Department of Surgery, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, The Fourth Military Medical University, No. 127 Changle West Road, 710032, Xian, China.
J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Apr;16(4):738-43. doi: 10.1007/s11605-011-1796-z. Epub 2011 Dec 9.
Totally laparoscopic gastrectomy represents the evolution of laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy. Most surgeons prefer laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy rather than totally laparoscopic procedures because of technical difficulties of intracorporeal anastomosis. We created one novel stapling anastomosis without hand-sewn technique in totally laparoscopic Billroth II gastrectomy. The feasibility and early surgical outcomes of totally laparoscopic Billroth II gastrectomy with stapling anastomosis and with hand-sewn anastomosis were introduced in this study.
We retrospectively analyzed early surgical outcomes in 70 patients who underwent totally laparoscopic Billroth II distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer between January 2010 and July 2011. The patients were divided into hand-sewn and device groups according to whether intracorporeal anastomosis was performed by only hand-sewn technique (n = 36) or only stapling devices (n = 34). In the device group, the gastrojejunostomy was performed using a circular stapler, and an additional side-to-side jejunojejunostomy was made at the site of jejunal enterotomy.
There was no difference in the mean number of lymph nodes retrieved in both groups. The blood loss (hand-sewn group 205.8 ± 37.4 vs. device group 201.2 ± 51.2 ml, p > 0.05) and hospital stay (hand-sewn group 6.5 ± 3.7 vs. device group 5.9 ± 4.1 days, p > 0.05) were similar in both groups. We found that intracorporeal anastomosis by totally stapling devices was associated with decreased operative time (hand-sewn group 239.0 ± 40.1 vs. device group 203.6 ± 27.9 min, p < 0.05).
We suggest that intracorporeal anastomosis using only stapling devices in the described method was as safe and feasible as by hand-sewn technique. Moreover, it is a simple and time-saving method without any difficult hand-sewn procedures.
全腹腔镜胃切除术代表了腹腔镜辅助胃切除术的发展。由于腔内吻合的技术难度,大多数外科医生更喜欢腹腔镜辅助胃切除术而不是全腹腔镜手术。我们在全腹腔镜 Billroth II 胃大部切除术中创建了一种新型的吻合方法,无需手工缝合技术。本研究介绍了使用吻合器吻合和手工吻合的全腹腔镜 Billroth II 胃大部切除术的可行性和早期手术结果。
我们回顾性分析了 2010 年 1 月至 2011 年 7 月期间 70 例接受全腹腔镜 Billroth II 远端胃切除术治疗胃癌的患者的早期手术结果。根据是否仅采用手工缝合技术(n=36)或仅吻合器(n=34)进行腔内吻合,将患者分为手工缝合和器械组。在器械组中,使用圆形吻合器进行胃空肠吻合,并且在空肠切开部位额外进行侧侧空肠空肠吻合。
两组淋巴结检出数无差异。两组术中出血量(手工缝合组 205.8±37.4 ml 与器械组 201.2±51.2 ml,p>0.05)和住院时间(手工缝合组 6.5±3.7 天与器械组 5.9±4.1 天,p>0.05)相似。我们发现,使用全吻合器进行腔内吻合与手术时间缩短相关(手工缝合组 239.0±40.1 min 与器械组 203.6±27.9 min,p<0.05)。
我们认为,如所述方法仅使用吻合器进行腔内吻合与手工缝合技术一样安全可行。此外,它是一种简单且节省时间的方法,无需任何困难的手工缝合操作。