• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Enhancing Community-Based Participatory Research Partnerships Through Appreciative Inquiry.通过肯定性探究加强基于社区的参与性研究伙伴关系。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2015 Autumn;9(3):457-63. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2015.0054.
2
The Development of a Collaborative Self-Evaluation Process for Community-Based Participatory Research Partnerships Using the Community-Based Participatory Research Conceptual Model and Other Adaptable Tools.利用基于社区的参与性研究概念模型和其他适用工具,为基于社区的参与性研究伙伴关系开发协作式自我评估过程。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2019;13(3):225-235. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2019.0050.
3
Establishing New Community-Based Participatory Research Partnerships using the Community-Based Participatory Research Charrette Model: Lessons from the Cancer Health Accountability for Managing Pain and Symptoms Study.使用基于社区的参与式研究工作坊模式建立新的基于社区的参与式研究伙伴关系:癌症疼痛和症状管理健康问责制研究的经验教训。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2018;12(1):89-99. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2018.0010.
4
Perceptions of Empowerment Within and Across Partnerships in Community-Based Participatory Research: A Dyadic Interview Analysis.社区参与式研究中伙伴关系内部及跨伙伴关系的赋权认知:二元访谈分析
Qual Health Res. 2016 Jan;26(1):105-16. doi: 10.1177/1049732315577606. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
5
A capacity building program to promote CBPR partnerships between academic researchers and community members.一个能力建设项目,旨在促进学术研究人员和社区成员之间的 CBPR 伙伴关系。
Clin Transl Sci. 2011 Dec;4(6):428-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2011.00362.x. Epub 2011 Nov 22.
6
A conceptual framework for evaluating health equity promotion within community-based participatory research partnerships.一个用于评估基于社区的参与性研究伙伴关系中健康公平促进情况的概念框架。
Eval Program Plann. 2018 Oct;70:25-34. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.04.014. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
7
A realist evaluation of community-based participatory research: partnership synergy, trust building and related ripple effects.基于社区参与式研究的现实主义评价:伙伴关系协同效应、信任建立及相关连锁反应。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Jul 30;15:725. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1949-1.
8
Participatory evaluation of a community-academic partnership to inform capacity-building and sustainability.社区-学术伙伴关系的参与式评估,以指导能力建设和可持续性发展。
Eval Program Plann. 2015 Oct;52:19-26. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2015.03.005. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
9
Measuring the success of community science: the northern California Household Exposure Study.衡量社区科学的成功:北加利福尼亚家庭暴露研究。
Environ Health Perspect. 2012 Mar;120(3):326-31. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1103734. Epub 2011 Dec 6.
10
Measuring Community-Based Participatory Research Partnerships: The Initial Development of an Assessment Instrument.衡量基于社区的参与性研究伙伴关系:一种评估工具的初步开发。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2015 Winter;9(4):549-60. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2015.0077.

引用本文的文献

1
Antiracism in appreciative inquiry: Generative tensions and collective reflexivity.赏识性探询中的反种族主义:生成性张力与集体反思
Action Res (Lond). 2024 Dec;22(4):345-361. doi: 10.1177/14767503231210418. Epub 2023 Nov 3.
2
Process evaluation of an academic-community-government partnership to reduce liver diseases attributable to hepatitis B virus.学术-社区-政府合作减少乙型肝炎病毒相关肝病的过程评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 May 26;22(1):707. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08062-7.
3
Measuring Community-Engaged Research Contexts, Processes, and Outcomes: A Mapping Review.测量社区参与式研究的背景、过程和结果:一个映射综述。
Milbank Q. 2020 Jun;98(2):493-553. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12458. Epub 2020 May 19.
4
Best Practices for Community-Engaged Research with Pacific Islander Communities in the US and USAPI: A Scoping Review.美国与太平洋岛民社区及美属亚太裔社区开展社区参与式研究的最佳实践:一项范围综述
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2019;30(4):1302-1330. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2019.0101.

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer patient navigator tasks across the cancer care continuum.癌症患者导航员在癌症护理连续过程中的任务。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2012 Feb;23(1):398-413. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2012.0029.
2
Using appreciative inquiry to facilitate implementation of the recovery model in mental health agencies.运用积极探询法促进心理健康机构中康复模式的实施。
Health Soc Work. 2011 Nov;36(4):259-66. doi: 10.1093/hsw/36.4.259.
3
History and principles of patient navigation.患者导航的历史与原则。
Cancer. 2011 Aug;117(15 Suppl):3539-42. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26262.
4
A qualitative assessment of community-based breast health navigation services for Southeast Asian women in Southern California: recommendations for developing a navigator training curriculum.加利福尼亚州南部针对东南亚女性的社区主导型乳腺癌健康导航服务的定性评估:制定导航员培训课程的建议。
Am J Public Health. 2011 Jan;101(1):87-93. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.176743. Epub 2010 Nov 18.
5
Using community-based research methods to design cancer patient navigation training.运用基于社区的研究方法设计癌症患者导航培训。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2008 Winter;2(4):329-40. doi: 10.1353/cpr.0.0037.
6
'If we can't do more, let's do it differently!': using appreciative inquiry to promote innovative ideas for better health care work environments.“如果我们不能做得更多,那就换个方式做吧!”:运用欣赏式探询促进更好的医疗保健工作环境的创新理念。
J Nurs Manag. 2009 Dec;17(8):947-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2009.01022.x.
7
Developing a community-based collaboration to reduce cancer health disparities among Pacific Islanders in California.开展基于社区的合作,以减少加利福尼亚州太平洋岛民之间的癌症健康差距。
Pac Health Dialog. 2007 Mar;14(1):119-27.
8
Community-based participatory research from the margin to the mainstream: are researchers prepared?从边缘到主流的基于社区的参与性研究:研究人员准备好了吗?
Circulation. 2009 May 19;119(19):2633-42. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.729863.
9
Community capacity for cancer control collaboration: weaving an Islander Network for Cancer Awareness, Research and Training for Pacific Islanders in Southern California.社区癌症控制协作能力:为南加州的太平洋岛民编织一个癌症认知、研究与培训岛民网络。
Cancer Detect Prev. 2008;32 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S37-40. doi: 10.1016/j.cdp.2007.12.005. Epub 2008 Mar 24.
10
Improving nursing practice and patient care: building capacity with appreciative inquiry.改善护理实践与患者护理:运用积极探询法提升能力
J Nurs Adm. 2006 Oct;36(10):463-70. doi: 10.1097/00005110-200610000-00007.

通过肯定性探究加强基于社区的参与性研究伙伴关系。

Enhancing Community-Based Participatory Research Partnerships Through Appreciative Inquiry.

作者信息

Paige Ciara, Peters Ruth, Parkhurst Malia, Beck Leah Leilani, Hui Brian, May Vanessa Tui, Tanjasiri Sora Park

出版信息

Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2015 Autumn;9(3):457-63. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2015.0054.

DOI:10.1353/cpr.2015.0054
PMID:26548798
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5142846/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Challenges in community-based participatory research (CBPR) partnerships often pertain to trust and power, dilemmas posed by funding sources, and equitable community participation. Although challenges in CBPR can be welcomed because they present opportunities for growth and development of partnerships, tools are needed to facilitate issue identification and resolution. Moreover, such tools need to align with CBPR principles involving equal feedback among partners to improve the partnership and its outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To describe how appreciative inquiry (AI) was used as an evaluation tool to contribute to the strengthening of empowerment of ongoing and future community-university relationships in CBPR collaborations.

METHODS

AI was applied at the end of a community-university partnership to promote breast and cervical cancer screening among Tongan women in Southern California. Through individual interviews and group discussion, tensions were identified and discussed in light of partnership and community strengths.

RESULTS

Through AI, program staff emphasized community and university strengths of shared key values related to the program and aspects of program management that enabled them to contribute to successful program outcomes. They also discussed the following challenges: 1) approach of partners, 2) role definition, and 3) and time span of program development and implementation. Based on these discussions, recommendations were made to overcome current challenges and improve ongoing and future CBPR collaborations.

CONCLUSIONS

The AI process helped the partners recommit to collaborate with each other, renewed their excitement about working together, and assisted with reclarification of their roles to inform future collaborations.

摘要

背景

基于社区的参与性研究(CBPR)伙伴关系中的挑战通常涉及信任与权力、资金来源带来的困境以及社区公平参与。尽管CBPR中的挑战因其为伙伴关系的成长与发展提供了机遇而受到欢迎,但仍需要工具来促进问题的识别与解决。此外,此类工具需要与CBPR原则保持一致,这些原则包括伙伴之间的平等反馈,以改善伙伴关系及其成果。

目的

描述如何将 appreciative inquiry(AI)用作一种评估工具,以助力加强CBPR合作中当前及未来社区与大学关系的赋权。

方法

在一个社区与大学伙伴关系结束时应用AI,以促进南加州汤加女性的乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查。通过个人访谈和小组讨论,根据伙伴关系和社区优势识别并讨论了紧张关系。

结果

通过AI,项目工作人员强调了社区和大学在与项目相关的共享关键价值观以及项目管理方面的优势,这些优势使他们能够为项目的成功成果做出贡献。他们还讨论了以下挑战:1)伙伴的方法,2)角色定义,3)项目开发与实施的时间跨度。基于这些讨论提出了建议,以克服当前挑战并改善当前及未来的CBPR合作。

结论

AI过程帮助伙伴们重新承诺相互合作,重新激发了他们共同合作的热情,并协助重新明确了他们的角色,为未来的合作提供参考。