University of California, San Diego, CA 92093-0812, USA.
Child Maltreat. 2012 Feb;17(1):67-79. doi: 10.1177/1077559511426908. Epub 2011 Dec 5.
Many public sector service systems and provider organizations are in some phase of learning about or implementing evidence-based interventions. Child welfare service systems represent a context where implementation spans system, management, and organizational concerns. Research utilizing mixed methods that combine qualitative and quantitative design, data collection, and analytic approaches are particularly well suited to understanding both the process and outcomes of dissemination and implementation efforts in child welfare systems. This article describes the process of using mixed methods in implementation research and provides an applied example of an examination of factors impacting staff retention during an evidence-based intervention implementation in a statewide child welfare system. The authors integrate qualitative data with previously published quantitative analyses of job autonomy and staff turnover during this statewide implementation project in order to illustrate the utility of mixed method approaches in providing a more comprehensive understanding of opportunities and challenges in implementation research.
许多公共部门服务系统和服务提供者组织都处于了解或实施基于证据的干预措施的某个阶段。儿童福利服务系统是一个涉及系统、管理和组织问题的实施领域。利用混合方法的研究,结合定性和定量设计、数据收集和分析方法,特别适合于理解儿童福利系统中传播和实施工作的过程和结果。本文描述了在实施研究中使用混合方法的过程,并提供了一个应用实例,即检查全州范围内儿童福利系统实施基于证据的干预措施期间影响员工保留的因素。作者将定性数据与之前发表的关于全州实施项目中工作自主性和员工离职的定量分析相结合,以说明混合方法在提供对实施研究中的机遇和挑战的更全面理解方面的效用。