[Clinical Value of Dual Tracer PET Imaging With Ga-PSMA and F-FDG in Patients With Metastatic Prostate Cancer].

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the imaging characteristics of dual-tracer Ga-prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) and F-flurodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) in metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) patients. We analyzed the uptake modes of the dual tracers, explored clinical pathological parameters affecting the F-FDG uptake in the lesions, and evaluated their prognostic implications for prostate specific antigen progression-free survival (PSA-PFS).

METHODS

A total of 41 mPCa patients who underwent dual-tracer PET/CT (Ga-PSMA and F-FDG) scans between September 2021 and January 2024 were retrospectively enrolled. One patient had negative uptake of both PSMA and FDG. According to the uptake patterns of the 2 tracers, the other patients, 40 in total, were categorized in 2 groups, including group A consisting of 33 cases who showed PSMA and FDG dual and those who showed FDG only avidity, and group B consisting of 7 cases who showed PSMA avidity only. Comparative analyses of clinical pathological characteristics between group A and group B were conducted. The relationship between various parameters and PSA-PFS was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

A total of 26 patients (63.4%) were diagnosed with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), and 38 cases (92.7%) had a Gleason score of 8-9. Bone metastasis, the predominant type of distant metastasis, occurred in 36 cases (87.8%). The skeletal and distant lymph node metastases mostly showed a dual positive uptake pattern for both PSMA and FDG (85.7% [24/28] and 81.8% [9/11]). 37.5% (3/8) of the metastases to organs showed FDG only positive uptake pattern. The serum levels of prostate specific antigen (PSA) in group A were significantly higher than those in group B (=0.013). A total of 13 patients of special pathological classification (intraductal carcinoma and neuroendocrine differentiation) were all found to be in group A. Among the 41 cases, 16 were lost to follow-up. Of the 25 patients who completed follow-up, 9 patients, with a median PSA value of 104 ng/mL, experienced PSA progression, while the 16 other patients, with a median PSA of 0.34 ng/mL, did not incur any PSA progression. There was significant difference in the median PSA between patients showing PSA progression and those who did not show PSA progression (<0.001). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that the median PSA-PFS of patients of specific pathological classifications was 7 months, which was shorter than the 16 months of the patients with typical prostate cancer, with the difference between the two groups being statistically meaningful (=0.043). The median PSA-PFS for group A was 30 months. With more than half of the patients in the group not experiencing any PSA progression, group B did not reach the median PSA-PFS (=0.645).

CONCLUSION

Dual-tracer PET/CT imaging with Ga-PSMA and F-FDG commonly exhibits avidity for both tracers in mPCa. Serum PSA level is a reliable biomarker for predicting FDG-positive lesions. mPCa presented with intraductal carcinoma and neuroendocrine differentiation tends to exhibit FDG avidity and is more susceptible to PSA progression.