• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

居民收集的灰尘样本在评估住宅过敏原和真菌水平方面的效果。

Efficacy of occupant-collected dust samples in the evaluation of residential allergen and fungal levels.

机构信息

National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado 80206, USA.

出版信息

J Occup Environ Hyg. 2012;9(1):14-24. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2012.633069.

DOI:10.1080/15459624.2012.633069
PMID:22150472
Abstract

This study evaluated the ability of a resident to evaluate their home for allergens and mold using a settled dust test kit compared with evaluation and collection of settled dust by an industrial hygienist. Forty-three home residents were provided with a kit containing written instructions and a vacuum cleaner attachment for collecting a settled dust sample. Within 2 weeks of receiving the occupant-collected sample, an industrial hygienist evaluated these homes, including a visual inspection, collection of settled dust, and collection of spore trap samples. Settled dust samples were analyzed for major dog, cat, dust mite, and cockroach allergens using immunoassay methods, and for mold spore equivalents using quantitative polymerase chain reaction methods for the 13 mold species or species groups comprising the American Relative Moldiness Index (ARMI). Allergen concentrations and ARMIs were compared between the resident- and industrial hygienist-collected samples. Linear regression between the two sets of samples showed strong correlations for dog allergen (r(2) = 0.92) and cat allergen (r(2) = 0.90). Correlations for dust mite (r(2) = 0.57) and cockroach allergens (r(2) = 0.22) were lower, likely due to most samples being near the limit of detection. ARMIs were highly correlated (r(2) = 0.68) and were in categorical (high, medium, or low) agreement for 76% of residences. These results show that residents can reliably follow directions and collect settled dust samples, providing an efficient method to remotely screen homes for elevated allergen levels and to identify homes with a potential mold or moisture problem that may need further evaluation.

摘要

这项研究评估了居民使用尘埃沉降测试试剂盒评估其家中过敏原和霉菌的能力,与工业卫生学家评估和收集尘埃沉降物相比。为 43 名家庭居民提供了一个试剂盒,其中包含书面说明和用于收集尘埃沉降样本的真空吸尘器附件。在收到居住者收集的样本后的两周内,工业卫生学家评估了这些家庭,包括目视检查、收集尘埃沉降物以及收集孢子陷阱样本。使用免疫测定方法分析尘埃沉降样本中的主要狗、猫、尘螨和蟑螂过敏原,并使用定量聚合酶链反应方法分析包含在美国相对霉菌指数 (ARMI) 中的 13 种霉菌或霉菌组的霉菌孢子等价物。比较了居民和工业卫生学家收集的样本中的过敏原浓度和 ARMI。两组样本之间的线性回归显示狗过敏原 (r²=0.92) 和猫过敏原 (r²=0.90) 之间具有很强的相关性。尘螨 (r²=0.57) 和蟑螂过敏原 (r²=0.22) 的相关性较低,可能是由于大多数样本接近检测限。ARMI 高度相关 (r²=0.68),并且 76%的住宅在分类 (高、中或低) 上具有一致性。这些结果表明,居民可以按照说明可靠地收集尘埃沉降样本,为远程筛查家中过敏原水平升高以及识别可能需要进一步评估的有潜在霉菌或潮湿问题的家庭提供了一种有效方法。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of occupant-collected dust samples in the evaluation of residential allergen and fungal levels.居民收集的灰尘样本在评估住宅过敏原和真菌水平方面的效果。
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2012;9(1):14-24. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2012.633069.
2
Longitudinal evaluation of allergen and culturable fungal concentrations in inner-city households.城市中心家庭中变应原和可培养真菌浓度的纵向评估。
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2008 Feb;5(2):107-18. doi: 10.1080/15459620701827049.
3
House dust mite and cockroach exposure are strong risk factors for positive allergy skin test responses in the Childhood Asthma Management Program.在儿童哮喘管理项目中,接触屋尘螨和蟑螂是皮肤过敏试验呈阳性反应的强烈风险因素。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001 Jan;107(1):48-54. doi: 10.1067/mai.2001.111146.
4
Reproducibility of allergen, endotoxin and fungi measurements in the indoor environment.室内环境中过敏原、内毒素和真菌测量的可重复性。
J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 2003 Mar;13(2):152-60. doi: 10.1038/sj.jea.7500267.
5
A side-by-side comparison of sampling methods for settled, indoor allergens.室内沉降过敏原采样方法的并列比较。
Environ Res. 2001 Sep;87(1):37-46. doi: 10.1006/enrs.2001.4284.
6
Exposure to microbial components and allergens in population studies: a comparison of two house dust collection methods applied by participants and fieldworkers.人群研究中微生物成分和过敏原的暴露:参与者与现场工作人员采用的两种家庭灰尘收集方法的比较
Indoor Air. 2006 Dec;16(6):414-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2006.00435.x.
7
Mouse and cockroach allergens in the dust and air in northeastern United States inner-city public high schools.美国东北部市中心公立高中灰尘和空气中的小鼠及蟑螂过敏原。
Indoor Air. 2005 Aug;15(4):228-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2005.00363.x.
8
Allergenic materials in the house dust of allergy clinic patients.过敏症门诊患者室内灰尘中的致敏物质。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2001 May;86(5):517-23. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62899-2.
9
Indoor allergens in Minnesota schools and child care centers.明尼苏达州学校和儿童保育中心的室内过敏原。
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2009 Sep;6(9):582-91. doi: 10.1080/15459620903103454.
10
Fungal types and concentrations from settled dust in normal residences.普通住宅沉降灰尘中的真菌类型及浓度。
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2005 Oct;2(10):481-92. doi: 10.1080/15459620500252860.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparison of subject room dust with home vacuum dust for evaluation of dust-borne aeroallergens.比较室内尘土和家用真空吸尘尘土,评估尘螨过敏原。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2013 May;110(5):375-9. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2013.02.010. Epub 2013 Mar 7.