• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

了解在家提供临终关怀的医疗助理之间的同伴支持:一项现实主义综述方案

Understanding peer support among healthcare assistants delivering hospice care at home: a protocol for a realist review.

作者信息

Patynowska Katarzyna Anna, Hasson Felicity, McConnell Tracey, McIlfatrick Sonja

机构信息

Institute of Nursing and Health Research, Ulster University, Belfast, UK

Marie Curie Hospice, Belfast, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 4;15(6):e095990. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095990.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095990
PMID:40467327
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12142123/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Globally, the demand for community palliative care, delivered within the home setting, is rising. Hospice support workers, also referred to as healthcare assistants, play a crucial role in providing this care, but evidence indicates they face challenges relating to inadequate training, isolation and emotional labour. This realist review aims to understand how peer support interventions can support healthcare assistants in delivering hospice care at home.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The realist review will follow a five-step process to explore the research question: (1) locating existing initial programme theories, (2) searching for evidence, (3) selecting and appraising evidence, (4) extracting and organising data and (5) synthesising evidence and drawing conclusions. Comprehensive searches of academic databases (CINAHL, MEDLINE, AMED, Scopus) and grey literature sources will be conducted between November and December 2024, with no restrictions on publication date applied. Search strategies will be iteratively refined, with evidence selected based on relevance and rigour. Data will be extracted and coded using a realist logic model of analysis. The review will develop an explanatory programme theory for peer-to-peer interventions which would identify what, how, for whom, why and in what circumstances peer-to-peer interventions may support delivery of hospice care at home. It will explore the contexts, mechanisms and outcomes of these interventions using context-mechanism-outcome configurations.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval is not required as the review involves no primary data collection. This review aims to clarify research gaps, inform next stages of a wider study, policy and practice. Reporting of the findings will adhere to RAMESES publication standards for realist syntheses, ensuring transparency and rigour in reporting. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and other strategies identified by the stakeholder group.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42024606133.

摘要

引言

在全球范围内,对居家社区姑息治疗的需求正在上升。临终关怀支持工作者,也被称为医疗保健助理,在提供这种护理方面发挥着关键作用,但有证据表明他们面临着培训不足、孤立无援和情感劳动等挑战。这项现实主义综述旨在了解同伴支持干预措施如何支持医疗保健助理在家中提供临终关怀。

方法与分析

现实主义综述将遵循五个步骤来探讨研究问题:(1)定位现有的初始项目理论,(2)寻找证据,(3)选择和评估证据,(4)提取和整理数据,(5)综合证据并得出结论。将于2024年11月至12月对学术数据库(CINAHL、MEDLINE、AMED、Scopus)和灰色文献来源进行全面检索,不设出版日期限制。检索策略将不断完善,根据相关性和严谨性选择证据。将使用现实主义分析逻辑模型提取和编码数据。该综述将为同伴间干预制定一个解释性项目理论,该理论将确定同伴间干预在何种情况下、如何、针对何人、为何以及在何种情况下可能支持在家中提供临终关怀。它将使用背景-机制-结果配置来探索这些干预措施的背景、机制和结果。

伦理与传播

由于该综述不涉及原始数据收集,因此无需伦理批准。本综述旨在澄清研究差距,为更广泛研究、政策和实践的下一阶段提供信息。研究结果的报告将遵循现实主义综合研究的RAMESES出版标准,确保报告的透明度和严谨性。结果将通过同行评审出版物、会议报告和利益相关者团体确定的其他策略进行传播。

PROSPERO注册号:CRD42024606133。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/875f/12142123/27b1b2045ea2/bmjopen-15-6-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/875f/12142123/27b1b2045ea2/bmjopen-15-6-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/875f/12142123/27b1b2045ea2/bmjopen-15-6-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Understanding peer support among healthcare assistants delivering hospice care at home: a protocol for a realist review.了解在家提供临终关怀的医疗助理之间的同伴支持:一项现实主义综述方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 4;15(6):e095990. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095990.
2
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
3
Intervention Now to Eliminate Repeat Unintended Pregnancy in Teenagers (INTERUPT): a systematic review of intervention effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, and qualitative and realist synthesis of implementation factors and user engagement.青少年重复意外怀孕干预消除计划(INTERUPT):干预效果与成本效益的系统评价,以及实施因素和用户参与的定性与实在论综合分析
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Feb;20(16):1-214. doi: 10.3310/hta20160.
4
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
5
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
6
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
7
Factors that impact on the use of mechanical ventilation weaning protocols in critically ill adults and children: a qualitative evidence-synthesis.影响重症成人和儿童机械通气撤机方案使用的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 4;10(10):CD011812. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011812.pub2.
8
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.干预健康从业者与受影响者之间关于临终关怀的人际沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
9
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
10
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.

本文引用的文献

1
A nurse by any other name? An international comparison of nomenclature and regulation of healthcare assistants.换个名字的护士?医疗辅助人员命名与监管的国际比较。
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2024 Apr 16;6:100200. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100200. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
What works, how and in which contexts when supporting parents to implement intensive speech and language therapy at home for children with speech sound disorder? A protocol for a realist review.支持有言语障碍儿童的家长在家中实施强化言语语言治疗的有效措施、方法和影响因素是什么?一项针对现实情况的综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 6;14(1):e074272. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074272.
3
'That just doesn't feel right at times' - lone working practices, support and educational needs of newly employed Healthcare Assistants providing 24/7 palliative care in the community: A qualitative interview study.
“有时这感觉不太对”——新雇用的在社区提供 24/7 姑息治疗的医疗保健助理的独自工作实践、支持和教育需求:一项定性访谈研究。
Palliat Med. 2023 Sep;37(8):1183-1192. doi: 10.1177/02692163231175990. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
4
Peer support between healthcare workers in hospital and out-of-hospital settings: a scoping review.医疗机构内和医疗机构外医护人员之间的同伴支持:范围综述。
Acta Biomed. 2022 Oct 26;93(5):e2022308. doi: 10.23750/abm.v93i5.13729.
5
Peer Support and Mental Health of Migrant Domestic Workers: A Scoping Review.同伴支持与移民家庭佣工的心理健康:范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 22;19(13):7617. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137617.
6
The impact of covid-19 on out-of-hours adult hospice care: an online survey.新冠疫情对成人临终关怀非工作时间服务的影响:一项在线调查。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Jun 1;21(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-00985-6.
7
Preferences for home care to enable home death among adult patients with cancer in late palliative phase - a grounded theory study.晚期姑息治疗阶段癌症成年患者对居家护理以实现居家死亡的偏好——一项扎根理论研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Apr 11;21(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-00939-y.
8
Measuring effectiveness in community-based palliative care programs: A systematic review.衡量社区姑息治疗项目的有效性:一项系统综述。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Mar;296:114731. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114731. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
9
A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance.制定和评估复杂干预措施的新框架:对医学研究理事会指南的更新。
BMJ. 2021 Sep 30;374:n2061. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n2061.
10
Using Peer Support to Strengthen Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Review.利用同伴支持在 COVID-19 大流行期间加强心理健康:一项综述。
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Jul 12;12:714181. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.714181. eCollection 2021.