Jansen Carl-Philipp, Claßen Katrin, Wahl Hans-Werner, Hauer Klaus
Department of Psychological Aging Research, Institute of Psychology, Heidelberg University, Bergheimer Str. 20, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany.
Department of Geriatric Research, Agaplesion Bethanien Hospital, Geriatric Center at Heidelberg University, Rohrbacher Str. 149, 69126 Heidelberg, Germany.
Eur J Ageing. 2015 May 8;12(3):261-271. doi: 10.1007/s10433-015-0344-1. eCollection 2015 Sep.
The aim of this review was to evaluate current evidence regarding the effects of interventions on physical activity in the subgroup of nursing home residents as well as to critically review the assessment methods used in this regard. Published studies through January 2015 were searched in The Cochrane Library, PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Knowledge, PsycInfo, Psyndex, Psycarticles, CC Med, and DissOnline; and by manual search. For randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to be included, an intervention had to be conducted with nursing home residents aged 65 years and above and physical activity had to be assessed using standardized, quantitative methods. Study quality was evaluated using an established Cochrane rating tool for RCTs. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. Only one intervention study with main focus on a modification of physical activity behavior could be identified. Physical activity assessments used in the studies were partly limited regarding objectivity or psychometric quality. Hence, the documentation of effects of interventions is restricted. Six studies reported significant increases of physical activity in nursing home residents and thus positive intervention effects, which points at the feasibility and high potential of intervention programs to promote physical activity in this setting. Enhanced individual contact as well as physical exercise combined with behavioral interventions and the inclusion of nursing staff seems to be most effective in this regard. As only one study involved post-intervention follow-up assessments, sustainability of effects remained unclear.
本综述的目的是评估当前关于干预措施对养老院居民身体活动影响的证据,并严格审查这方面使用的评估方法。通过在考克兰图书馆、PubMed、CINAHL、知识网络、PsycInfo、Psyndex、Psycarticles、CC Med和DissOnline中检索以及手动检索,查找截至2015年1月发表的研究。纳入的随机对照试验(RCT)必须是针对65岁及以上的养老院居民进行的干预,且必须使用标准化的定量方法评估身体活动。使用既定的考克兰RCT评级工具评估研究质量。八项研究符合纳入标准。仅能确定一项主要关注身体活动行为改变的干预研究。研究中使用的身体活动评估在客观性或心理测量质量方面存在一定限制。因此,干预效果的记录受到限制。六项研究报告称养老院居民的身体活动显著增加,从而表明干预效果积极,这表明干预项目在促进该环境下的身体活动方面具有可行性和巨大潜力。在这方面,加强个人接触以及将体育锻炼与行为干预相结合并纳入护理人员似乎最为有效。由于只有一项研究涉及干预后的随访评估,效果的可持续性仍不明确。