Department of Mechanical & Biomedical Engineering, Kangwon National University, Chucheon, Korea.
J Korean Med Sci. 2011 Dec;26(12):1591-8. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2011.26.12.1591. Epub 2011 Nov 29.
Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support under cannulation connected from the left atrium to the aorta (LA-AA) is used as a bridge to recovery in heart failure patients because it is non-invasive to ventricular muscle. However, it has serious problems, such as valve stenosis and blood thrombosis due to the low ejection fraction of the ventricle. We theoretically estimated the effect of the in-series cannulation, connected from ascending aorta to descending aorta (AA-DA), on ventricular unloading as an alternative to the LA-AA method. We developed a theoretical model of a LVAD-implanted cardiovascular system that included coronary circulation. Using this model, we compared hemodynamic responses according to various cannulation methods such as LA-AA, AA-DA, and a cannulation connected from the left ventricle to ascending aorta (LV-AA), under continuous and pulsatile LVAD supports. The AA-DA method provided 14% and 18% less left ventricular peak pressure than the LA-AA method under continuous and pulsatile LVAD conditions, respectively. The LA-AA method demonstrated higher coronary flow than AA-DA method. Therefore, the LA-AA method is more advantageous in increasing ventricular unloading whereas the AA-DA method is a better choice to increase coronary perfusion.
左心室辅助装置 (LVAD) 通过从左心房到主动脉 (LA-AA) 的插管支持被用作心力衰竭患者恢复的桥梁,因为它对心室肌肉是非侵入性的。然而,由于心室射血分数低,它存在严重的问题,如瓣膜狭窄和血栓形成。我们从理论上估计了从升主动脉到降主动脉 (AA-DA) 的串联插管对心室卸载的影响,作为 LA-AA 方法的替代方法。我们开发了一个包含冠状动脉循环的 LVAD 植入式心血管系统的理论模型。使用该模型,我们比较了在连续和脉动 LVAD 支持下,LA-AA、AA-DA 和从左心室到升主动脉的插管 (LV-AA) 等各种插管方法的血流动力学反应。在连续和脉动 LVAD 条件下,AA-DA 方法分别比 LA-AA 方法提供的左心室峰值压力低 14%和 18%。LA-AA 方法的冠状动脉流量高于 AA-DA 方法。因此,LA-AA 方法在增加心室卸载方面更有利,而 AA-DA 方法是增加冠状动脉灌注的更好选择。