Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
J Korean Med Sci. 2011 Dec;26(12):1556-62. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2011.26.12.1556. Epub 2011 Nov 29.
Many predictive models have been proposed for better stratification of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Hans' algorithm has been widely used as standard to sub-classify DLBCL into germinal center B-cell (GCB) and non-GCB origins. However, there have been disagreements in the literature regarding its prognostic significance. Here, we retrospectively analyzed Hans' algorithm and the individual immunohistochemical biomarkers at different cut-off values (5%, 30%, 50% or 75%) in 94 Korean patients with DLBCL treated with combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, daunorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone. No significant differences were observed between the GCB (18 patients, 19.1%) and non-GCB (76, 80.9%) groups. Among individual biomarkers, CD10 negativity (cut point: 30%) and bcl-6 positivity (cut point: 5%) were independent good prognostic markers in progression-free survival (PFS), whereas bcl-6 (cut point: 5%) positivity was an independent good prognostic marker in overall survival irrelevant of international prognostic index. The present study showed the lack of predictability of Hans' algorithm in DLBCL patients, and that CD10, Bcl-6 may have diverse prognostic significance at different cut-off values. Our results suggest that the proposed cut-off value may not be applied universally, and that the optimal cut-off value may need to be optimized for individual laboratory.
许多预测模型已经被提出,以更好地对弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)进行分层。Hans 算法已被广泛用作将 DLBCL 分为生发中心 B 细胞(GCB)和非 GCB 起源的标准。然而,文献中对于其预后意义存在分歧。在这里,我们回顾性分析了 94 例接受环磷酰胺、柔红霉素、长春新碱和泼尼松联合化疗的韩国 DLBCL 患者的 Hans 算法和不同截断值(5%、30%、50%或 75%)的单个免疫组化标志物。在 GCB(18 例,19.1%)和非 GCB(76 例,80.9%)组之间未观察到显著差异。在单个生物标志物中,CD10 阴性(截断值:30%)和 bcl-6 阳性(截断值:5%)是无进展生存期(PFS)的独立预后良好标志物,而 bcl-6(截断值:5%)阳性是国际预后指数无关的总生存期的独立预后良好标志物。本研究表明 Hans 算法在 DLBCL 患者中缺乏预测性,并且 CD10、Bcl-6 在不同截断值下可能具有不同的预后意义。我们的结果表明,所提出的截断值可能不适用于普遍情况,并且可能需要针对个别实验室进行优化以确定最佳截断值。