Suppr超能文献

内容效度——在新开发的用于医疗产品评估的患者报告结局(PRO)工具中建立和报告证据:ISPOR PRO 良好研究实践工作组报告:第 1 部分——为新 PRO 工具征集概念。

Content validity--establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO good research practices task force report: part 1--eliciting concepts for a new PRO instrument.

机构信息

Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-9455, USA.

出版信息

Value Health. 2011 Dec;14(8):967-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.06.014. Epub 2011 Oct 13.

Abstract

The importance of content validity in developing patient reported outcomes (PRO) instruments is stressed by both the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency. Content validity is the extent to which an instrument measures the important aspects of concepts that developers or users purport it to assess. A PRO instrument measures the concepts most significant and relevant to a patient's condition and its treatment. For PRO instruments, items and domains as reflected in the scores of an instrument should be important to the target population and comprehensive with respect to patient concerns. Documentation of target population input in item generation, as well as evaluation of patient understanding through cognitive interviewing, can provide the evidence for content validity. Developing content for, and assessing respondent understanding of, newly developed PRO instruments for medical product evaluation will be discussed in this two-part ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force Report. Topics include the methods for generating items, documenting item development, coding of qualitative data from item generation, cognitive interviewing, and tracking item development through the various stages of research and preparing this tracking for submission to regulatory agencies. Part 1 covers elicitation of key concepts using qualitative focus groups and/or interviews to inform content and structure of a new PRO instrument. Part 2 covers the instrument development process, the assessment of patient understanding of the draft instrument using cognitive interviews and steps for instrument revision. The two parts are meant to be read together. They are intended to offer suggestions for good practices in planning, executing, and documenting qualitative studies that are used to support the content validity of PRO instruments to be used in medical product evaluation.

摘要

美国食品和药物管理局以及欧洲药品管理局均强调了内容效度在开发患者报告结局(PRO)工具中的重要性。内容效度是指工具在多大程度上测量了开发者或使用者声称要评估的概念的重要方面。PRO 工具测量与患者病情及其治疗最相关和最重要的概念。对于 PRO 工具而言,工具得分所反映的项目和领域应与目标人群有关,并且全面涵盖患者的关注点。通过生成项目的目标人群投入的文件记录,以及通过认知访谈评估患者的理解,可以提供内容效度的证据。本文将讨论用于医学产品评估的新开发的 PRO 工具的内容开发和评估受访者理解的内容,这是 ISPOR PRO 良好研究实践工作组报告的两部分内容。主题包括生成项目的方法、记录项目开发、从项目生成中定性数据的编码、认知访谈以及通过研究的各个阶段跟踪项目开发并为提交给监管机构准备此跟踪。第 1 部分涵盖了使用定性焦点小组和/或访谈来获取关键概念,以告知新 PRO 工具的内容和结构。第 2 部分涵盖了工具开发过程、使用认知访谈评估患者对草案工具的理解以及工具修订步骤。这两部分内容应一起阅读。它们旨在为计划、执行和记录定性研究提供建议,这些研究用于支持在医学产品评估中使用的 PRO 工具的内容效度。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验