群体动力在科学不一致中的作用：以一个研究联盟为例。
The role of group dynamics in scientific inconsistencies: a case study of a research consortium.
机构信息
Interdisciplinary Center for Psychiatric Epidemiology and Graduate School of Medical Sciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
出版信息
PLoS Med. 2011 Dec;8(12):e1001143. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001143. Epub 2011 Dec 13.
Abstract
Judith Rosmalen and Albertine Oldehinkel describe their experience in the TRAILS research consortium to discuss why research teams might publish contradictory or inconsistent results despite procedures to avoid this; they emphasize the role of internal group dynamics rather than faulty publication practices.
摘要
朱迪斯·罗斯马伦和艾伯特茵·奥德亨克尔描述了他们在 TRAILS 研究联盟中的经验，以探讨为什么尽管有避免这种情况的程序，研究团队仍可能发表相互矛盾或不一致的结果；他们强调了内部团队动态的作用，而不是有缺陷的出版实践。
Zotero 插件