Hahn Jin-Oh, Reisner Andrew T, Jaffer Farouc A, Asada H Harry
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G2G8 Canada.
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2012 Mar;16(2):212-20. doi: 10.1109/TITB.2011.2177668. Epub 2011 Nov 29.
This paper presents a new approach to the estimation of unknown central aortic blood pressure waveform from a directly measured peripheral blood pressure waveform, in which a physics-based model is employed to solve for a subject- and state-specific individualized transfer function (ITF). The ITF provides the means to estimate the unknown central aortic blood pressure from the peripheral blood pressure. Initial proof-of-principle for the ITF is demonstrated experimentally through an in vivo protocol. In swine subjects taken through wide range of physiologic conditions, the ITF was on average able to provide central aortic blood pressure waveforms more accurately than a nonindividualized transfer function. Its usefulness was most evident when the subject's pulse transit time deviated from normative values. In these circumstances, the ITF yielded statistically significant reductions over a nonindividualized transfer function in the following three parameters: 1) 30% reduction in the root-mean-squared error between estimated versus actual central aortic blood pressure waveform (p < 10 (-4)), 2) >50% reduction in the error between estimated versus actual systolic and pulse pressures ( p < 10 (-4)), and 3) a reduction in the overall breakdown rate (i.e., the frequency of estimation errors >3 mmHg, p < 10 (-4)). In conclusion, the ITF may offer an attractive alternative to existing methods that estimates the central aortic blood pressure waveform, and may be particularly useful in nonnormative physiologic conditions.
本文提出了一种从直接测量的外周血压波形估计未知中心主动脉血压波形的新方法,该方法采用基于物理的模型来求解针对个体和状态的个性化传递函数(ITF)。ITF提供了从外周血压估计未知中心主动脉血压的方法。通过体内实验方案对ITF进行了初步原理验证。在经历广泛生理条件的猪受试者中,ITF平均能够比非个性化传递函数更准确地提供中心主动脉血压波形。当受试者的脉搏传输时间偏离正常值时,其效用最为明显。在这些情况下,与非个性化传递函数相比,ITF在以下三个参数上有统计学显著降低:1)估计的中心主动脉血压波形与实际波形之间的均方根误差降低30%(p < 10(-4)),2)估计的收缩压和脉压与实际值之间的误差降低>50%(p < 10(-4)),3)总体分解率降低(即估计误差>3 mmHg的频率,p < 10(-4))。总之,ITF可能为现有的估计中心主动脉血压波形的方法提供有吸引力的替代方案,并且在非标准生理条件下可能特别有用。