Department of Special Patients, Faculty of Odontology, University of Seville, Spain.
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012 Jul 1;17(4):e569-74. doi: 10.4317/medoral.17848.
There is evidence about a possible relationship existing between periodontal diseases and coronary heart disease. The aim of the present longitudinal study was to investigate the changes in periodontal evolution after etiological periodontal treatment, comparing a healthy control group with another having coronary heart disease.
The study included initially 55 patients of which 44 finished it. They were placed into two groups: Healthy Control Group (HCG) n =9, and Coronary Heart Disease Group (CHDG) n=35. The gingival level (GL), probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), plaque index (PI) and bleeding on probing (BOP) were measured to compare the periodontal status in both groups. The patients were examined and etiological periodontal treatment was performed and they were then examined at the end of 1 and 10 years.
A one way-ANOVA and a MR-ANOVA were established; significance p<0.05.
No significant differences between both groups were detected on the first visit (p>0.5). However, at the second visit the CHDG presented a significantly higher PD (p<0.05) and PI (p<0.01). CHDG patients gradually increase PD through time and in comparison to the control group (p<0.041). CHDG patients present a significantly higher CAL loss (p<0.0385) and a significant increase in PI (p<0.0041) at the end of one year, while on the third visit no significant differences were detected in any of these indices. Likewise, a similar fact can be observed on evaluating BOP at the end of ten years causal treatment, a smaller decrease in the cardiac group was observed in regards to the initial values (p<0.001).
Patients with coronary heart disease showed a worse evolution of periodontal indices than healthy ones, when referring to probing depth, plaque index and bleeding on probing index.
有证据表明牙周病与冠心病之间可能存在关联。本纵向研究的目的是调查病因牙周治疗后牙周变化,比较健康对照组和冠心病组。
该研究最初纳入了 55 名患者,其中 44 名完成了研究。他们被分为两组:健康对照组(HCG)n=9,冠心病组(CHDG)n=35。测量牙龈水平(GL)、探诊深度(PD)、临床附着水平(CAL)、菌斑指数(PI)和探诊出血(BOP),以比较两组的牙周状况。对患者进行检查和病因牙周治疗,然后在 1 年和 10 年后进行检查。
建立了单向方差分析和多向方差分析;显著性 p<0.05。
首次就诊时两组间无显著差异(p>0.5)。然而,第二次就诊时 CHDG 组 PD(p<0.05)和 PI(p<0.01)显著升高。CHDG 患者的 PD 随时间逐渐增加,与对照组相比(p<0.041)。CHDG 患者在一年结束时的 CAL 损失显著增加(p<0.0385),PI 显著增加(p<0.0041),而在第三次就诊时这些指数均无显著差异。同样,在评价十年因果治疗结束时的 BOP 时也可以观察到类似的事实,与初始值相比,心脏组的下降幅度较小(p<0.001)。
与健康对照组相比,冠心病患者的牙周指数恶化更为严重,尤其是在探诊深度、菌斑指数和探诊出血指数方面。