• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

奶牛场工人腕管综合征的患病率。

Prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome among dairy workers.

机构信息

Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.

出版信息

Am J Ind Med. 2012 Feb;55(2):127-35. doi: 10.1002/ajim.21995. Epub 2011 Dec 7.

DOI:10.1002/ajim.21995
PMID:22161867
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) among dairy workers.

METHODS

Sixty-six dairy parlor workers and 58 non-parlor workers at dairies in Texas, New Mexico, and Colorado participated in structured interviews regarding demographics, work history, and hand symptoms. All participants had nerve conduction studies performed on both hands across the carpal tunnel. A CTS case definition was based on the presence of characteristic CTS symptoms and an abnormal median mononeuropathy across the carpal tunnel.

RESULTS

The prevalence of CTS among the dairy parlor workers was 16.6% and 3.6% among non-parlor workers. The difference was found to be statistically significant (P < 0.05) with an odds ratio of 5.3, CI (1.1-25.5).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study indicate that CTS is a significant challenge for dairy parlor workers. The prevalence of CTS was found to be significantly higher among dairy workers performing tasks in the milking parlor as opposed to workers performing tasks in other areas of the dairy farm. The results emphasize the need for administrative and engineering controls to limit the exposure to physical risk factors that are associated with upper limb disorders such as CTS.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在确定奶牛场工人中腕管综合征(CTS)的患病率。

方法

得克萨斯州、新墨西哥州和科罗拉多州的奶牛场的 66 名奶牛场工人和 58 名非奶牛场工人参加了有关人口统计学、工作史和手部症状的结构化访谈。所有参与者均在手部腕管处进行了正中神经传导研究。CTS 病例定义基于典型 CTS 症状和腕管处正中神经单神经病异常。

结果

奶牛场工人中 CTS 的患病率为 16.6%,非奶牛场工人为 3.6%。差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),优势比为 5.3,CI(1.1-25.5)。

结论

本研究结果表明 CTS 是奶牛场工人面临的重大挑战。在挤奶厅从事工作的奶牛场工人中 CTS 的患病率明显高于在奶牛场其他区域从事工作的工人。结果强调需要采取管理和工程控制措施,以限制与上肢疾病(如 CTS)相关的物理危险因素的暴露。

相似文献

1
Prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome among dairy workers.奶牛场工人腕管综合征的患病率。
Am J Ind Med. 2012 Feb;55(2):127-35. doi: 10.1002/ajim.21995. Epub 2011 Dec 7.
2
Carpal tunnel syndrome among apprentice construction workers.建筑行业学徒工的腕管综合征
Am J Ind Med. 2002 Aug;42(2):107-16. doi: 10.1002/ajim.10093.
3
Carpal tunnel syndrome in male visual display terminal (VDT) workers.男性视屏显示终端(VDT)工作者的腕管综合征
Am J Ind Med. 2007 Jan;50(1):1-7. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20396.
4
Course of symptoms and median nerve conduction values in workers performing repetitive jobs at risk for carpal tunnel syndrome.从事有患腕管综合征风险的重复性工作的工人的症状病程及正中神经传导值
Occup Med (Lond). 2006 Mar;56(2):115-21. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqj007. Epub 2005 Dec 21.
5
Carpal tunnel syndrome among ewe dairy farmers in Sardinia, Italy.意大利撒丁岛奶羊养殖女工的腕管综合征。
Am J Ind Med. 2013 Aug;56(8):889-96. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22153. Epub 2013 Jan 8.
6
Prevalence of musculoskeletal symptoms and carpal tunnel syndrome among dental hygienists.牙科保健员中肌肉骨骼症状和腕管综合征的患病率。
Am J Ind Med. 2002 Sep;42(3):248-57. doi: 10.1002/ajim.10110.
7
Carpal tunnel syndrome in repetitive work: a follow-up study.重复性工作中的腕管综合征:一项随访研究。
Am J Ind Med. 2002 Oct;42(4):344-53. doi: 10.1002/ajim.10115.
8
Prevalence, incidence and risk factors of carpal tunnel syndrome in a large footwear factory.一家大型制鞋厂中腕管综合征的患病率、发病率及危险因素
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2001;14(4):357-67.
9
Workplace and individual risk factors for carpal tunnel syndrome.工作场所和个体危险因素与腕管综合征。
Occup Environ Med. 2011 Dec;68(12):928-33. doi: 10.1136/oem.2010.063677. Epub 2011 May 25.
10
[Hand-arm vibration syndrome and upper limb disorders associated with forestry work].[手臂振动综合征及与林业工作相关的上肢疾病]
Med Lav. 2004 Jul-Aug;95(4):282-96.

引用本文的文献

1
Global and Regional Prevalence of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis Based on a Systematic Review.腕管综合征的全球及区域患病率:基于系统评价的Meta分析
Musculoskeletal Care. 2024 Dec;22(4):e70024. doi: 10.1002/msc.70024.
2
Carpal tunnel syndrome among milking parlor workers in Northern Italy: a comparison of screening approaches.意大利北部挤奶厅工人的腕管综合征:筛选方法的比较。
Med Lav. 2019 Aug 26;110(4):271-277. doi: 10.23749/mdl.v110i4.8359.
3
Personal and occupational factors contributing to biomechanical risk of the distal upper limb among dairy workers in the Lombardy region of Italy.
意大利伦巴第地区乳制品工人上肢远端发生生物力学风险的个人和职业因素。
Appl Ergon. 2020 Feb;83:102796. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.12.013. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
4
Optimizing implementation of interventions in agriculture for occupational upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders: Results of an expert panel.优化农业干预措施以预防职业性上肢肌肉骨骼疾病:专家小组的结果
Work. 2018;61(3):413-420. doi: 10.3233/WOR-182806.
5
Assessing the effects of biomechanical overload on dairy parlor workers' wrist: Definition of a study approach and preliminary results.评估生物力学过载对挤奶厅工人手腕的影响:一种研究方法的定义及初步结果。
Work. 2016;55(4):747-756. doi: 10.3233/WOR-162462.
6
Risk Factors for Developing Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders during Dairy Farming.奶牛养殖过程中发生与工作相关的肌肉骨骼疾病的风险因素。
Int J Occup Environ Med. 2017 Jan;8(1):39-45. doi: 10.15171/ijoem.2017.861.
7
Comparison of Upper Limb Muscle Activity among Workers in Large-Herd U.S. and Small-Herd Italian Dairies.比较大 herd 美国和小 herd 意大利奶牛场工人上肢肌肉活动。
Front Public Health. 2016 Jun 30;4:141. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2016.00141. eCollection 2016.
8
Upper Limb Muscle Activity among Workers in Large-Herd Industrialized Dairy Operations.大型产业化奶牛养殖场工人上肢肌肉活动。
Front Public Health. 2016 Jun 28;4:134. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2016.00134. eCollection 2016.
9
Prevalence and incidence of carpal tunnel syndrome in US working populations: pooled analysis of six prospective studies.美国工作人群中腕管综合征的患病率和发病率:六项前瞻性研究的汇总分析。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2013 Sep 1;39(5):495-505. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3351. Epub 2013 Feb 19.