Suppr超能文献

分解急性后期康复护理使用中的种族和民族差异。

Decomposing racial and ethnic disparities in the use of postacute rehabilitation care.

机构信息

Department of Health Policy & Management, Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2012 Jun;47(3 Pt 1):1158-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01363.x. Epub 2011 Dec 15.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the degree to which racial and ethnic disparities in the use of postacute rehabilitation care (PARC) are explained by observed characteristics.

DATA SOURCES

State inpatient databases (SIDs) for 2005 and 2006 from four diverse states were used to identify patients with stays for joint replacement, stroke, or hip fracture.

STUDY DESIGN

Our primary outcomes were use of institutional PARC (versus discharge home) and, conditional on discharge to an institution, skilled nursing facility (versus inpatient rehabilitation facility) care. We modified the Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition method to account for the dichotomous outcome and multilevel nature of the data.

DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Discharges from the four SIDs were included if the principal diagnosis (stroke, hip fracture) or procedure (joint replacement) was in the sample inclusion criteria.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Observed characteristics explained roughly half of the unadjusted differences in use of institutional PARC. Patient-level factors (clinical, age) were more explanatory of disparities in institutional PARC use, while hospital-level factors were more explanatory of skilled nursing facility versus inpatient rehabilitation facility care.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjustment for characteristics influencing PARC use both mitigated and exacerbated racial/ethnic disparities in use. The degree to which the characteristics explained the disparity varied across conditions and outcomes.

摘要

目的

确定观察到的特征在多大程度上解释了急性后期康复治疗(PARC)利用方面的种族和民族差异。

数据来源

使用来自四个不同州的 2005 年和 2006 年的州住院数据库(SID),以确定接受关节置换、中风或髋部骨折治疗的患者。

研究设计

我们的主要结果是利用机构 PARC(而非出院回家),以及在出院到机构的情况下,利用熟练护理设施(而非住院康复设施)进行护理。我们修改了 Oaxaca-Blinder 分解方法,以考虑到二分结果和数据的多层次性质。

数据收集/提取方法:如果主要诊断(中风、髋部骨折)或手术(关节置换)在样本纳入标准内,则将来自四个 SID 的出院纳入研究。

主要发现

观察到的特征解释了未经调整的机构 PARC 利用差异的大约一半。患者层面的因素(临床、年龄)对机构 PARC 利用差异的解释性更强,而医院层面的因素对熟练护理设施与住院康复设施护理的差异的解释性更强。

结论

对影响 PARC 使用的特征进行调整,既减轻了也加剧了种族/民族在 PARC 使用方面的差异。这些特征在多大程度上解释了差异因条件和结果而异。

相似文献

1
Decomposing racial and ethnic disparities in the use of postacute rehabilitation care.分解急性后期康复护理使用中的种族和民族差异。
Health Serv Res. 2012 Jun;47(3 Pt 1):1158-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01363.x. Epub 2011 Dec 15.
3
Postacute rehabilitation care for hip fracture: who gets the most care?髋部骨折的后期康复治疗:谁得到的护理最多?
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012 Oct;60(10):1929-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.04149.x. Epub 2012 Oct 4.
7
Disparities in post-acute rehabilitation care for joint replacement.关节置换术后康复护理的差异。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Jul;63(7):1020-30. doi: 10.1002/acr.20477.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
Race/ethnicity, quality of care, and outcomes in ischemic stroke.种族/民族、护理质量与缺血性脑卒中结局。
Circulation. 2010 Apr 6;121(13):1492-501. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.881490. Epub 2010 Mar 22.
9
Access to postacute rehabilitation.获得急性后期康复服务。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Nov;88(11):1488-93. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.07.023.
10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验