• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

员工培训干预对成人住院精神科病房隔离率的影响。

Effects of a Staff Training Intervention on Seclusion Rates on an Adult Inpatient Psychiatric Unit.

作者信息

Newman Julie, Paun Olimpia, Fogg Louis

出版信息

J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2018 Jun 1;56(6):23-30. doi: 10.3928/02793695-20180212-02. Epub 2018 Feb 16.

DOI:10.3928/02793695-20180212-02
PMID:29447413
Abstract

The current article presents the effects of a 90-minute staff training intervention aimed at reducing inpatient psychiatric seclusion rates through strengthened staff commitment to seclusion alternatives and improved de-escalation skills. The intervention occurred at an 18-bed adult inpatient psychiatric unit whose seclusion rates in 2015 were seven times the national average. Although the project's primary outcome compared patient seclusion rates before and after the intervention, anonymous staff surveys measured several secondary outcomes. Seclusion rates were reduced from a 6-month pre-intervention average of 2.95 seclusion hours per 1,000 patient hours to a 6-month post-intervention average of 0.29 seclusion hours per 1,000 patient hours, a 90.2% reduction. Completed staff surveys showed significant staff knowledge gains, non-significant changes in staff attitudes about seclusion, non-significant changes in staff de-escalation skill confidence, and use of the new resource sheet by only 17% of staff. The key study implication is that time-limited, focused staff training interventions can have a measurable impact on reducing inpatient seclusion rates. [Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, 56(6), 23-30.].

摘要

本文介绍了一项为期90分钟的员工培训干预措施的效果,该措施旨在通过加强员工对隔离替代方案的承诺和提高缓和技能来降低住院精神病患者的隔离率。干预发生在一个拥有18张床位的成人住院精神病科,该科室2015年的隔离率是全国平均水平的7倍。尽管该项目的主要结果是比较干预前后患者的隔离率,但匿名员工调查测量了几个次要结果。隔离率从干预前6个月每1000患者小时2.95个隔离小时的平均水平降至干预后6个月每1000患者小时0.29个隔离小时的平均水平,降低了90.2%。完成的员工调查显示,员工知识有显著增加,员工对隔离的态度没有显著变化,员工缓和技能信心没有显著变化,只有17%的员工使用了新的资源表。该研究的关键启示是,限时、有针对性的员工培训干预措施可以对降低住院患者隔离率产生可衡量的影响。[《心理社会护理与精神卫生服务杂志》,56(6),23 - 30。]

相似文献

1
Effects of a Staff Training Intervention on Seclusion Rates on an Adult Inpatient Psychiatric Unit.员工培训干预对成人住院精神科病房隔离率的影响。
J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2018 Jun 1;56(6):23-30. doi: 10.3928/02793695-20180212-02. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
2
Association of empathy of nursing staff with reduction of seclusion and restraint in psychiatric inpatient care.精神科住院护理中护理人员的同理心与减少隔离和约束的关联。
Psychiatr Serv. 2014 Feb 1;65(2):251-4. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201200531.
3
Improving seclusion practice: implications of a review of staff and patient views.改善隔离实践:员工和患者观点综述的启示。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2013 Apr;20(3):203-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2012.01903.x. Epub 2012 Jul 16.
4
Applying sensory modulation to mental health inpatient care to reduce seclusion and restraint: a case control study.将感觉调节应用于精神科住院护理以减少隔离和约束:一项病例对照研究。
Nord J Psychiatry. 2017 Oct;71(7):525-528. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2017.1346142. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
5
The Engagement Model for reducing seclusion and restraint: 13 years later.减少隔离与约束的参与模式:13年后。
J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2015 Mar;53(3):39-45. doi: 10.3928/02793695-20150211-01.
6
Seclusion Reduction on an Adult Inpatient Psychiatric Unit: A Quality Improvement Project.减少成人精神科住院患者的隔离:一项质量改进项目。
J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2022 Jun;60(6):27-32. doi: 10.3928/02793695-20211118-05. Epub 2021 Dec 3.
7
[Duration of seclusion and exit of the seclusion room, study of the impact of anamnestic and institutional factors].[隔离时长与隔离室出院情况,既往史及机构因素影响的研究]
Encephale. 2020 Jun;46(3):184-189. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2019.10.005. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
8
The mentally ill and social exclusion: a critical examination of the use of seclusion from the patient's perspective.精神疾病患者与社会排斥:从患者视角对隔离使用情况的批判性审视。
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2004 Sep;25(6):559-78. doi: 10.1080/01612840490472101.
9
Reducing seclusion use in an Australian child and adolescent psychiatric inpatient unit.减少澳大利亚儿童和青少年精神科住院病房的隔离使用情况。
J Affect Disord. 2022 May 15;305:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.02.066. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
10
Use of Modified Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports in a Psychiatric Inpatient Unit for High-Risk Youths.改良的积极行为干预与支持措施在精神科住院部针对高危青少年的应用。
Psychiatr Serv. 2016 May 1;67(5):570-3. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201500039. Epub 2016 Feb 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of video-based trauma-informed care training for nursing staff on seclusion and restraint of psychiatric inpatients: A non-randomized controlled study.基于视频的创伤知情护理培训对精神科住院患者隔离与约束的影响:一项非随机对照研究。
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2025 Jan 22;8:100297. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2025.100297. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Patient safety in inpatient mental health settings: a systematic review.住院精神卫生机构中的患者安全:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 23;9(12):e030230. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030230.
3
Measures to Avoid Coercion in Psychiatry and Their Efficacy.
避免精神病学中强制手段的措施及其效果。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2019 May 10;116(19):336-343. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2019.0336.