• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

因果知识促进行为自我调节:以气候变化动态为例。

Causal knowledge promotes behavioral self-regulation: An example using climate change dynamics.

作者信息

Sewell David K, Rayner Peter J, Shank Daniel B, Guy Sophie, Lilburn Simon D, Saber Saam, Kashima Yoshihisa

机构信息

Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Australia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Sep 7;12(9):e0184480. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184480. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0184480
PMID:28880945
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5589253/
Abstract

Adopting successful climate change mitigation policies requires the public to choose how to balance the sometimes competing goals of managing CO2 emissions and achieving economic growth. It follows that collective action on climate change depends on members of the public to be knowledgeable of the causes and economic ramifications of climate change. The existing literature, however, shows that people often struggle to correctly reason about the fundamental accumulation dynamics that drive climate change. Previous research has focused on using analogy to improve people's reasoning about accumulation, which has been met with some success. However, these existing studies have neglected the role economic factors might play in shaping people's decisions in relation to climate change. Here, we introduce a novel iterated decision task in which people attempt to achieve a specific economic goal by interacting with a causal dynamic system in which human economic activities, CO2 emissions, and warming are all causally interrelated. We show that when the causal links between these factors are highlighted, people's ability to achieve the economic goal of the task is enhanced in a way that approaches optimal responding, and avoids dangerous levels of warming.

摘要

采用成功的气候变化缓解政策需要公众选择如何平衡管理二氧化碳排放和实现经济增长这两个有时相互冲突的目标。因此,关于气候变化的集体行动取决于公众成员了解气候变化的成因和经济影响。然而,现有文献表明,人们往往难以正确推断驱动气候变化的基本累积动态。先前的研究侧重于使用类比来改善人们对累积的推理,并且取得了一些成功。然而,这些现有研究忽略了经济因素在塑造人们与气候变化相关决策时可能发挥的作用。在此,我们引入了一种新颖的迭代决策任务,在该任务中,人们试图通过与一个因果动态系统相互作用来实现特定的经济目标,在这个系统中,人类经济活动、二氧化碳排放和气候变暖都存在因果关联。我们表明,当这些因素之间的因果联系被突出显示时,人们实现任务经济目标的能力会以接近最优响应的方式得到增强,并且避免危险的气候变暖水平。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b5a/5589253/3de36427967c/pone.0184480.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b5a/5589253/c4444aeab777/pone.0184480.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b5a/5589253/168732eb1111/pone.0184480.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b5a/5589253/c64f58e9278a/pone.0184480.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b5a/5589253/8be9162701cf/pone.0184480.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b5a/5589253/3de36427967c/pone.0184480.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b5a/5589253/c4444aeab777/pone.0184480.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b5a/5589253/168732eb1111/pone.0184480.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b5a/5589253/c64f58e9278a/pone.0184480.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b5a/5589253/8be9162701cf/pone.0184480.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b5a/5589253/3de36427967c/pone.0184480.g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Causal knowledge promotes behavioral self-regulation: An example using climate change dynamics.因果知识促进行为自我调节:以气候变化动态为例。
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 7;12(9):e0184480. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184480. eCollection 2017.
2
Dynamic linkages among CO emissions, health expenditures, and economic growth: empirical evidence from Pakistan.CO 排放、卫生支出与经济增长的动态联系:来自巴基斯坦的经验证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 May;26(15):15285-15299. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-04876-x. Epub 2019 Mar 30.
3
Well below 2 °C: Mitigation strategies for avoiding dangerous to catastrophic climate changes.远低于 2°C:避免危险到灾难性气候变化的缓解策略。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Sep 26;114(39):10315-10323. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1618481114. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
4
CO emissions and economic growth: Assessing the heterogeneous effects across climate regimes in Africa.二氧化碳排放与经济增长:评估非洲气候制度下的异质影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Jan 15;804:150089. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150089. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
5
Causal relationship between agricultural production and carbon dioxide emissions in selected emerging economies.选定新兴经济体农业生产与二氧化碳排放的因果关系。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Sep;25(25):24764-24777. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-2523-z. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
6
Managing the Budget: Stock-Flow Reasoning and the CO2 Accumulation Problem.管理预算:存量-流量推理与二氧化碳累积问题。
Top Cogn Sci. 2016 Jan;8(1):138-59. doi: 10.1111/tops.12176. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
7
Economic development, climate and values: making policy.经济发展、气候与价值观:制定政策。
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Aug 7;282(1812):20150820. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2015.0820.
8
Tackling air pollution and extreme climate changes in China: Implementing the Paris climate change agreement.应对中国的空气污染和极端气候变化:实施《巴黎气候变化协定》。
Environ Int. 2016 Oct;95:152-6. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2016.04.010. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
9
The Impact of Technological Progress in the Energy Sector on Carbon Emissions: An Empirical Analysis from China.能源部门技术进步对碳排放的影响:来自中国的实证分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Dec 4;14(12):1505. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14121505.
10
Mitigation of global greenhouse gas emissions from waste: conclusions and strategies from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report. Working Group III (Mitigation).减少废弃物产生的全球温室气体排放:政府间气候变化专门委员会(IPCC)第四次评估报告的结论与策略。第三工作组(减缓气候变化)
Waste Manag Res. 2008 Feb;26(1):11-32. doi: 10.1177/0734242X07088433.

引用本文的文献

1
The climate commons dilemma: how can humanity solve the commons dilemma for the global climate commons?气候公地困境:人类如何解决全球气候公地的公地困境?
Clim Change. 2021;164(1):4. doi: 10.1007/s10584-021-02989-2. Epub 2021 Jan 16.
2
Correction: Causal knowledge promotes behavioral self-regulation: An example using climate change dynamics.更正:因果知识促进行为自我调节:一个使用气候变化动态的例子。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 24;15(1):e0228445. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228445. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Managing the Budget: Stock-Flow Reasoning and the CO2 Accumulation Problem.管理预算:存量-流量推理与二氧化碳累积问题。
Top Cogn Sci. 2016 Jan;8(1):138-59. doi: 10.1111/tops.12176. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
2
Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data?亚马逊土耳其机器人:一种新的廉价、高质量数据来源?
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011 Jan;6(1):3-5. doi: 10.1177/1745691610393980. Epub 2011 Feb 3.
3
Political extremism is supported by an illusion of understanding.政治极端主义是建立在一种似是而非的理解之上的。
Psychol Sci. 2013 Jun;24(6):939-46. doi: 10.1177/0956797612464058. Epub 2013 Apr 25.
4
Reasoning about causal relationships: Inferences on causal networks.关于因果关系的推理:因果网络中的推断
Psychol Bull. 2014 Jan;140(1):109-39. doi: 10.1037/a0031903. Epub 2013 Apr 1.
5
Evaluating Amazon's Mechanical Turk as a tool for experimental behavioral research.评估亚马逊土耳其机器人作为实验行为研究工具。
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e57410. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057410. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
6
Probabilistic cost estimates for climate change mitigation.气候变化缓解的概率成本估算。
Nature. 2013 Jan 3;493(7430):79-83. doi: 10.1038/nature11787.
7
Repeated causal decision making.重复因果决策。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Jan;39(1):33-50. doi: 10.1037/a0028643. Epub 2012 Jun 11.
8
Causal structure learning over time: observations and interventions.随时间的因果结构学习:观测与干预。
Cogn Psychol. 2012 Feb;64(1-2):93-125. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.10.003. Epub 2011 Dec 7.
9
Public understanding of climate change in the United States.公众对美国气候变化的认知。
Am Psychol. 2011 May-Jun;66(4):315-28. doi: 10.1037/a0023253.
10
The misunderstood limits of folk science: an illusion of explanatory depth.民间科学的误解性局限:解释深度的错觉
Cogn Sci. 2002 Sep 1;26(5):521-562. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog2605_1.