Radiopharmaceutical Laboratory, Nuclear Medicine, Clinical Center, National Cancer Institute/NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Nucl Med Biol. 2012 May;39(4):472-83. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2011.10.020. Epub 2011 Dec 14.
INTRODUCTION: This study was undertaken to investigate the effect of paclitaxel and bevacizumab on the therapeutic efficacy of (90)Y-labeled B3 monoclonal antibody, directed against Le(y) antigen, for the treatment of Le(y)-positive A431 tumors implanted subcutaneously in the right hind flank of nude mice. METHODS: When the tumor size reached ~200 mm(3), the mice received a single dose of intravenous (iv) (90)Y-labeled B3 (60 μCi/150 μg or 100 μCi/150 μg B3), intraperitoneal paclitaxel (40 mg/kg) or iv bevacizumab (5 mg/kg) for monotherapy. To investigate the effect of combined therapies on survival, the mice were treated with two or three agents in the following combinations: (90)Y-B3 on day 0 and paclitaxel on day 1; bevacizumab on -1 day and (90)Y-B3 on day 0; bevacizumab on -1 day and paclitaxel on day 1; bevacizumab, (90)Y-B3 and paclitaxel each at 1-day intervals. The mice with no treatment were used as a control. The tumor volume at 1000 mm(3) was used as a surrogate end point of survival. RESULTS: Compared to control animals, paclitaxel delayed tumor growth with a significantly longer median survival time (P<.001), whereas bevacizumab alone showed a less pronounced effect on a median survival time (P=.18). (90)Y-B3 increased the median survival time in a dose-dependent manner (P<.05). The combined therapy of bevacizumab with paclitaxel produced a trend toward an increase of the median survival time compared to paclitaxel alone (P=.06), whereas bevacizumab combined with (90)Y-B3 showed a statistically insignificant increase in the median survival time compared to (90)Y-B3 alone (P=.25). The tumor sizes of all animals in these groups reached the surrogate end point of survival by day 35. In contrast, the combined therapy involving (90)Y-B3 with paclitaxel showed a striking synergistic effect in shrinking tumors and prolonging the survival time (P<.001); on day 120, three of nine mice (33%) and six of six mice (100%) were alive without tumor when treated with 60 μCi (90)Y-B3 and 100 μCi (90)Y-B3, respectively. The addition of bevacizumab treatment 1 day before the combined therapy of 60 μCi (90)Y-B3 with paclitaxel did not produce a statistically significant increase in survival when compared to the (90)Y-B3 with paclitaxel (P>.10). Fluorescence microscopy analysis indicated that paclitaxel increased, whereas bevacizumab decreased, the accumulation and penetration of Alexa Fluor 647-B3 into tumor microenvironment compared to the control (P<.05). CONCLUSION: Our findings on the paclitaxel effect support a hypothesis that the increased tumor accumulation and penetration of (90)Y-B3 as well as the high radiosensitization of tumor cells by paclitaxel may be the major factors responsible for the synergistic effect of the combined therapy involving (90)Y-B3 with paclitaxel.
简介:本研究旨在探讨紫杉醇和贝伐单抗对(90)Y 标记的 B3 单克隆抗体治疗 Le(y)阳性 A431 肿瘤的疗效的影响,该抗体针对 Le(y)抗原,用于治疗皮下植入裸鼠右后肢的肿瘤。
方法:当肿瘤大小达到约 200mm(3)时,小鼠接受单次静脉注射(iv)(90)Y 标记的 B3(60μCi/150μg 或 100μCi/150μg B3)、腹腔内紫杉醇(40mg/kg)或 iv 贝伐单抗(5mg/kg)进行单药治疗。为了研究联合治疗对生存的影响,将小鼠用以下组合的两种或三种药物进行治疗:(90)Y-B3 于第 0 天,紫杉醇于第 1 天;贝伐单抗于-1 天,(90)Y-B3 于第 0 天;贝伐单抗于-1 天,紫杉醇于第 1 天;贝伐单抗、(90)Y-B3 和紫杉醇每 1 天间隔一次。未接受治疗的小鼠作为对照。肿瘤体积达到 1000mm(3)作为生存的替代终点。
结果:与对照组动物相比,紫杉醇延迟了肿瘤生长,中位生存时间明显延长(P<.001),而贝伐单抗单独使用对中位生存时间的影响较小(P=.18)。(90)Y-B3 以剂量依赖性方式增加中位生存时间(P<.05)。贝伐单抗联合紫杉醇的联合治疗与紫杉醇单药治疗相比,中位生存时间有增加的趋势(P=.06),而贝伐单抗联合(90)Y-B3 与(90)Y-B3 单药治疗相比,中位生存时间无统计学意义的增加(P=.25)。这些组别的所有动物的肿瘤大小均在第 35 天达到生存的替代终点。相比之下,(90)Y-B3 联合紫杉醇的联合治疗在缩小肿瘤和延长生存时间方面显示出显著的协同作用(P<.001);在第 120 天时,用 60μCi(90)Y-B3 和 100μCi(90)Y-B3 治疗的 9 只小鼠中的 3 只(33%)和 6 只小鼠(100%)没有肿瘤存活。与(90)Y-B3 联合紫杉醇相比,贝伐单抗治疗在联合治疗的前一天添加治疗并没有显著增加生存(P>.10)。荧光显微镜分析表明,与对照组相比,紫杉醇增加了 Alexa Fluor 647-B3 在肿瘤微环境中的积累和渗透,而贝伐单抗则减少了其积累和渗透(P<.05)。
结论:我们关于紫杉醇作用的发现支持这样一种假设,即(90)Y-B3 的肿瘤积累和渗透增加以及紫杉醇对肿瘤细胞的高放射增敏性可能是(90)Y-B3 联合紫杉醇联合治疗协同作用的主要因素。
Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2013-12-3
Cancer. 2002-2-15
Cancers (Basel). 2020-5-11
Int J Mol Sci. 2019-11-8
Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019-8
Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016-6
Ann Oncol. 2009-7-16
Mol Cancer Ther. 2008-12