Division of Endodontics, Department of Oral Biological and Medical Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
J Endod. 2012 Jan;38(1):24-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.10.007. Epub 2011 Nov 16.
Internal inflammatory root resorption is regarded as rare because it is only occasionally detected in clinical or radiographic examination of teeth. However, inflammation is supposedly an important etiologic factor of internal resorption. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that there is no difference in the presence of internal resorption between teeth with vital, healthy pulp and teeth with a history of pulp inflammation.
Thirty teeth with no previous root canal treatment that were to be sequentially extracted from adult patients were diagnosed for their pulpal status (ie, healthy, pulpitis, or necrosis). After extraction, the teeth were split buccolingually, and both halves were exposed to 6% sodium hypochlorite for 10 minutes under constant shaking to remove all organic debris covering the root canal walls. The specimens were washed in water and prepared for scanning electron microscopy to examine the root canals for the presence of internal resorption.
The null hypothesis of this study was rejected. None of the 9 teeth with healthy pulps revealed signs of internal resorption. Four of the 8 teeth with pulpitis (50%) and 10 of the 13 teeth with necrotic pulps (77%) had internal resorption (P < .01). The average number of resorptive lesions in the affected necrotic teeth was 2.4, whereas in teeth with pulpitis and internal resorption, the average number of lesions was 1.25. The amount of resorption was always <100-μm deep; the length of the lesions varied from 200 μm to >1 mm. Most lesions (15) were detected in the middle third of the root, followed by the apical third (13). Only 1 internal resorptive lesion was detected in the coronal third of the root canal.
Internal resorption was a frequent finding in teeth with pulp inflammation or necrosis.
内源性炎症性根吸收被认为是罕见的,因为它只是偶尔在牙齿的临床或放射学检查中被发现。然而,炎症据称是内吸收的一个重要病因。因此,我们检验了这样一个假设,即活髓健康的牙齿和有牙髓炎症病史的牙齿之间,内吸收的存在没有差异。
从成年患者中连续拔出 30 颗未经根管治疗的牙齿,诊断其牙髓状态(即健康、牙髓炎或坏死)。拔牙后,将牙齿颊舌向劈开,两半均用 6%次氯酸钠在持续摇动下暴露 10 分钟,以去除覆盖根管壁的所有有机碎屑。将标本在水中冲洗并准备进行扫描电子显微镜检查,以检查根管中内吸收的存在。
本研究的零假设被拒绝。9 颗牙髓健康的牙齿均未发现内吸收的迹象。8 颗牙髓炎牙齿中有 4 颗(50%)和 13 颗坏死牙髓牙齿中有 10 颗(77%)有内吸收(P <.01)。受影响的坏死牙齿中的平均吸收病变数为 2.4,而牙髓炎和内吸收牙齿中的平均病变数为 1.25。吸收量始终<100-μm 深;病变的长度从 200 μm 到>1 mm 不等。大多数病变(15 个)位于根的中三分之一,其次是根尖三分之一(13 个)。仅在根管的冠三分之一处检测到 1 个内吸收病变。
内吸收在有牙髓炎症或坏死的牙齿中是一种常见的发现。