Miller Chad M, Palestrant David
Department of Neurosurgery at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, United States.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2012 Jul;114(6):545-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2011.11.024. Epub 2011 Dec 15.
Many neuromonitoring devices provide data applicable to a limited region of the brain. Risk of DIND is common after aSAH and may occur near or remote from the ruptured aneurysm. The aim of this study is to determine the distribution of DIND after aneurysms rupture as it relates to the potential value of regional monitoring in detection of vasospasm.
The study enrolled aSAH patients presenting to a tertiary referral center over a three year period who received treatment for an identified ruptured aneurysm and survived >10 days with subsequent DIND. Only those patients receiving routine neuroimaging were included. To account for the anticipated effect on infarct distribution, patients were divided into groups of midline and non-midline aneurysms and assessed for vasospasm and stroke with respect to vascular distribution. Comparisons of clinical characteristics were made to determine factors predisposing to remote infarction.
Twenty-nine patients met criteria with 15 patients harboring non-midline aneurysms. The rarity of isolated remote DIND prohibited adequate assessment of predictive clinical characteristics. For non-midline aneurysms, DIND occurred ipsilateral to the ruptured aneurysm in 93% and within the same vascular territory in 86% of patients. Midline anterior circulation aneurysms frequently resulted in ACA infarction. A neuromonitoring device with 100% sensitivity for ischemia placed in the MCA territory ipsilateral to a non-midline ruptured aneurysm would identify 71% of DIND.
Vasospasm related infarction occurs most commonly ipsilateral to or in the same distribution of the ruptured aneurysm. Less anatomical correlation is seen with midline aneurysms. Rupture of posterior circulation aneurysms infrequently results in supratentorial infarction. Decisions regarding placement of regional monitors for the purpose of vasospasm detection should consider this distribution of ischemic risk.
许多神经监测设备提供的数据仅适用于大脑的有限区域。动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(aSAH)后迟发性缺血性神经功能障碍(DIND)很常见,可能发生在破裂动脉瘤附近或远处。本研究的目的是确定动脉瘤破裂后DIND的分布情况,及其与区域监测在检测血管痉挛方面潜在价值的关系。
本研究纳入了在三年期间到三级转诊中心就诊的aSAH患者,这些患者接受了已确诊破裂动脉瘤的治疗,存活超过10天且随后发生了DIND。仅纳入那些接受常规神经影像学检查的患者。为了考虑对梗死分布的预期影响,将患者分为中线动脉瘤组和非中线动脉瘤组,并就血管分布评估血管痉挛和中风情况。对临床特征进行比较以确定易导致远处梗死的因素。
29例患者符合标准,其中15例患有非中线动脉瘤。孤立性远处DIND的罕见性使得无法充分评估预测性临床特征。对于非中线动脉瘤,93%的患者DIND发生在破裂动脉瘤的同侧,86%的患者发生在同一血管区域内。中线前循环动脉瘤常导致大脑前动脉(ACA)梗死。将对缺血具有100%敏感性的神经监测设备放置在非中线破裂动脉瘤同侧的大脑中动脉(MCA)区域,可识别71%的DIND。
与血管痉挛相关的梗死最常发生在破裂动脉瘤的同侧或同一分布区域。中线动脉瘤的解剖相关性较小。后循环动脉瘤破裂很少导致幕上梗死。关于为检测血管痉挛而放置区域监测设备的决策应考虑这种缺血风险分布。