Department of Pulmonology, Semmelweis University, Diósárok u. 1/c, 1125 Budapest, Hungary.
Sensors (Basel). 2010;10(10):9127-38. doi: 10.3390/s101009127. Epub 2010 Oct 12.
Molecular profiling of exhaled volatile organic compounds (VOC) by electronic nose technology provides breathprints that discriminate between patients with different inflammatory airway diseases, such as asthma and COPD. However, it is unknown whether this is determined by differences in airway caliber. We hypothesized that breathprints obtained by electronic nose are independent of acute changes in airway caliber in asthma. Ten patients with stable asthma underwent methacholine provocation (Visit 1) and sham challenge with isotonic saline (Visit 2). At Visit 1, exhaled air was repetitively collected pre-challenge, after reaching the provocative concentration (PC(20)) causing 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) and after subsequent salbutamol inhalation. At Visit 2, breath was collected pre-challenge, post-saline and post-salbutamol. At each occasion, an expiratory vital capacity was collected after 5 min of tidal breathing through an inspiratory VOC-filter in a Tedlar bag and sampled by electronic nose (Cyranose 320). Breathprints were analyzed with principal component analysis and individual factors were compared with mixed model analysis followed by pairwise comparisons. Inhalation of methacholine led to a 30.8 ± 3.3% fall in FEV(1) and was followed by a significant change in breathprint (p = 0.04). Saline inhalation did not induce a significant change in FEV(1), but altered the breathprint (p = 0.01). However, the breathprint obtained after the methacholine provocation was not significantly different from that after saline challenge (p = 0.27). The molecular profile of exhaled air in patients with asthma is altered by nebulized aerosols, but is not affected by acute changes in airway caliber. Our data demonstrate that breathprints by electronic nose are not confounded by the level of airway obstruction.
电子鼻技术对呼出挥发性有机化合物(VOC)的分子谱分析提供了呼吸特征,可以区分不同炎症性气道疾病(如哮喘和 COPD)患者。然而,尚不清楚这是否是由气道口径的差异决定的。我们假设电子鼻获得的呼吸特征与哮喘急性气道口径变化无关。10 例稳定期哮喘患者接受了乙酰甲胆碱激发试验(第 1 次就诊)和生理盐水假刺激(第 2 次就诊)。在第 1 次就诊时,患者在接受激发前、达到导致第 1 秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)下降 20%的激发浓度(PC20)后以及随后吸入沙丁胺醇后,反复采集呼出气。在第 2 次就诊时,患者在接受激发前、接受生理盐水后和接受沙丁胺醇后采集呼出气。每次就诊时,患者通过吸气 VOC 过滤器在 Tedlar 袋中进行 5 分钟的潮式呼吸后,采集呼气肺活量,然后通过电子鼻(Cyranose 320)进行采样。使用主成分分析分析呼吸特征,并使用混合模型分析比较个体因素,然后进行两两比较。吸入乙酰甲胆碱导致 FEV1 下降 30.8±3.3%,随后呼吸特征发生显著变化(p=0.04)。生理盐水吸入未导致 FEV1 发生显著变化,但改变了呼吸特征(p=0.01)。然而,乙酰甲胆碱激发后的呼吸特征与生理盐水刺激后的呼吸特征无显著差异(p=0.27)。哮喘患者呼出空气中的分子谱受雾化气溶胶影响而发生改变,但不受急性气道口径变化的影响。我们的数据表明,电子鼻的呼吸特征不受气道阻塞程度的影响。