Mc Laughlin Patrick, Neill Siobhan O, Fanning Noel, Mc Garrigle Anne Marie, Connor Owen J O, Wyse Gerry, Maher Michael M
Department of Radiology, Cork University Hospital, Wilton, Cork, Ireland.
Emerg Radiol. 2012 Apr;19(2):127-33. doi: 10.1007/s10140-011-1011-2. Epub 2011 Dec 16.
Tablet devices have recently been used in radiological image interpretation because they have a display resolution comparable to desktop LCD monitors. We identified a need to examine tablet display performance prior to their use in preliminary interpretation of radiological images. We compared the spatial and contrast resolution of a commercially available tablet display with a diagnostic grade 2 megapixel monochrome LCD using a contrast detail phantom. We also recorded reporting discrepancies, using the ACR RADPEER system, between preliminary interpretation of 100 emergency CT brain examinations on the tablet display and formal review on a diagnostic LCD. The iPad display performed inferiorly to the diagnostic monochrome display without the ability to zoom. When the software zoom function was enabled on the tablet device, comparable contrast detail phantom scores of 163 vs 165 points were achieved. No reporting discrepancies were encountered during the interpretation of 43 normal examinations and five cases of acute intracranial hemorrhage. There were seven RADPEER2 (understandable) misses when using the iPad display and 12 with the diagnostic LCD. Use of software zoom in the tablet device improved its contrast detail phantom score. The tablet allowed satisfactory identification of acute CT brain findings, but additional research will be required to examine the cause of "understandable" reporting discrepancies that occur when using tablet devices.
平板电脑设备最近已被用于放射影像解读,因为它们的显示分辨率与台式液晶显示器相当。我们发现在将平板电脑用于放射影像的初步解读之前,有必要检查其显示性能。我们使用对比细节体模,将一款商用平板电脑显示器的空间分辨率和对比度分辨率与一台诊断级200万像素单色液晶显示器进行了比较。我们还使用美国放射学会(ACR)的RADPEER系统,记录了在平板电脑显示器上对100例急诊颅脑CT检查进行初步解读与在诊断级液晶显示器上进行正式复查之间的报告差异。iPad显示器的表现不如诊断级单色显示器,且无法进行缩放。当在平板电脑设备上启用软件缩放功能时,对比细节体模得分相当,分别为163分和165分。在解读43例正常检查和5例急性颅内出血病例时,未发现报告差异。使用iPad显示器时有7例出现RADPEER2(可理解)漏诊,使用诊断级液晶显示器时有12例。在平板电脑设备中使用软件缩放功能提高了其对比细节体模得分。平板电脑能够令人满意地识别颅脑CT的急性病变,但还需要进一步研究,以探究使用平板电脑设备时出现“可理解”报告差异的原因。