• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

种植体即刻植入即刻修复后,种植体的初始稳定性(即植入时的扭矩)对其长期存留率的影响。

The influence of insertion torque on the survival of immediately placed and restored single-tooth implants.

出版信息

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 Nov-Dec;26(6):1333-43.

PMID:22167441
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the medium- to long-term clinical outcome of single-tooth implants placed into fresh extraction sockets using a low-insertion-torque protocol and immediately restored with acrylic resin provisional crowns.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty-one patients consecutively referred for the replacement of one or more failing teeth were planned for treatment by means of extraction and immediate implant placement and provisionalization using a low-insertion-torque protocol of ≤ 25 Ncm. Low rotational stability was not a contraindication to treatment unless there was a lack of axial stability. Implant survival and marginal bone levels were documented. A statistical analysis was performed to discover any correlations between insertion torque, age, gender, implant size and tooth position and marginal bone loss.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight implants were placed. Three implants failed to osseointegrate; one was replaced and immediately restored and has been successful for more than 5 years. The overall survival rate for all implants was 95.5%, which have been in function for a period of 1.25 to 9.5 years. The mean marginal bone loss of the 54 implants followed for at least 24 months was 0.23 ± 0.60 mm mesially and 0.20 ± 0.72 mm distally. Overall, 78% of implants showed no marginal bone loss, 9% experienced 0.1 to 0.5 mm of bone loss, and 13% demonstrated > 0.5 mm of bone loss. There were no significant correlations between the various parameters analyzed and marginal bone loss.

CONCLUSION

A torque of only 25 Ncm would seem more than sufficient to yield a favorable clinical outcome, and there may be a misconception as to what actually represents adequate primary stability. Immediate provisionalization of single-tooth implants placed with a relatively low insertion torque can yield favorable survival rates and optimal maintenance of marginal bone levels compared to the generally accepted norm.

摘要

目的

本回顾性研究的目的是评估使用低植入扭矩方案将单颗牙种植体植入新鲜拔牙窝中,并使用丙烯酸树脂临时冠即刻修复的中至长期临床效果。

材料与方法

连续 61 名患者因一颗或多颗失败牙齿的替换而被计划接受治疗,方法是采用低植入扭矩方案(≤25 Ncm)进行拔牙和即刻种植体植入及临时修复。低旋转稳定性不是治疗的禁忌症,除非轴向稳定性不足。记录种植体的存活率和边缘骨水平。进行了统计分析,以发现植入扭矩、年龄、性别、种植体尺寸和牙齿位置与边缘骨丢失之间的任何相关性。

结果

共植入 68 颗种植体。有 3 颗种植体未能骨整合,其中 1 颗已更换并立即修复,已成功使用超过 5 年。所有种植体的总体存活率为 95.5%,已使用 1.25 至 9.5 年。至少随访 24 个月的 54 颗种植体的平均边缘骨丢失为近中侧 0.23 ± 0.60mm,远中侧 0.20 ± 0.72mm。总体而言,78%的种植体无边缘骨丢失,9%的种植体边缘骨丢失 0.1 至 0.5mm,13%的种植体边缘骨丢失>0.5mm。分析的各种参数与边缘骨丢失之间均无显著相关性。

结论

仅 25 Ncm 的扭矩似乎足以获得良好的临床效果,并且对于什么是实际代表足够的初始稳定性可能存在误解。与普遍接受的标准相比,使用相对较低的植入扭矩即刻修复单颗牙种植体可获得较高的存活率和最佳的边缘骨水平维持。

相似文献

1
The influence of insertion torque on the survival of immediately placed and restored single-tooth implants.种植体即刻植入即刻修复后,种植体的初始稳定性(即植入时的扭矩)对其长期存留率的影响。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 Nov-Dec;26(6):1333-43.
2
Immediate loading of tapered implants placed in postextraction sockets: retrospective analysis of the 5-year clinical outcome.即刻加载种植体在拔牙窝中的应用:5 年临床结果的回顾性分析。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 Aug;14(4):565-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00297.x. Epub 2010 Jul 17.
3
A short-term clinical evaluation of immediately restored maxillary TiOblast single-tooth implants.上颌TiOblast单颗牙即刻修复种植体的短期临床评估
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004 Mar-Apr;19(2):274-81.
4
Immediate non-occlusal loading of immediate post-extractive versus delayed placement of single implants in preserved sockets of the anterior maxilla: 1-year post-loading outcome of a randomised controlled trial.上颌前部保存牙槽窝内即刻种植体即刻非咬合负重与延期种植的比较:一项随机对照试验的负重后1年结果
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2015 Winter;8(4):361-72.
5
Retrospective clinical evaluation of tapered implants: 10-year follow-up of delayed and immediate placement of maxillary implants.锥形种植体的回顾性临床评估:上颌种植体延期和即刻植入的 10 年随访。
Implant Dent. 2012 Aug;21(4):350-6. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e31825feb16.
6
Immediate loading of post-extractive versus delayed placed single implants in the anterior maxilla: outcome of a pragmatic multicenter randomised controlled trial 1-year after loading.上颌前部拔牙后即刻种植与延期种植单颗种植体的即刻负重:一项实用多中心随机对照试验负重1年后的结果
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2015 Winter;8(4):347-58.
7
Immediate maxillary restoration of single-tooth implants using platform switching for crestal bone preservation: a 12-month study.采用平台转换技术即刻上颌单颗种植体修复以保存牙槽嵴骨:一项为期12个月的研究
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 Mar-Apr;24(2):275-81.
8
Immediate provisionalization of single-tooth implants in fresh-extraction sites at the maxillary esthetic zone: up to 6 years of follow-up.上颌美学区新鲜拔牙位点单颗牙种植体的即刻临时修复:长达6年的随访
Implant Dent. 2009 Aug;18(4):326-33. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e31819ecaaa.
9
Two-year evaluation of a variable-thread tapered implant in extraction sites with immediate temporization: a multicenter clinical trial.种植体即刻临时修复的拔牙位点中使用变螺纹锥形种植体的两年评估:一项多中心临床试验。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 May-Jun;27(3):611-8.
10
Initial torque stability of a new bone condensing dental implant. A cohort study of 140 consecutively placed implants.一种新型骨挤压式牙种植体的初始扭矩稳定性。一项对140颗连续植入种植体的队列研究。
J Oral Implantol. 2009;35(6):277-82. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-09-00020.1.

引用本文的文献

1
Immediate Implant Therapy with Full-Digital Workflow to Replace a Central Incisor.采用全数字化工作流程进行即刻种植治疗以替换一颗中切牙。
Dent J (Basel). 2025 Feb 8;13(2):73. doi: 10.3390/dj13020073.
2
A Retrospective Study Using a Novel Body-Shift Implant Design with a Novel Alloplastic Particulate Grafting Material in Immediate Extraction Sockets.一项回顾性研究:在即刻拔牙窝中使用新型身体移位种植体设计及新型异体颗粒移植材料
Eur J Dent. 2025 Jul;19(3):860-867. doi: 10.1055/s-0045-1801849. Epub 2025 Feb 3.
3
Relevant Aspects of the Dental Implant Design on the Insertion Torque, Resonance Frequency Analysis (RFA) and Micromobility: An In Vitro Study.
牙种植体设计对植入扭矩、共振频率分析(RFA)和微动性的相关影响:一项体外研究
J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 20;12(3):855. doi: 10.3390/jcm12030855.
4
Influence of low insertion torque values on survival rate of immediately loaded dental implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis.低植入扭矩值对即刻负载种植体存活率的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Periodontol. 2023 Feb;50(2):158-169. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13733. Epub 2022 Oct 22.
5
3D Considerations and Outcomes of Immediate Single Implant Insertion and Provisionalization at the Maxillary Esthetic Zone: A Long-Term Retrospective Follow-Up Study of Up to 18 Years.上颌美学区即刻单颗种植体植入与临时修复的三维考量及效果:一项长达18年的长期回顾性随访研究
J Clin Med. 2021 Sep 14;10(18):4138. doi: 10.3390/jcm10184138.
6
The rehabilitation of posterior atrophic maxilla by using the graftless option of short implant versus conventional long implant with sinus graft: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trial.无牙颌后牙槽嵴萎缩的上颌骨采用短种植体与常规长种植体加窦底提升的非骨移植方法修复:一项随机对照临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2021 Jan-Mar;21(1):28-44. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_400_20.
7
Effect of undersized drilling on the stability of immediate tapered implants in the anterior maxillary sector. A randomized clinical trial.小直径预备对上前牙区即刻锥形种植体稳定性的影响:一项随机临床试验。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2021 Mar 1;26(2):e187-e194. doi: 10.4317/medoral.24107.
8
The Bone Buttress Theory: The Effect of the Mechanical Loading of Bone on the Osseointegration of Dental Implants.骨支撑理论:骨的机械负荷对牙种植体骨结合的影响
Biology (Basel). 2020 Dec 28;10(1):12. doi: 10.3390/biology10010012.
9
A Simplified Prosthetic Implant Loading Protocol: 1-Year Clinical Follow-Up Study.一种简化的义齿种植体加载方案:1年临床随访研究。
Int J Dent. 2020 Aug 3;2020:8832500. doi: 10.1155/2020/8832500. eCollection 2020.
10
Healing at implants installed from ~ 70- to < 10-Ncm insertion torques: an experimental study in dogs.植入物安装时的愈合扭矩为~70 至 <10-Ncm:一项犬的实验研究。
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Mar;25(1):55-64. doi: 10.1007/s10006-020-00890-3. Epub 2020 Jul 29.