Centre for Pain Research, The University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.
J Pediatr Psychol. 2012 Apr;37(3):262-71. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsr100. Epub 2011 Dec 12.
To analyze content and quality of headache, abdominal pain, and dysmenorrhoea websites, and to thematically analyze online pain forums.
Websites offering support, advice, or information regarding pain were explored. Websites were analyzed quantitatively using the Health-Related Website Evaluation Form and the DISCERN scale. Websites containing forum functions were thematically analysed assessing how the Internet is used for support and advice.
63 websites were included. Few websites scored in the upper quartiles of scores on the measures. 7 websites contained supportive posts, pertaining only to dysmenorrhoea. The ways users cope and the coping judgements of other forum users are presented thematically. 3 themes emerged: (1) passively engaged postings, (2) actively engaged postings, and (3) reactively engaged postings.
Internet pain resources are of low quality and questionable value in providing help to adolescents. Future research should explore how to improve quality.
分析头痛、腹痛和痛经网站的内容和质量,并对在线疼痛论坛进行主题分析。
探索提供疼痛支持、建议或信息的网站。使用健康相关网站评估表和 DISCERN 量表对网站进行定量分析。对具有论坛功能的网站进行主题分析,评估互联网在支持和建议方面的使用情况。
共纳入 63 个网站。少数网站在评分措施的上四分位数得分。7 个网站包含与痛经相关的支持性帖子。以主题形式呈现用户应对方式和其他论坛用户的应对判断。出现了 3 个主题:(1)被动参与的帖子,(2)积极参与的帖子,和(3)反应性参与的帖子。
互联网疼痛资源的质量较低,在为青少年提供帮助方面的价值值得怀疑。未来的研究应该探索如何提高质量。