Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Apr;35(4):963-8. doi: 10.1002/jmri.23535. Epub 2011 Dec 6.
To evaluate the feasibility of performing single breathhold three-dimensional (3D) thoracic noncontrast MR angiography (NC-MRA) using highly accelerated parallel imaging.
We developed a single breathhold NC MRA pulse sequence using balanced steady state free precession (SSFP) readout and highly accelerated parallel imaging. In 17 subjects, highly accelerated noncontrast MRA was compared against electrocardiogram-triggered contrast-enhanced MRA. Anonymized images were randomized for blinded review by two independent readers for image quality, artifact severity in eight defined vessel segments and aortic dimensions in six standard sites. NC-MRA and CE-MRA were compared in terms of these measures using paired sample t- and Wilcoxon tests.
The overall image quality (3.21 ± 0.68 for NC-MRA versus 3.12 ± 0.71 for CE-MRA) and artifact (2.87 ± 1.01 for NC-MRA versus 2.92 ± 0.87 for CE-MRA) scores were not significantly different, but there were significant differences for the great vessel and coronary artery origins. NC-MRA demonstrated significantly lower aortic diameter measurements compared with CE-MRA; however, this difference was not considered clinically relevant (>3 mm difference) for less than 12% of segments, most commonly at the sinotubular junction. Mean total scan time was significantly lower for NC-MRA compared with CE-MRA (18.2 ± 6.0 s versus 28.1 ± 5.4 s, respectively; P < 0.05).
Single breathhold NC-MRA is feasible and can be a useful alternative for evaluation and follow-up of thoracic aortic diseases.
评估使用高度加速并行成像进行单次屏气三维(3D)胸部非对比磁共振血管成像(NC-MRA)的可行性。
我们开发了一种使用平衡稳态自由进动(SSFP)读取和高度加速并行成像的单次屏气 NC MRA 脉冲序列。在 17 名受试者中,高度加速非对比 MRA 与心电图触发的对比增强 MRA 进行了比较。对匿名图像进行了随机化,由两名独立的读者进行盲法评估,评估内容包括图像质量、八个定义血管段的伪影严重程度以及六个标准部位的主动脉尺寸。使用配对样本 t 检验和 Wilcoxon 检验,对 NC-MRA 和 CE-MRA 在这些测量指标上进行了比较。
总体图像质量(NC-MRA 为 3.21±0.68,CE-MRA 为 3.12±0.71)和伪影评分(NC-MRA 为 2.87±1.01,CE-MRA 为 2.92±0.87)无显著差异,但大血管和冠状动脉起源处存在显著差异。NC-MRA 显示主动脉直径测量值明显低于 CE-MRA;然而,这种差异在不到 12%的节段(最常见于窦管交界处)被认为没有临床意义(差异大于 3mm)。NC-MRA 的总扫描时间明显短于 CE-MRA(分别为 18.2±6.0s 和 28.1±5.4s;P<0.05)。
单次屏气 NC-MRA 是可行的,可作为评估和随访胸主动脉疾病的有用替代方法。