Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Med Educ. 2012 Jan;46(1):89-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04045.x.
Education is a complex intervention which produces different outcomes in different circumstances. Education researchers have long recognised the need to supplement experimental studies of efficacy with a broader range of study designs that will help to unpack the 'how' and 'why' questions and illuminate the many, varied and interdependent mechanisms by which interventions may work (or fail to work) in different contexts.
One promising approach is realist evaluation, which seeks to establish what works, for whom, in what circumstances, in what respects, to what extent, and why. This paper introduces the realist approach and explains why it is particularly suited to education research. It gives a brief introduction to the philosophical assumptions underlying realist methods and outlines key principles of realist evaluation (designed for empirical studies) and realist review (the application of realist methods to secondary research).
The paper warns that realist approaches are not a panacea and lists the circumstances in which they are likely to be particularly useful.
教育是一种复杂的干预措施,在不同情况下会产生不同的结果。教育研究人员早就认识到,需要用更广泛的研究设计来补充对疗效的实验研究,这些研究设计将有助于阐明“如何”和“为什么”的问题,并阐明干预措施在不同情况下可能(或未能)起作用的许多不同且相互依存的机制。
一种有前途的方法是现实主义评价,它试图确定在什么情况下、在哪些方面、在什么程度上、为什么,对谁有效。本文介绍了现实主义方法,并解释了为什么它特别适合教育研究。它简要介绍了现实主义方法的哲学假设,并概述了现实主义评价(针对实证研究)和现实主义综述(将现实主义方法应用于二次研究)的关键原则。
本文警告说,现实主义方法并不是万无一失的,并列出了它们可能特别有用的情况。