Sobel David M, Kushnir Tamar
Department of Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912, USA.
Mem Cognit. 2006 Mar;34(2):411-9. doi: 10.3758/bf03193418.
Recent research has focused on how interventions benefit causal learning. This research suggests that the main benefit of interventions is in the temporal and conditional probability information that interventions provide a learner. But when one generates interventions, one must also decide what interventions to generate. In three experiments, we investigated the importance of these decision demands to causal learning. Experiment 1 demonstrated that learners were better at learning causal models when they observed intervention data that they had generated, as opposed to observing data generated by another learner. Experiment 2 demonstrated the same effect between self-generated interventions and interventions learners were forced to make. Experiment 3 demonstrated that when learners observed a sequence of interventions such that the decision-making process that generated those interventions was more readily available, learning was less impaired. These data suggest that decision making may be an important part of causal learning from interventions.
近期的研究聚焦于干预如何有益于因果学习。这项研究表明,干预的主要益处在于干预为学习者提供的时间和条件概率信息。但是,当一个人进行干预时,还必须决定要进行何种干预。在三项实验中,我们研究了这些决策要求对因果学习的重要性。实验1表明,学习者在观察自己生成的干预数据时,比观察其他学习者生成的数据时,能更好地学习因果模型。实验2表明,在自我生成的干预和学习者被迫进行的干预之间也存在同样的效果。实验3表明,当学习者观察一系列干预,使得生成这些干预的决策过程更容易理解时,学习受到的损害就较小。这些数据表明,决策可能是从干预中进行因果学习的一个重要部分。