Department of Hospital Medicine, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave., MC5000, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Cogn Psychol. 2012 Feb;64(1-2):93-125. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.10.003. Epub 2011 Dec 7.
Seven studies examined how people learn causal relationships in scenarios when the variables are temporally dependent - the states of variables are stable over time. When people intervene on X, and Y subsequently changes state compared to before the intervention, people infer that X influences Y. This strategy allows people to learn causal structures quickly and reliably when variables are temporally stable (Experiments 1 and 2). People use this strategy even when the cover story suggests that the trials are independent (Experiment 3). When observing variables over time, people believe that when a cause changes state, its effects likely change state, but an effect may change state due to an exogenous influence in which case its observed cause may not change state at the same time. People used this strategy to learn the direction of causal relations and a wide variety of causal structures (Experiments 4-6). Finally, considering exogenous influences responsible for the observed changes facilitates learning causal directionality (Experiment 7). Temporal reasoning may be the norm rather than the exception for causal learning and may reflect the way most events are experienced naturalistically.
有七项研究考察了人们在变量具有时间依赖性(变量的状态随时间稳定)的情况下如何学习因果关系。当人们干预 X 时,与干预前相比,Y 随后改变状态,人们推断 X 影响 Y。当变量在时间上稳定时,这种策略可以使人们快速可靠地学习因果结构(实验 1 和实验 2)。即使在掩盖故事表明试验是独立的情况下,人们也会使用这种策略(实验 3)。当随时间观察变量时,人们相信当一个原因改变状态时,它的影响可能也会改变状态,但一个影响可能由于外部影响而改变状态,在这种情况下,其观察到的原因可能不会同时改变状态。人们使用这种策略来学习因果关系的方向和各种因果结构(实验 4-6)。最后,考虑到导致观察到的变化的外部影响有助于学习因果方向(实验 7)。时间推理可能是因果学习的常态而不是例外,并且可能反映了大多数事件在自然状态下被体验的方式。