Suppr超能文献

桡神经麻痹肌腱转移术的疗效:三种方法的比较。

Outcome of tendon transfer for radial nerve paralysis: Comparison of three methods.

作者信息

Moussavi Alia Ayatollahi, Saied Alireza, Karbalaeikhani Ali

机构信息

Kerman Neuroscience Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Indian J Orthop. 2011 Nov;45(6):558-62. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.87133.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tendon transfer for radial nerve paralysis has a 100 years history and any set of tendons that can be considered to be useful has been utilized for the purpose. The pronator tress is used for restoration of wrist dorsiflexion, while the flexor carpi radialis, flexor carpiulnaris, and flexor digitorum superficialis are variably used in each for fingers and thumb movements. The present study was a retrospective analysis, designed to compare three methods of tendon transfer for radial nerve palsy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

41 patients with irreversible radial nerve paralysis, who had underwent three different types of tendon transfers (using different tendons for transfer) between March 2005 and September 2009, included in the study. The pronator teres was transferred for wrist extention. Flexor carpi ulnaris (group 1, n=18), flexor carpi radialis (group 2, n=10) and flexor digitorum superficialis (group 3, n=13) was used to achieve finger extention. Palmaris longus was used to achieve thumb extention and abduction. At the final examination, related ranges of motions were recorded and the patients were asked about their overall satisfaction with the operation, their ability, and time of return to their previous jobs, and in addition, disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) Score was measured and recorded for each patient.

RESULTS

The difference between the groups with regard to DASH score, ability, and time of return to job, satisfaction with the operation, and range of motions was not statistically significant (P>0.05). All of the patients had experienced functional improvement and overall satisfaction rate was 95%. No complication directly attributable to the operation was noted, except for proximal interphalangeal joint flexion contracture in three patents.

CONCLUSION

The tendon transfer for irreversible radial nerve palsy is very successful and probably the success is not related to type of tendon used for transfer.

摘要

背景

桡神经麻痹的肌腱转移已有100年历史,任何可被视为有用的肌腱组都已被用于此目的。旋前圆肌用于恢复腕背伸,而桡侧腕屈肌、尺侧腕屈肌和指浅屈肌在手指和拇指运动中各有不同应用。本研究为回顾性分析,旨在比较三种桡神经麻痹肌腱转移方法。

材料与方法

纳入2005年3月至2009年9月间接受三种不同类型肌腱转移(使用不同肌腱进行转移)的41例不可逆桡神经麻痹患者。将旋前圆肌转移用于腕背伸。使用尺侧腕屈肌(第1组,n = 18)、桡侧腕屈肌(第2组,n = 10)和指浅屈肌(第3组,n = 13)来实现手指背伸。使用掌长肌来实现拇指背伸和外展。在最终检查时,记录相关活动范围,并询问患者对手术的总体满意度、恢复原工作的能力和时间,此外,测量并记录每位患者的上肢、肩部和手部功能障碍(DASH)评分。

结果

各组在DASH评分、能力、恢复工作时间、手术满意度和活动范围方面的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。所有患者均有功能改善,总体满意率为95%。除3例患者出现近端指间关节屈曲挛缩外,未发现直接归因于手术的并发症。

结论

不可逆桡神经麻痹的肌腱转移非常成功,成功可能与用于转移的肌腱类型无关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f620/3227362/725728f746ee/IJOrtho-45-558-g004.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验