Department of Mechanical and Biomedical Engineering, Kangwon National University, Hyoja-dong, Chuncheon, Gangwon-do, Republic of Korea.
J Physiol Sci. 2009 Jul;59(4):307-16. doi: 10.1007/s12576-009-0037-7. Epub 2009 Apr 23.
We developed a computational model to investigate the hemodynamic effects of a pulsatile left ventricular assist device (LVAD) on the cardiovascular system. The model consisted of 16 compartments for the cardiovascular system, including coronary circulation and LVAD, and autonomic nervous system control. A failed heart was modeled by decreasing the end-systolic elastance of the ventricle and blocking the mechanism controlling heart contractility. We assessed the physiological effect of the LVAD on the cardiovascular system for three types of LVAD flow: co-pulsation, counter-pulsation, and continuous flow modes. The results indicated that the pulsatile LVAD with counter-pulsation mode gave the most physiological coronary blood perfusion. In addition, the counter-pulsation mode resulted in a lower peak pressure of the left ventricle than the other modes, aiding cardiac recovery by reducing the ventricular afterload. In conclusion, these results indicate that, from the perspective of cardiovascular physiology, a pulsatile LVAD with counter-pulsation operation is a plausible alternative to the existing LVAD with continuous flow mode.
我们开发了一个计算模型,以研究脉动左心室辅助装置(LVAD)对心血管系统的血液动力学影响。该模型由 16 个心血管系统腔室组成,包括冠状动脉循环和 LVAD 以及自主神经系统控制。通过降低心室的收缩末期弹性和阻塞控制心脏收缩性的机制,模拟了衰竭的心脏。我们评估了 LVAD 在三种 LVAD 流量下对心血管系统的生理影响:同搏、反搏和连续流动模式。结果表明,具有反搏模式的脉动 LVAD 可提供最生理的冠状动脉血液灌注。此外,反搏模式导致左心室的峰值压力低于其他模式,通过减少心室后负荷来帮助心脏恢复。总之,这些结果表明,从心血管生理学的角度来看,具有反搏操作的脉动 LVAD 是现有连续流动模式 LVAD 的合理替代方案。