Peer Siegfried, Giacomuzzi Salvatore M, Peer Regina, Gassner Eva, Steingruber Iris, Jaschke Werner
Department of Radiology, University Hospital, Anichstrasse 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Eur Radiol. 2003 Feb;13(2):413-7. doi: 10.1007/s00330-002-1479-y. Epub 2002 Jun 14.
With the introduction of digital flat-panel detector systems into clinical practice, the still unresolved question of resolution requirements for picture archiving communication system (PACS) workstation monitors has gained new momentum. This contrast detail analysis was thus performed to define the differences in observer performance in the detection of small low-contrast objects on clinical 1K and 2K monitor workstations. Images of the CDRAD 2.0 phantom were acquired at varying exposures on an indirect-type digital flat-panel detector. Three observers evaluated a total of 15 images each with respect to the threshold contrast for each detail size. The numbers of correctly identified objects were determined for all image subsets. No significant difference in the correct detection ratio was detected among the observers; however, the difference between the two types of workstations (1K vs 2K monitors) despite less than 3% was significant at a 95% confidence level. Slight but statistically significant differences exist in the detection of low-contrast nodular details visualized on 1K- and 2K-monitor workstations. Further work is needed to see if this result holds true also for comparison of clinical flat-panel detector images and may, for example, exert an influence on the diagnostic accuracy of chest X-ray readings.
随着数字平板探测器系统引入临床实践,图像存档与通信系统(PACS)工作站显示器的分辨率要求这一仍未解决的问题有了新的进展。因此进行了这项对比细节分析,以确定在临床1K和2K显示器工作站上检测小的低对比度物体时观察者表现的差异。在间接型数字平板探测器上以不同曝光获取CDRAD 2.0体模的图像。三名观察者针对每个细节尺寸的阈值对比度对总共15幅图像进行了评估。确定了所有图像子集正确识别的物体数量。观察者之间未检测到正确检测率的显著差异;然而,两种类型的工作站(1K与2K显示器)之间的差异尽管小于3%,但在95%置信水平下具有显著性。在1K和2K显示器工作站上可视化的低对比度结节细节的检测存在轻微但具有统计学显著性的差异。需要进一步研究以确定该结果对于临床平板探测器图像的比较是否也成立,例如,这是否可能对胸部X线读数的诊断准确性产生影响。