钉扭矩水平对锥形修复基台生物力学行为的影响。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 May/June;33(3):536–540. doi: 10.11607/jomi.5899. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
6
Wave analysis of implant screw loosening using an air cylindrical cyclic loading device.使用空气圆柱循环加载装置对种植体螺钉松动进行波形分析。
J Prosthet Dent. 2002 Oct;88(4):402-8. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2002.128099.
7
In vitro study of the influence of the type of connection on the fracture load of zirconia abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections.体外研究连接类型对内连接和外连接氧化锆基台的骨折负荷的影响。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 Sep-Oct;24(5):850-8.
8
Fracture strength of implant abutments after fatigue testing: A systematic review and a meta-analysis.疲劳测试后种植体基台的断裂强度:系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016 Sep;62:333-346. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.05.011. Epub 2016 May 14.
9
Does Abutment Collar Length Affect Abutment Screw Loosening After Cyclic Loading?基台颈环长度对循环加载后基台螺丝松动有影响吗?
J Oral Implantol. 2015 Jul;41 Spec No:346-51. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-D-14-00021.
10
Comparison of fracture resistance of pressable metal ceramic custom implant abutment with a commercially fabricated CAD/CAM zirconia implant abutment.比较可压金属陶瓷定制种植体基台与商业化 CAD/CAM 氧化锆种植体基台的抗折能力。
J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Nov;110(5):389-96. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.06.004. Epub 2013 Sep 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of fracture strength in implant supported zirconia-titanium base abutments.种植体支持的氧化锆-钛基台断裂强度的比较
Bioinformation. 2024 Jun 30;20(6):665-668. doi: 10.6026/973206300200665. eCollection 2024.
2
A comparative finite element analysis of titanium, poly-ether-etherketone, and zirconia abutment on stress distribution around maxillary anterior implants.钛、聚醚醚酮和氧化锆基台对上颌前牙种植体周围应力分布的比较有限元分析
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2024 Mar 26;21:22. eCollection 2024.
3
Finite Element Analysis and Fatigue Test of INTEGRA Dental Implant System.
INTEGRA牙科种植系统的有限元分析与疲劳测试
Materials (Basel). 2024 Mar 6;17(5):1213. doi: 10.3390/ma17051213.
4
In Vitro Analysis of the Removability of Fractured Prosthetic Screws within Endosseous Implants Using Conventional and Mechanical Techniques.使用传统技术和机械技术对骨内种植体中折断的修复螺丝的可取出性进行体外分析。
Materials (Basel). 2023 Nov 24;16(23):7317. doi: 10.3390/ma16237317.
5
Influence of the Peek Abutments on Mechanical Behavior of the Internal Connections Single Implant.Peek基台对单颗种植体内部连接机械性能的影响。
Materials (Basel). 2022 Nov 16;15(22):8133. doi: 10.3390/ma15228133.
6
Comparing the Fracture Resistance and Modes of Failure in Different Types of CAD/CAM Zirconia Abutments with Internal Hexagonal Implants: An In Vitro Study.不同类型带内六角种植体的CAD/CAM氧化锆基台的抗折性及失效模式比较:一项体外研究
Materials (Basel). 2022 Apr 4;15(7):2656. doi: 10.3390/ma15072656.
7
Optimized Planning and Evaluation of Dental Implant Fatigue Testing: A Specific Software Application.牙科种植体疲劳测试的优化规划与评估:一种特定的软件应用程序
Biology (Basel). 2020 Oct 31;9(11):372. doi: 10.3390/biology9110372.
8
Retention and Clinical Performance of Zirconia Crowns: A Comprehensive Review.氧化锆全冠的固位与临床性能:一项综述
Int J Dent. 2020 Oct 15;2020:8846534. doi: 10.1155/2020/8846534. eCollection 2020.
9
Microstructure and Porosity Evolution of the Ti-35Zr Biomedical Alloy Produced by Elemental Powder Metallurgy.通过元素粉末冶金制备的Ti-35Zr生物医学合金的微观结构与孔隙率演变
Materials (Basel). 2020 Oct 13;13(20):4539. doi: 10.3390/ma13204539.
10
Resistance to Fracture of Zirconia Abutments with Different Angulations: Impact of Implant Platform Diameter.不同角度氧化锆基台的抗断裂性:种植体平台直径的影响
Eur J Dent. 2020 Oct;14(4):517-524. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1709947. Epub 2020 Jul 9.