Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC 27715, United States.
World J Gastroenterol. 2011 Nov 7;17(41):4581-9. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i41.4581.
To compare histological endpoint assessment using noninvasive alternatives to biopsy during treatment in a chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) cohort.
Patients with chronic HCV were randomized to receive interferon-based therapy for 24 (genotypes 2/3) or 48 (genotype 1) wk. FibroSURE™ (FS) was assessed at baseline and at week-12 post-treatment follow-up. Baseline biopsy for METAVIR was assessed by a single pathologist. FibroScan(®) transient elastography (TE) was performed during treatment in a patient subset.
Two thousand and sixty patients (n = 253 in Asia) were classified as METAVIR F0-1 (n = 1682) or F2-4 (n = 378). For F2-4, FS (n = 2055) had sensitivity and specificity of 0.87 and 0.61, respectively, with area under the receiver-operating curve of 0.82; corresponding values for TE (n = 214) and combined FS/TE (n = 209) were 0.77, 0.88 and 0.88, and 0.93, 0.68 and 0.88. Overall FS/TE agreement for F2-4 was 71% (κ = 0.41) and higher in Asians vs non-Asians (κ = 0.86 vs 0.35; P < 0.001). Combined FS/TE had 97% accuracy in Asians (n = 33). Baseline FS (0.38 vs 0.51, P < 0.001) and TE (8.0 kPa vs 11.9 kPa, P = 0.006) scores were lower in patients with sustained virological response than in nonresponders, and were maintained through follow-up.
FS and TE may reliably differentiate mild from moderate-advanced disease, with a potential for high diagnostic accuracy in Asians with chronic HCV.
在慢性丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)队列中,比较治疗期间使用非侵入性替代方法进行活检的组织学终点评估。
将慢性 HCV 患者随机分为接受基于干扰素的治疗 24(基因型 2/3)或 48(基因型 1)周。在治疗后 12 周的随访中评估 FibroSURE™(FS)。由一名病理学家评估基线和 METAVIR 活检。在患者亚组中进行 FibroScan(®)瞬态弹性成像(TE)。
2060 例患者(n = 253 例在亚洲)分为 METAVIR F0-1(n = 1682)或 F2-4(n = 378)。对于 F2-4,FS(n = 2055)的敏感性和特异性分别为 0.87 和 0.61,ROC 曲线下面积为 0.82;相应的 TE(n = 214)和 FS/TE 联合(n = 209)的值为 0.77、0.88 和 0.88,以及 0.93、0.68 和 0.88。总体而言,FS/TE 对 F2-4 的一致性为 71%(κ = 0.41),亚洲人与非亚洲人之间更高(κ = 0.86 与 0.35;P < 0.001)。在亚洲人中,联合 FS/TE 的准确率为 97%(n = 33)。与无应答者相比,持续病毒学应答患者的基线 FS(0.38 与 0.51,P < 0.001)和 TE(8.0 kPa 与 11.9 kPa,P = 0.006)评分较低,并在随访中得到维持。
FS 和 TE 可能可靠地区分轻度和中度-晚期疾病,在慢性 HCV 的亚洲人群中具有较高的诊断准确性。