• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A comparison of accuracy in seating and gap formation for three inlay/onlay techniques.

作者信息

Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E

出版信息

Oper Dent. 1990 Jul-Aug;15(4):129-35.

PMID:2216905
Abstract

The accuracy (fit) of MOD inlays of three brands of composite resin was determined by measuring the axial discrepancy (marginal opening in the approximal area). The axial discrepancy varied between 17 and 121 microns. Directly manufactured inlays were more accurate (axial discrepancy: 17-26 microns) than indirectly manufactured inlays (axial discrepancy: 40-121 microns). Inlays of a microfilled resin, SR-Isosit, were less accurate than inlays of two hybrid materials, Brilliant and Estilux Posterior C VS (axial discrepancy: 121 microns vs 44 and 41 microns respectively). There was a tendency for 24-hour-old inlays to be less accurate than 10-minute-old inlays. The formation of marginal gaps due to contraction of the resin cement was assessed in a light microscope on cemented single-surfaced inlays. Gaps were not formed when enamel margins were etched or dentin margins treated with a dentin-bonding agent of high efficacy. Gaps (2.4-5.6 micron) were formed, however, at untreated dentin margins and at margins treated with dentin-bonding agents of low efficacy.

摘要

相似文献

1
A comparison of accuracy in seating and gap formation for three inlay/onlay techniques.
Oper Dent. 1990 Jul-Aug;15(4):129-35.
2
[A comparison of accuracy in seating and gap formation for three inlay/onlay techniques].[三种嵌体/高嵌体技术在就位精度和间隙形成方面的比较]
Tandlaegebladet. 1991 Apr;95(6):243-6.
3
The effect of a "resin coating" on the interfacial adaptation of composite inlays.“树脂涂层”对复合嵌体界面适应性的影响。
Oper Dent. 2003 Jan-Feb;28(1):28-35.
4
Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.使用不同树脂水门汀和牙本质黏接剂黏固的陶瓷嵌体的微渗漏
J Prosthet Dent. 2009 Oct;102(4):235-41. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60161-X.
5
Interfacial gaps following ceramic inlay cementation vs direct composites.陶瓷嵌体粘结与直接复合树脂修复后的界面间隙
Oper Dent. 2003 Jul-Aug;28(4):445-52.
6
Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.牙本质粘结强度和边缘适应性:直接复合树脂与陶瓷嵌体的比较
Oper Dent. 1999 May-Jun;24(3):147-55.
7
Wear and marginal adaptation of composite resin inlays.
J Prosthet Dent. 1994 Sep;72(3):233-44. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(94)90335-2.
8
[Adaptability of composite resin inlays. 1. Adaptability to the experimental MOD cavity prepared in an acrylic block].[复合树脂嵌体的适应性。1. 对在丙烯酸树脂块中制备的实验性MOD洞形的适应性]
Shika Zairyo Kikai. 1990 Jul;9(4):577-82.
9
[The effect of modified forms of preparation on the quality of SR Isosit composite inlay margins].[制剂改良形式对SR Isosit复合嵌体边缘质量的影响]
Dtsch Zahnarztl Z. 1991 Sep;46(9):611-4.
10
[Retention of composite inlays in enamel-dentin cavities].[复合树脂嵌体在牙釉质-牙本质窝洞中的固位]
Tandlaegebladet. 1991 Aug;95(11):469-72.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical comparison of direct and indirect class II composite restorations: a prospective 12-month follow-up study.II类复合树脂直接修复与间接修复的临床比较:一项为期12个月的前瞻性随访研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 19;25(1):1217. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06604-z.
2
Evaluation of the Bond Strength and Marginal Seal of Indirect Restorations of Composites Bonded with Preheating Resin.预热树脂粘结复合树脂间接修复体的粘结强度及边缘封闭性评估
Eur J Dent. 2020 Oct;14(4):644-650. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1716630. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
3
Indirect composite restorations luted with two different procedures: A ten years follow up clinical trial.
采用两种不同方法粘结的间接复合树脂修复体:一项十年随访临床试验
J Clin Exp Dent. 2015 Feb 1;7(1):e54-9. doi: 10.4317/jced.51604. eCollection 2015 Feb.
4
Comparing the shear bond strength of direct and indirect composite inlays in relation to different surface conditioning and curing techniques.比较直接和间接复合嵌体在不同表面处理和固化技术下的剪切粘结强度。
Eur J Dent. 2013 Oct;7(4):436-441. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.120679.
5
Effects of resin luting agents and 1% NaOCl on the marginal fit of indirect composite restorations in primary teeth.树脂水门汀和 1%次氯酸钠对乳牙间接复合树脂修复体边缘适合性的影响。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2011 Oct;19(5):455-61. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572011000500004.
6
Influence of post-cure treatments on hardness and marginal adaptation of composite resin inlay restorations: an in vitro study.后固化处理对复合树脂嵌体修复体硬度和边缘适应性的影响:一项体外研究。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2009 Nov-Dec;17(6):617-22. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572009000600015.
7
Composite resin fillings and inlays. An 11-year evaluation.复合树脂充填物与嵌体。一项为期11年的评估。
Clin Oral Investig. 2003 Jun;7(2):71-9. doi: 10.1007/s00784-003-0201-z. Epub 2003 May 10.