Department of Sociology and Center for Environmental Studies, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912, USA.
Environ Health Perspect. 2012 Mar;120(3):326-31. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1103734. Epub 2011 Dec 6.
Environmental health research involving community participation has increased substantially since the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) environmental justice and community-based participatory research (CBPR) partnerships began in the mid-1990s. The goals of these partnerships are to inform and empower better decisions about exposures, foster trust, and generate scientific knowledge to reduce environmental health disparities in low-income, minority communities. Peer-reviewed publication and clinical health outcomes alone are inadequate criteria to judge the success of projects in meeting these goals; therefore, new strategies for evaluating success are needed.
We reviewed the methods used to evaluate our project, "Linking Breast Cancer Advocacy and Environmental Justice," to help identify successful CBPR methods and to assist other teams in documenting effectiveness. Although our project precedes the development of the NIEHS Evaluation Metrics Manual, a schema to evaluate the success of projects funded through the Partnerships in Environmental Public Health (PEPH), our work reported here illustrates the record keeping and self-reflection anticipated in NIEHS's PEPH.
Evaluation strategies should assess how CBPR partnerships meet the goals of all partners. Our partnership, which included two strong community-based organizations, produced a team that helped all partners gain organizational capacity. Environmental sampling in homes and reporting the results of that effort had community education and constituency-building benefits. Scientific results contributed to a court decision that required cumulative impact assessment for an oil refinery and to new policies for chemicals used in consumer products. All partners leveraged additional funding to extend their work.
An appropriate evaluation strategy can demonstrate how CBPR projects can advance science, support community empowerment, increase environmental health literacy, and generate individual and policy action to protect health.
自国家环境卫生科学研究所(NIEHS)于 20 世纪 90 年代中期开始开展环境公正和基于社区的参与式研究(CBPR)伙伴关系以来,涉及社区参与的环境卫生研究大幅增加。这些伙伴关系的目标是为有关暴露的决策提供信息和赋权,增进信任,并生成科学知识,以减少低收入、少数族裔社区的环境健康差异。仅通过同行评审的出版物和临床健康结果来判断项目实现这些目标的成功是不够的;因此,需要新的策略来评估成功。
我们回顾了评估我们的项目“将乳腺癌倡导与环境公正联系起来”所使用的方法,以帮助确定成功的 CBPR 方法,并协助其他团队记录效果。尽管我们的项目早于 NIEHS 评估指标手册的制定,该手册是评估通过环境公共卫生伙伴关系(PEPH)资助的项目成功的方案,但我们在这里报告的工作说明了 NIEHS 的 PEPH 所预期的记录保存和自我反思。
评估策略应评估 CBPR 伙伴关系如何满足所有合作伙伴的目标。我们的伙伴关系包括两个强大的社区组织,培养了一个团队,帮助所有合作伙伴获得组织能力。家庭环境采样和报告该工作的结果具有社区教育和选民建设的好处。科学成果促成了一项法院裁决,要求对炼油厂进行累积影响评估,并为消费品中使用的化学品制定新政策。所有合作伙伴都利用额外的资金来扩展他们的工作。
适当的评估策略可以证明 CBPR 项目如何推进科学、支持社区赋权、提高环境健康素养,并产生个人和政策行动来保护健康。