Suppr超能文献

随机研究新辅助化疗期间肠内营养支持对食管癌患者化疗相关毒性的临床效果。

Randomized study of clinical effect of enteral nutrition support during neoadjuvant chemotherapy on chemotherapy-related toxicity in patients with esophageal cancer.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

Clin Nutr. 2012 Jun;31(3):330-6. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2011.11.002. Epub 2011 Dec 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Enteral nutrition (EN) is provided for patients with cancer. However, Little is known about the clinical efficacy of EN support during chemotherapy in patients with cancer.

METHODS

Ninety-one patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil, cisplatin and adriamycin) for esophageal cancer were enrolled to receive either EN (n = 47) or PN (n = 44) at random. The primary endpoint was the incidence of chemotherapy-related toxicities during chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Total and dietary intake calories during chemotherapy were equal in the two groups. There were no significant differences in serum albumin level and body weight change after chemotherapy between the two groups. There was no significant difference in tumor response to chemotherapy between the two groups (EN: 51%, PN: 55%, p = 0.886). Leukopenia and neutropenia of grade 3 or 4, defined according to the Common Toxicities Criteria of the National Cancer Institute, were significantly less frequent in the EN group than PN group (leukopenia: 17% vs 41%, p = 0.011, neutropenia: 36% vs 66%, p = 0.005). Lymphopenia and thrombocytopenia tended to be less frequent in the EN group, albeit insignificantly.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with PN support, EN support during neoadjuvant chemotherapy reduced the incidence of chemotherapy-related hematological toxicities in patients with esophageal cancers.

摘要

背景与目的

为癌症患者提供肠内营养(EN)。然而,关于癌症患者化疗期间 EN 支持的临床疗效知之甚少。

方法

本研究纳入 91 例接受新辅助化疗(5-氟尿嘧啶、顺铂和阿霉素)的食管癌患者,随机接受 EN(n = 47)或 PN(n = 44)。主要终点是化疗期间化疗相关毒性的发生率。

结果

两组化疗期间总热量和膳食热量摄入相等。两组化疗后血清白蛋白水平和体重变化无显著差异。两组化疗的肿瘤反应无显著差异(EN:51%,PN:55%,p = 0.886)。根据国立癌症研究所常见毒性标准定义的 3 级或 4 级白细胞减少和中性粒细胞减少,EN 组明显少于 PN 组(白细胞减少:17%比 41%,p = 0.011,中性粒细胞减少:36%比 66%,p = 0.005)。尽管不显著,但 EN 组的淋巴细胞减少和血小板减少倾向于较少发生。

结论

与 PN 支持相比,新辅助化疗期间的 EN 支持可降低食管癌患者化疗相关血液学毒性的发生率。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验