• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

本科学生对基于模拟的跨专业课程的看法和态度:KidSIM 态度问卷。

Undergraduate students' perceptions of and attitudes toward a simulation-based interprofessional curriculum: the KidSIM ATTITUDES questionnaire.

机构信息

Department of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

出版信息

Simul Healthc. 2012 Dec;7(6):353-8. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e318264499e.

DOI:10.1097/SIH.0b013e318264499e
PMID:22902608
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Existing attitude scales on interprofessional education (IPE) focus on students' attitudes toward the concepts of teamwork and opportunities for IPE but fail to examine student perceptions of the learning modality that also plays an important role in the teaching and learning process. The purpose of this present study was to test the psychometric characteristics of the KidSIM Attitude Towards Teamwork in Training Undergoing Designed Educational Simulation (ATTITUDES) questionnaire developed to measure student perceptions of and attitudes toward IPE, teamwork, and simulation as a learning modality.

METHODS

A total of 196 medical, nursing, and respiratory therapy students received a 3-hour IPE curriculum module that focused on 2 simulation-based team training scenarios in emergency and intensive care unit settings. Each multiprofessional group of students completed the 30-item ATTITUDES questionnaire before participating in the IPE curriculum and the same questionnaire again as a posttest on completion of the high-fidelity simulation, team-based learning sessions.

RESULTS

The internal reliability of the ATTITUDES questionnaire was α = 0.95. The factor analysis supports a 5-factor solution accounting for 61.6% of the variance: communication (8 items), relevance of IPE (7 items), relevance of simulation (5 items), roles and responsibilities (6 items), and situation awareness (4 items). Aggregated and profession-specific analysis of students' responses using paired sample t tests showed significant differences from the pretest to the posttest for all questionnaire items and subscale measures (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The KidSIM ATTITUDES questionnaire provides a reliable and construct valid measure of student perceptions of and attitudes toward IPE, teamwork, and simulation as a learning modality.

摘要

简介

现有的关于医学生团队合作和参与医学生团队合作机会的态度量表,仅关注学生对团队合作概念的态度,而未能考察学生对学习模式的看法,而学习模式在教学过程中也起着重要作用。本研究的目的是测试 KidSIM 态度量表(ATTITUDES)的心理测量学特征,该量表旨在衡量学生对医学生团队合作、团队合作和模拟作为一种学习模式的看法和态度。

方法

共有 196 名医学生、护理专业学生和呼吸治疗专业学生接受了 3 小时的医学生团队合作课程模块,该模块侧重于急诊和重症监护环境中的 2 个基于模拟的团队培训场景。每一组多专业学生在参与医学生团队合作课程之前完成 30 项 ATTITUDES 问卷,在完成高保真模拟、团队学习课程后再次完成该问卷作为后测。

结果

ATTITUDES 问卷的内部可靠性为α=0.95。因素分析支持 5 因素解决方案,占总方差的 61.6%:沟通(8 项)、医学生团队合作的相关性(7 项)、模拟的相关性(5 项)、角色和责任(6 项)和情境意识(4 项)。使用配对样本 t 检验对学生的总体和专业特定反应进行分析,显示所有问卷项目和子量表测量的前后测之间差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。

结论

KidSIM ATTITUDES 问卷提供了一种可靠且具有结构有效性的测量工具,可用于衡量学生对医学生团队合作、团队合作和模拟作为一种学习模式的看法和态度。

相似文献

1
Undergraduate students' perceptions of and attitudes toward a simulation-based interprofessional curriculum: the KidSIM ATTITUDES questionnaire.本科学生对基于模拟的跨专业课程的看法和态度:KidSIM 态度问卷。
Simul Healthc. 2012 Dec;7(6):353-8. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e318264499e.
2
A longitudinal study of the effect of an interprofessional education curriculum on student satisfaction and attitudes towards interprofessional teamwork and education.一项关于跨专业教育课程对学生满意度以及对跨专业团队合作和教育态度的影响的纵向研究。
J Interprof Care. 2010 Jan;24(1):41-52. doi: 10.3109/13561820903011927.
3
Development of a team performance scale to assess undergraduate health professionals.团队绩效评估量表的制定,以评估本科卫生专业人员。
Acad Med. 2013 Jul;88(7):989-96. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318294fd45.
4
Interprofessional education and collaborative practice: Psychometric analysis of the Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale in undergraduate Serbian healthcare student context.跨专业教育与合作实践:塞尔维亚本科医疗保健专业学生的跨专业学习准备度量表的心理计量学分析。
Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Jun;65:74-80. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.03.002. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
5
Interprofessional clinical training for undergraduate students in an emergency department setting.在急诊环境下对本科生进行的跨专业临床培训。
J Interprof Care. 2012 Jul;26(4):319-25. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2012.676109. Epub 2012 Apr 17.
6
Getting a head start: high-fidelity, simulation-based operating room team training of interprofessional students.提前起步:基于高保真模拟的跨专业学生手术室团队培训。
J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Jan;218(1):140-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.09.006. Epub 2013 Oct 31.
7
Conceptualizing Interprofessional Teams as Multi-Team Systems-Implications for Assessment and Training.将跨专业团队概念化为多团队系统——对评估和培训的启示
Teach Learn Med. 2015;27(4):366-9. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2015.1077136.
8
The impact of an interprofessional problem-based learning curriculum of clinical ethics on medical and nursing students' attitudes and ability of interprofessional collaboration: a pilot study.跨专业以问题为基础的临床伦理课程对医学生和护生的态度和跨专业合作能力的影响:一项试点研究。
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2013 Sep;29(9):505-11. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2013.05.006. Epub 2013 Jun 25.
9
Changes in attitudes toward interprofessional health care teams and education in the first- and third-year undergraduate students.医学生对跨专业医疗团队和教育的态度变化:本科一、三年级学生的对比
J Interprof Care. 2012 Mar;26(2):100-7. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2011.644355. Epub 2012 Jan 17.
10
Perceptions of interprofessional clinical simulation among medical and nursing students: A pilot study.医学和护理专业学生对跨专业临床模拟的认知:一项试点研究。
J Interprof Care. 2015;29(5):504-6. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2015.1027336. Epub 2015 Jun 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceptions regarding attitude towards simulation-based learning among nursing students in Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study.沙特阿拉伯护理专业学生对基于模拟的学习的态度认知:一项横断面研究。
Belitung Nurs J. 2024 Oct 14;10(5):578-584. doi: 10.33546/bnj.3438. eCollection 2024.
2
Situational simulation teaching effectively improves dental students' non-operational clinical competency and objective structured clinical examination performance.情境模拟教学能有效提高口腔医学生非临床操作技能和客观结构化临床考试成绩。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 May 14;24(1):533. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05546-4.
3
Validation of a short version of the high-fidelity simulation satisfaction scale in nursing students.
护理专业学生中高保真模拟满意度量表简版的验证
BMC Nurs. 2023 Sep 28;22(1):344. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01515-2.
4
Development of pediatric simulation-based education - a systematic review.基于模拟的儿科医学教育发展——一项系统综述
BMC Nurs. 2023 Aug 28;22(1):291. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01458-8.
5
Investigating the Effects of Intraprofessional Learning in Nursing Education: Protocol for a Longitudinal Study.探究护理教育中专业内学习的效果:一项纵向研究方案
Nurs Rep. 2023 Apr 17;13(2):740-750. doi: 10.3390/nursrep13020065.
6
A Literature Study of Medical Simulations for Non-Technical Skills Training in Emergency Medicine: Twenty Years of Progress, an Integrated Research Framework, and Future Research Avenues.医学模拟在急诊非技术技能培训中的文献研究:二十年的进展、综合研究框架和未来研究方向。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 2;20(5):4487. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054487.
7
Health Sciences Students' Attitude, Perception, and Experience of Using Educational Simulation in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.沙特阿拉伯健康科学专业学生对使用教育模拟的态度、认知和体验:一项横断面研究。
Nurs Rep. 2022 Aug 26;12(3):620-628. doi: 10.3390/nursrep12030061.
8
Interprofessional Simulation Olympics as a platform to assess team work knowledge acquisition.跨专业模拟奥运会作为评估团队合作知识获取的平台。
BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2015 Jul 2;1(2):49-53. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2015-000024. eCollection 2015.
9
Combining medical, physiotherapy and nursing undergraduates in high-fidelity simulation: determining students' perceptions.将医学、物理治疗和护理专业本科生纳入高仿真模拟教学:了解学生的看法
BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2018 Jan 30;5(2):108-110. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2017-000286. eCollection 2019.
10
Team Training of Inter-Professional Students (TTIPS) for improving teamwork.跨专业学生团队培训(TTIPS)以提高团队合作能力。
BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2017 Oct 3;3(4):127-134. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2017-000194. eCollection 2017.