Mixon Timothy A, Suhr Eunice, Caldwell Gerald, Greenberg Robert D, Colato Fernando, Blackwell Jeffry, Jo Chan-Hee, Dehmer Gregory J
Division of Cardiology, Scott & White Healthcare, Temple, TX, USA.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 Jan;5(1):62-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.961672. Epub 2011 Dec 6.
Rapid activation of a cardiac catheterization laboratory (CCL) has reduced door-to-balloon times in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), leading to lower mortality. This process is accelerated with prehospital electrocardiography and notification. False activations of the CCL occur at an unknown rate and have been poorly described.
We analyzed 345 consecutive CCL activations for suspected STEMI over 18 months (March 2009-August 2010). We retrospectively reviewed the ECGs that prompted activation, as well as the clinical course and final diagnoses. Among all CCL activations, STEMI was not confirmed in 28%. On review, 301 (87.2%) had appropriate ECG criteria for activation. However, even among the ECG-appropriate patients, only 247 (82%) had a final diagnosis of STEMI. The inclusion of clinical characteristics did not improve the ability to identify patients with STEMI. Activations were modestly more accurate when made by emergency department physicians than by emergency medical service personnel, but door-to-balloon time was noticeably shorter when emergency medical service personnel requested prehospital activation.
If all CCL activations are considered, the occurrence of false activations is surprisingly high. Although still the gold standard for diagnosis, these data reveal the inherent limitations of clinical evaluation and the ECG in identifying patients with STEMI. Within our retrospective review, we used a 2-tiered classification for STEMI activations based on ECG appropriateness and final clinical diagnosis to give a complete picture of false activations and assist in quality improvement.
心脏导管实验室(CCL)的快速启动缩短了ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者从入院到球囊扩张的时间,从而降低了死亡率。通过院前心电图检查和通知,这一过程得以加速。CCL的误启动发生率未知且鲜有描述。
我们分析了连续18个月(2009年3月至2010年8月)因疑似STEMI而进行的345次CCL启动情况。我们回顾性地审查了促使启动的心电图以及临床病程和最终诊断。在所有CCL启动中,28%未确诊为STEMI。经审查,301例(87.2%)有合适的启动心电图标准。然而,即使在心电图符合标准的患者中,也只有247例(82%)最终诊断为STEMI。纳入临床特征并不能提高识别STEMI患者的能力。急诊科医生进行的启动比急救人员进行的启动准确性略高,但当急救人员请求院前启动时,从入院到球囊扩张的时间明显更短。
如果考虑所有CCL启动情况,误启动的发生率高得惊人。尽管心电图仍是诊断的金标准,但这些数据揭示了临床评估和心电图在识别STEMI患者方面的固有局限性。在我们的回顾性研究中,我们根据心电图是否合适以及最终临床诊断对STEMI启动采用了两级分类,以全面了解误启动情况并协助改进质量。