• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

随时间的因果结构学习:观测与干预。

Causal structure learning over time: observations and interventions.

机构信息

Department of Hospital Medicine, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave., MC5000, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.

出版信息

Cogn Psychol. 2012 Feb;64(1-2):93-125. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.10.003. Epub 2011 Dec 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.10.003
PMID:22155679
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3309528/
Abstract

Seven studies examined how people learn causal relationships in scenarios when the variables are temporally dependent - the states of variables are stable over time. When people intervene on X, and Y subsequently changes state compared to before the intervention, people infer that X influences Y. This strategy allows people to learn causal structures quickly and reliably when variables are temporally stable (Experiments 1 and 2). People use this strategy even when the cover story suggests that the trials are independent (Experiment 3). When observing variables over time, people believe that when a cause changes state, its effects likely change state, but an effect may change state due to an exogenous influence in which case its observed cause may not change state at the same time. People used this strategy to learn the direction of causal relations and a wide variety of causal structures (Experiments 4-6). Finally, considering exogenous influences responsible for the observed changes facilitates learning causal directionality (Experiment 7). Temporal reasoning may be the norm rather than the exception for causal learning and may reflect the way most events are experienced naturalistically.

摘要

有七项研究考察了人们在变量具有时间依赖性(变量的状态随时间稳定)的情况下如何学习因果关系。当人们干预 X 时,与干预前相比,Y 随后改变状态,人们推断 X 影响 Y。当变量在时间上稳定时,这种策略可以使人们快速可靠地学习因果结构(实验 1 和实验 2)。即使在掩盖故事表明试验是独立的情况下,人们也会使用这种策略(实验 3)。当随时间观察变量时,人们相信当一个原因改变状态时,它的影响可能也会改变状态,但一个影响可能由于外部影响而改变状态,在这种情况下,其观察到的原因可能不会同时改变状态。人们使用这种策略来学习因果关系的方向和各种因果结构(实验 4-6)。最后,考虑到导致观察到的变化的外部影响有助于学习因果方向(实验 7)。时间推理可能是因果学习的常态而不是例外,并且可能反映了大多数事件在自然状态下被体验的方式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41e8/3309528/7cb8d7614bff/nihms334375f12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41e8/3309528/1ba22d8ec91a/nihms334375f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41e8/3309528/80329c58e2b7/nihms334375f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41e8/3309528/fa8ce3383c51/nihms334375f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41e8/3309528/34927ffa874b/nihms334375f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41e8/3309528/31ec2f794462/nihms334375f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41e8/3309528/8323845bda5f/nihms334375f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41e8/3309528/92a9d3501f9b/nihms334375f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41e8/3309528/338e42341b11/nihms334375f8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41e8/3309528/9a26a303fff5/nihms334375f9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41e8/3309528/0f4771d32998/nihms334375f10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41e8/3309528/75ed2a1e4cd4/nihms334375f11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41e8/3309528/7cb8d7614bff/nihms334375f12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41e8/3309528/1ba22d8ec91a/nihms334375f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41e8/3309528/80329c58e2b7/nihms334375f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41e8/3309528/fa8ce3383c51/nihms334375f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41e8/3309528/34927ffa874b/nihms334375f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41e8/3309528/31ec2f794462/nihms334375f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41e8/3309528/8323845bda5f/nihms334375f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41e8/3309528/92a9d3501f9b/nihms334375f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41e8/3309528/338e42341b11/nihms334375f8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41e8/3309528/9a26a303fff5/nihms334375f9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41e8/3309528/0f4771d32998/nihms334375f10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41e8/3309528/75ed2a1e4cd4/nihms334375f11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41e8/3309528/7cb8d7614bff/nihms334375f12.jpg

相似文献

1
Causal structure learning over time: observations and interventions.随时间的因果结构学习:观测与干预。
Cogn Psychol. 2012 Feb;64(1-2):93-125. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.10.003. Epub 2011 Dec 7.
2
Children use temporal cues to learn causal directionality.儿童利用时间线索来学习因果方向性。
Cogn Sci. 2014 Apr;38(3):489-513. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12070. Epub 2013 Aug 13.
3
Continuous time causal structure induction with prevention and generation.基于预防和生成的连续时间因果结构推断。
Cognition. 2023 Nov;240:105530. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105530. Epub 2023 Aug 16.
4
The role of learning data in causal reasoning about observations and interventions.学习数据在关于观察和干预的因果推理中的作用。
Mem Cognit. 2009 Apr;37(3):249-64. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.3.249.
5
Strategies to intervene on causal systems are adaptively selected.针对因果系统进行干预的策略会被适应性地选择。
Cogn Psychol. 2015 Jun;79:102-33. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.02.004. Epub 2015 May 15.
6
Causal strength induction from time series data.从时间序列数据中推断因果强度。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2018 Apr;147(4):485-513. doi: 10.1037/xge0000423.
7
Stable Causal Relationships Are Better Causal Relationships.稳定的因果关系是更好的因果关系。
Cogn Sci. 2018 May;42(4):1265-1296. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12605. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
8
Inference from explanation.从解释中推断。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Jul;151(7):1481-1501. doi: 10.1037/xge0001151. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
9
Informative experimentation in intuitive science: Children select and learn from their own causal interventions.直观科学中的信息实验:儿童从自身的因果干预中选择并学习。
Cognition. 2020 Aug;201:104315. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104315. Epub 2020 May 17.
10
Learning about causes from people and about people as causes: probabilistic models and social causal reasoning.从人身上学习原因,以及将人视为原因:概率模型和社会因果推理。
Adv Child Dev Behav. 2012;43:125-60. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-397919-3.00005-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Explanations and Causal Judgments Are Differentially Sensitive to Covariation and Mechanism Information.解释和因果判断对共变和机制信息的敏感度不同。
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 1;13:911177. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.911177. eCollection 2022.
2
The Paradox of Time in Dynamic Causal Systems.动态因果系统中的时间悖论。
Entropy (Basel). 2022 Jun 23;24(7):863. doi: 10.3390/e24070863.
3
Causal Structure Learning in Continuous Systems.连续系统中的因果结构学习

本文引用的文献

1
Inferring hidden causal structure.推断潜在因果结构。
Cogn Sci. 2010 Jan;34(1):148-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01072.x. Epub 2009 Oct 27.
2
Causal learning about tolerance and sensitization.关于耐受力和致敏作用的因果学习。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Dec;16(6):1043-9. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.6.1043.
3
Theory-based causal induction.基于理论的因果归纳
Front Psychol. 2020 Feb 20;11:244. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00244. eCollection 2020.
4
How causal information affects decisions.因果信息如何影响决策。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2020 Feb 13;5(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s41235-020-0206-z.
5
From the structure of experience to concepts of structure: How the concept "cause" is attributed to objects and events.从经验结构到结构概念:“原因”这一概念如何被赋予给物体和事件。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019 Apr;148(4):619-643. doi: 10.1037/xge0000594.
6
Successful structure learning from observational data.成功地从观测数据中学习结构。
Cognition. 2018 Oct;179:266-297. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.003. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
7
Causal knowledge promotes behavioral self-regulation: An example using climate change dynamics.因果知识促进行为自我调节:以气候变化动态为例。
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 7;12(9):e0184480. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184480. eCollection 2017.
8
The texture of causal construals: Domain-specific biases shape causal inferences from discourse.因果解释的结构:特定领域的偏见影响话语中的因果推断。
Mem Cognit. 2017 Apr;45(3):442-455. doi: 10.3758/s13421-016-0668-x.
9
A decision network account of reasoning about other people's choices.关于他人选择推理的决策网络解释
Cognition. 2015 Sep;142:12-38. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.05.006. Epub 2015 May 23.
10
Causal inference and the hierarchical structure of experience.因果推断与经验的层次结构。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Dec;143(6):2223-41. doi: 10.1037/a0038192. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
Psychol Rev. 2009 Oct;116(4):661-716. doi: 10.1037/a0017201.
4
Causal learning with local computations.基于局部计算的因果学习
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 May;35(3):678-93. doi: 10.1037/a0014928.
5
The role of learning data in causal reasoning about observations and interventions.学习数据在关于观察和干预的因果推理中的作用。
Mem Cognit. 2009 Apr;37(3):249-64. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.3.249.
6
Bayesian generic priors for causal learning.用于因果学习的贝叶斯通用先验
Psychol Rev. 2008 Oct;115(4):955-84. doi: 10.1037/a0013256.
7
When is a cause the "same"? Coherent generalization across contexts.在何种情况下原因是“相同的”?跨情境的连贯概括。
Psychol Sci. 2007 Nov;18(11):1014-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02017.x.
8
Inferences about unobserved causes in human contingency learning.人类偶然性学习中关于未观察到原因的推理。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2007 Mar;60(3):330-55. doi: 10.1080/17470210601002470.
9
The importance of decision making in causal learning from interventions.决策在从干预中进行因果学习中的重要性。
Mem Cognit. 2006 Mar;34(2):411-9. doi: 10.3758/bf03193418.
10
Time as a guide to cause.以时间推断病因。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 May;32(3):451-60. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.3.451.