Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2012 Dec;17(5):651-69. doi: 10.1007/s10459-011-9341-0. Epub 2011 Dec 10.
Interprofessional education (IPE) for health and social care students may improve attitudes toward IPE and interprofessional collaboration (IPC). The quality of research on the association between IPE and attitudes is mediocre and IPE effect sizes are unknown. Students at a college in Toronto, Canada, attended an IPE workshop. A comparison group of non-attenders was formed. Both groups completed pre- and post-workshop questionnaires and two measurement scales for IPE attitudes-the Interprofessional Education Perceptions Scale and the University of West England questionnaire. Eight multiple linear regressions modeled post-workshop attitude scores as a function of workshop attendance, pre-workshop attitudes, and background factors. Workshop effect sizes and relative importance of variables were estimated. Published results were used to calculate IPE effect sizes in other studies. Pre-workshop measures of post-workshop attitudes were dominant, positive predictors of outcomes; other predictors were subordinate to them. The relationship between workshop attendance and IPE attitudes was positive in seven models, statistically significant in four (P < 0.05), and not statistically significant in four. In hierarchical regressions the average workshop effect was small, about 0.08 in ΔR(2) terms, amounting to about one-quarter of a model's explained variance. The workshop was associated with improved IPE and IPC attitudes in some domains but not others. The results should help educators focus IPE efforts on IPE/IPC attitudes where small, short-term improvements can be obtained.
跨专业教育(IPE)对卫生和社会保健专业的学生可能会改善他们对 IPE 和跨专业合作(IPC)的态度。IPE 与态度之间关联的研究质量一般,IPE 效果大小也未知。加拿大多伦多一所学院的学生参加了 IPE 研讨会。同时组成了一个未参加的对照组。两组都在研讨会前和研讨会后完成了问卷和两个 IPE 态度量表——IPE 认知量表和西英格兰大学问卷。八项多元线性回归将研讨会后的态度分数建模为研讨会出席情况、研讨会前的态度以及背景因素的函数。估计了研讨会的效果大小和变量的相对重要性。使用已发表的结果计算了其他研究中的 IPE 效果大小。研讨会前对研讨会后态度的衡量标准是结果的主要、积极预测因素;其他预测因素则处于次要地位。在七个模型中,研讨会出席与 IPE 态度之间存在积极关系,其中四个在统计学上具有显著性(P < 0.05),而四个则不具有统计学显著性。在分层回归中,平均研讨会效果较小,约为 0.08,占模型解释方差的四分之一左右。该研讨会与某些领域的 IPE 和 IPC 态度的改善有关,但在其他领域则没有。结果应该有助于教育者将 IPE 工作重点放在可以获得小而短期改善的 IPE/IPC 态度上。