• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

每家医院都配备一个经皮冠状动脉介入治疗实验室?

A percutaneous coronary intervention lab in every hospital?

作者信息

Concannon Thomas W, Nelson Jason, Goetz Jessica, Griffith John L

机构信息

Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center and Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02111, USA.

出版信息

Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 Jan;5(1):14-20. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.963868. Epub 2011 Dec 6.

DOI:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.963868
PMID:22147882
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4440579/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 2001, 1176 US hospitals were capable of performing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and 79% of the population lived within 60-minute ground transport of these hospitals. We compared these estimates with data from 2006 to explore how hospital PCI capability and population access have changed over time.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We estimated the proportion of the population 18 years of age or older, living in 2006 within a 60-minute drive of a PCI-capable hospital, and we compared our estimate with a previously published report on 2001 data. Over the 5-year period, the number of PCI-capable hospitals grew from 1176 to 1695 hospitals, a relative increase of 44%; access to the procedure grew from 79.0% to 79.9% of the population, a relative increase of 1%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicate a large increase in the number of hospitals capable of performing PCI from 2001 to 2006, but this increase was not associated with an appreciable change in the proportion of the population with access to the procedure. In the future, more attention is needed on changes in PCI capacity over time and on the effects of these changes on outcomes of interest such as service utilization, expenditures, patient outcomes, and population health.

摘要

背景

2001年,美国有1176家医院能够开展直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI),79%的人口居住在距这些医院地面交通60分钟可达的范围内。我们将这些估计数据与2006年的数据进行比较,以探讨医院PCI能力和民众可及性随时间的变化情况。

方法与结果

我们估算了2006年居住在距具备PCI能力医院驾车60分钟范围内的18岁及以上人口比例,并将我们的估算结果与之前发表的关于2001年数据的报告进行比较。在这5年期间,具备PCI能力的医院数量从1176家增至1695家,相对增长了44%;该治疗的可及性从占人口的79.0%增至79.9%,相对增长了1%。

结论

我们的数据表明,2001年至2006年期间能够开展PCI的医院数量大幅增加,但这一增加与接受该治疗的人口比例的显著变化并无关联。未来,需要更加关注PCI能力随时间的变化以及这些变化对诸如服务利用、支出、患者结局和人群健康等相关结局的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc39/4440579/d82aab2f1d92/nihms690354f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc39/4440579/d82aab2f1d92/nihms690354f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc39/4440579/d82aab2f1d92/nihms690354f1.jpg

相似文献

1
A percutaneous coronary intervention lab in every hospital?每家医院都配备一个经皮冠状动脉介入治疗实验室?
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 Jan;5(1):14-20. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.963868. Epub 2011 Dec 6.
2
Universal access to a percutaneous coronary intervention hospital: is it feasible or desirable?普及经皮冠状动脉介入治疗医院:这可行吗?可取吗?
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 Jan;5(1):9-11. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.964270.
3
Driving times and distances to hospitals with percutaneous coronary intervention in the United States: implications for prehospital triage of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.美国前往具备经皮冠状动脉介入治疗能力医院的驾车时间和距离:对ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者院前分诊的影响
Circulation. 2006 Mar 7;113(9):1189-95. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.596346.
4
Treatment delays in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST elevation myocardial infarction at the Quebec Heart and Lung Institute.魁北克心肺研究所接受ST段抬高型心肌梗死直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的治疗延迟情况。
Can J Cardiol. 2007 Oct;23 Suppl B(Suppl B):53B-57B. doi: 10.1016/s0828-282x(07)71011-5.
5
Outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions performed at centers without and with onsite coronary artery bypass graft surgery.在没有现场冠状动脉旁路移植手术和有现场冠状动脉旁路移植手术的中心进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的结果。
JAMA. 2004 Oct 27;292(16):1961-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.16.1961.
6
Differences in patient survival after acute myocardial infarction by hospital capability of performing percutaneous coronary intervention: implications for regionalization.急性心肌梗死后患者生存率因医院实施经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的能力不同而存在差异:对区域化的启示
Arch Intern Med. 2010 Mar 8;170(5):433-9. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.538.
7
Safety of elective--including "high risk"--percutaneous coronary interventions without on-site cardiac surgery.非急诊(包括“高风险”)经皮冠状动脉介入治疗且现场无心脏外科手术支持的安全性。
Am Heart J. 2004 Oct;148(4):676-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.03.040.
8
A survey of primary percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction in Canadian hospitals.加拿大医院对ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者进行的直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗调查。
Can J Cardiol. 2008 Nov;24(11):839-43. doi: 10.1016/s0828-282x(08)70192-2.
9
Transferring patients for primary angioplasty in eastern Melbourne (the SHIPEM registry): are we meeting the guidelines?将患者转往墨尔本东部进行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(SHIPEM 登记研究):我们是否符合指南?
Med J Aust. 2010 Jun 21;192(12):702-7. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03707.x.
10
Relationship of the distance between non-PCI hospitals and primary PCI centers, mode of transport, and reperfusion time among ground and air interhospital transfers using NCDR's ACTION Registry-GWTG: a report from the American Heart Association Mission: Lifeline Program.利用 NCDR 的 ACTION 注册-GWTG 研究:美国心脏协会生命线计划的报告,探讨非 PCI 医院与初级 PCI 中心之间的距离、转运方式和地面与空中医院间转运的再灌注时间之间的关系。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Dec;7(6):797-805. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.113.001307. Epub 2014 Nov 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Structural Inequities In The Adoption Of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Services By US Hospitals, 2000-20.2000 年至 20 年间美国医院经皮冠状动脉介入治疗服务采用的结构性不平等
Health Aff (Millwood). 2024 Jul;43(7):1011-1020. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2023.01649.
2
High-Frequency, 2-mm-Diameter Forward-Viewing 2-D Array for 3-D Intracoronary Blood Flow Imaging.高频、2 毫米直径前向视野 2D 阵列用于三维冠状动脉血流成像。
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2024 Aug;71(8):1051-1061. doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2024.3418708. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
3
Physician Transfer Versus Patient Transfer for Mechanical Thrombectomy in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
New cardiac surgery programs established from 1993 to 2004 led to little increased access, substantial duplication of services.1993 年至 2004 年间建立的新心脏外科项目导致获得机会略有增加,服务大量重复。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Aug;30(8):1569-74. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0210. Epub 2011 Jun 23.
2
Coronary revascularization trends in the United States, 2001-2008.美国 2001-2008 年冠状动脉血运重建趋势。
JAMA. 2011 May 4;305(17):1769-76. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.551.
3
Comparative effectiveness of ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction regionalization strategies.
急性缺血性脑卒中患者行机械取栓术时采用医师转运与患者转运的效果比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Jul 2;13(13):e031906. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.031906. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
4
Distribution of catheterisation laboratories in Indonesia 2017-2022: a nationwide survey.2017 - 2022年印度尼西亚导管插入实验室的分布情况:一项全国性调查。
Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia. 2024 May 10;26:100418. doi: 10.1016/j.lansea.2024.100418. eCollection 2024 Jul.
5
Is more better? A multilevel analysis of percutaneous coronary intervention hospital openings and closures on patient volumes.更多更好吗?经皮冠状动脉介入治疗医院开放和关闭对患者量的多层次分析。
Acad Emerg Med. 2024 Oct;31(10):994-1005. doi: 10.1111/acem.14926. Epub 2024 May 16.
6
Initial treatment of uninsured patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction by facility percutaneous coronary intervention capabilities.根据医疗机构经皮冠状动脉介入治疗能力对未参保的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者进行初始治疗。
Acad Emerg Med. 2024 Feb;31(2):119-128. doi: 10.1111/acem.14831. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
7
Differential Treatment and Outcomes for Patients With Heart Attacks in Advantaged and Disadvantaged Communities.优势社区和劣势社区的心脏病患者的差异化治疗和结果。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Sep 5;12(17):e030506. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.030506. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
8
Do PCI Facility Openings and Closures Affect AMI Outcomes Differently in High- vs Average-Capacity Markets?PCI 设施的开设和关闭是否会对高容量市场和平均容量市场的 AMI 结局产生不同影响?
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 May 22;16(10):1129-1140. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.02.010. Epub 2023 May 3.
9
Inter-hospital transfer in patients with acute myocardial infarction in China: Findings from the improving care for cardiovascular disease in China-acute coronary syndrome project.中国急性心肌梗死患者的院间转运:来自中国改善心血管疾病护理-急性冠状动脉综合征项目的研究结果
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Dec 8;9:1064690. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1064690. eCollection 2022.
10
Structural Discrimination in Emergency Care: How a Sick System Affects Us All.急诊中的结构性歧视:一个病态的系统如何影响我们所有人。
Med. 2022 Feb 11;3(2):98-103. doi: 10.1016/j.medj.2022.01.006.
ST段抬高型心肌梗死区域化策略的比较效果
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010 Sep;3(5):506-13. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.109.908541. Epub 2010 Jul 27.
4
Geographic access to burn center hospitals.烧伤中心医院的地理可达性。
JAMA. 2009 Oct 28;302(16):1774-81. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1548.
5
Income, insurance, and technology: why does health spending outpace economic growth?收入、保险和技术:为何医疗支出增速快于经济增长?
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Sep-Oct;28(5):1276-84. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.5.1276.
6
Access to pediatric trauma care in the United States.美国儿童创伤护理的可及性。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009 Jun;163(6):512-8. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.65.
7
Primary percutaneous coronary intervention expansion to hospitals without on-site cardiac surgery in Michigan: a geographic information systems analysis.密歇根州将直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗扩展至无现场心脏手术的医院:一项地理信息系统分析
Am Heart J. 2008 Apr;155(4):668-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.10.051. Epub 2008 Mar 7.
8
A geospatial analysis of emergency transport and inter-hospital transfer in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
Am J Cardiol. 2008 Jan 1;101(1):69-74. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.07.050. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
9
Development of systems of care for ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients: executive summary.ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者护理系统的发展:执行摘要。
Circulation. 2007 Jul 10;116(2):217-30. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.184043. Epub 2007 May 30.
10
Evaluating and improving the quality of care for acute myocardial infarction: can regionalization help?评估与改善急性心肌梗死的医疗质量:区域化能有所帮助吗?
JAMA. 2006 May 10;295(18):2177-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.18.2177.