• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心肌瘢痕对心脏再同步治疗结局的影响:范围还是位置?

Impact of myocardial scarring on outcomes of cardiac resynchronization therapy: extent or location?

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.

出版信息

J Nucl Med. 2012 Jan;53(1):47-54. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.111.095448. Epub 2011 Dec 12.

DOI:10.2967/jnumed.111.095448
PMID:22159181
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Refining the criteria for patient selection for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) may improve its outcomes. The study objective was to determine the effect of scar location, scar burden, and left ventricular (LV) lead position on CRT outcomes.

METHODS

The study included 213 consecutive CRT recipients with radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging before CRT between January 2002 and December 2008. Scar localization and myocardial viability were analyzed using a 17-segment model and a 5-point semiquantitative scale. New York Heart Association (NYHA) class and echocardiography were assessed before and after CRT. The anatomic LV lead location in the 17-segment model was assessed by review of fluoroscopic cinegrams in right and left anterior oblique views. As in published studies, clinical response was defined as an absolute improvement in LV ejection fraction of ≥5 percentage points after CRT.

RESULTS

A total of 651 scar segments was identified in 213 patients. Eighty-three percent of scar segments were located in the LV anterior, posterior, septal, and apical regions, whereas 84% of LV leads were in the lateral wall. Only 11% of LV leads were positioned in scar segments. The extent of scarring was significantly higher in nonresponders than in responders (18.0% vs. 6%, P = 0.001). Compared with patients with scarring >22%, patients ≤70 y with scarring ≤22% of the left ventricle had a greater increase in LV ejection fraction (10.1% ± 10.5% vs. 0.8% ± 6.1%; P < 0.001) and improvement in NYHA class (-0.9 ± 0.7 vs. -0.5 ± 0.8; P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

LV leads were often located in viable myocardial regions. Less scar burden was associated with a greater improvement in heart failure but only in relatively younger CRT recipients.

摘要

目的

确定瘢痕位置、瘢痕负荷和左心室(LV)导线位置对心脏再同步治疗(CRT)结果的影响。

方法

本研究纳入了 2002 年 1 月至 2008 年 12 月期间 213 例 CRT 前接受放射性核素心肌灌注成像的连续 CRT 受者。采用 17 节段模型和 5 分半定量评分分析瘢痕定位和心肌活力。在 CRT 前后评估纽约心脏协会(NYHA)心功能分级和超声心动图。通过回顾右前斜位和左前斜位的透视电影片评估 17 节段模型中 LV 导线的解剖位置。与已发表的研究一样,临床反应定义为 CRT 后 LV 射血分数绝对值增加≥5%。

结果

共识别出 213 例患者的 651 个瘢痕节段。83%的瘢痕节段位于 LV 前壁、后壁、间隔和心尖区,而 84%的 LV 导线位于侧壁。只有 11%的 LV 导线位于瘢痕节段。无反应者的瘢痕程度明显高于有反应者(18.0%比 6%,P=0.001)。与瘢痕>22%的患者相比,≤70 岁且瘢痕≤22%的患者的 LV 射血分数增加更大(10.1%±10.5%比 0.8%±6.1%;P<0.001),NYHA 心功能分级改善更大(-0.9±0.7比-0.5±0.8;P=0.02)。

结论

LV 导线通常位于存活心肌区域。瘢痕负荷较小与心力衰竭改善更大相关,但仅见于相对较年轻的 CRT 受者。

相似文献

1
Impact of myocardial scarring on outcomes of cardiac resynchronization therapy: extent or location?心肌瘢痕对心脏再同步治疗结局的影响:范围还是位置?
J Nucl Med. 2012 Jan;53(1):47-54. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.111.095448. Epub 2011 Dec 12.
2
Influence of pacing site characteristics on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.起搏部位特征对心脏再同步治疗反应的影响。
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Jul;6(4):542-50. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.111.000146. Epub 2013 Jun 5.
3
Left ventricular lead position for cardiac resynchronization: a comprehensive cinegraphic, echocardiographic, clinical, and survival analysis.左心室导联位置在心脏再同步治疗中的作用:综合电影造影、超声心动图、临床和生存分析。
Europace. 2012 Aug;14(8):1139-47. doi: 10.1093/europace/eus045. Epub 2012 Mar 30.
4
Transmural Myocardial Scar Assessed by Cardiac Computed Tomography: Predictor of Echocardiographic Versus Clinical Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy?心脏计算机断层扫描评估的透壁心肌瘢痕:超声心动图与心脏再同步治疗临床反应的预测指标?
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2019 Mar/Apr;43(2):312-316. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000824.
5
Impact of scar burden by single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging on patient outcomes following cardiac resynchronization therapy.单光子发射计算机断层心肌灌注显像瘢痕负荷对心脏再同步化治疗后患者结局的影响。
Eur Heart J. 2011 Jan;32(1):93-103. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq389. Epub 2010 Oct 22.
6
Left ventricular lead position, mechanical activation, and myocardial scar in relation to left ventricular reverse remodeling and clinical outcomes after cardiac resynchronization therapy: A feature-tracking and contrast-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance study.左心室导线位置、机械激活与心肌瘢痕在心衰心脏再同步化治疗后左心室逆重构及临床转归中的关系:特征追踪和对比增强心血管磁共振研究。
Heart Rhythm. 2016 Feb;13(2):481-9. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.10.024. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
7
Scar burden by myocardial perfusion imaging predicts echocardiographic response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in ischemic cardiomyopathy.心肌灌注成像评估的瘢痕负荷可预测缺血性心肌病患者心脏再同步治疗的超声心动图反应。
Am Heart J. 2007 Jan;153(1):105-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2006.10.015.
8
Influence of left ventricular lead position relative to scar location on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: a model study.左心室导线位置相对于瘢痕位置对心脏再同步治疗反应的影响:模型研究。
Europace. 2014 Nov;16 Suppl 4:iv62-iv68. doi: 10.1093/europace/euu231.
9
Dependency of cardiac resynchronization therapy on myocardial viability at the LV lead position.左心室起搏部位心肌存活性对心脏再同步治疗的依赖性。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011 Apr;4(4):366-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.01.010.
10
The association of left ventricular lead position related to regional scar by speckle-tracking echocardiography with clinical outcomes in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy.通过斑点追踪超声心动图评估左心室导线位置与区域瘢痕的关系及其对接受心脏再同步治疗患者临床结局的影响。
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2014 Jun;27(6):648-56. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2014.01.025. Epub 2014 Mar 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Viability Test in Prediction of Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.预测心脏再同步治疗反应的生存能力测试
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 29;14(15):5341. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155341.
2
Exploring QRS Area beyond Patient Selection in CRT-Can It Guide Left Ventricular Lead Placement?在心脏再同步治疗中探索除患者选择之外的QRS波面积——它能指导左心室导线放置吗?
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024 Jan 11;11(1):18. doi: 10.3390/jcdd11010018.
3
Prediction of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Response Using a Lead Placement Score Derived From 4-Dimensional Computed Tomography.
基于 4D-CT 构建的导线位置评分预测心脏再同步治疗反应
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Aug;15(8):e014165. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.122.014165. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
4
State-of-the-art narrative review: multimodality imaging in electrophysiology and cardiac device therapies.前沿叙述性综述:电生理学和心脏设备治疗中的多模态成像
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2021 Jun;11(3):881-895. doi: 10.21037/cdt-20-724.
5
What Are the Expectations for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy? A Validation of Two Response Definitions.心脏再同步治疗的期望是什么?两种反应定义的验证。
J Clin Med. 2021 Feb 1;10(3):514. doi: 10.3390/jcm10030514.
6
Evaluation of dyssynchrony with nuclear cardiac imaging: New evidence for an old parameter.利用核素心脏成像评估不同步:旧参数的新证据。
J Nucl Cardiol. 2022 Jun;29(3):1254-1256. doi: 10.1007/s12350-020-02521-6. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
7
Repetitive optimizing left ventricular pacing configurations with quadripolar leads improves response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: A single-center randomized clinical trial.使用四极导线重复优化左心室起搏配置可改善心脏再同步治疗的反应:一项单中心随机临床试验。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Sep;96(37):e8066. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008066.
8
Scar burden assessed by Selvester QRS score predicts prognosis, not CRT clinical benefit in preventing heart failure event and death: A MADIT-CRT sub-study.通过塞尔维斯特QRS评分评估的瘢痕负担可预测预后,但不能预测心脏再同步治疗(CRT)预防心力衰竭事件和死亡的临床获益:一项MADIT-CRT子研究。
J Electrocardiol. 2016 Jul-Aug;49(4):603-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2016.04.008. Epub 2016 May 2.
9
Survival analysis and regression models.生存分析与回归模型。
J Nucl Cardiol. 2014 Aug;21(4):686-94. doi: 10.1007/s12350-014-9908-2. Epub 2014 May 9.
10
Impact of myocardial viability assessed by myocardial perfusion imaging on ventricular tachyarrhythmias in cardiac resynchronization therapy.心肌灌注显像评估心肌存活性对心脏再同步治疗中室性心律失常的影响。
J Nucl Cardiol. 2013 Dec;20(6):1049-59. doi: 10.1007/s12350-013-9795-y. Epub 2013 Oct 18.