• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重新审视特定群体强制性福利的效率:强制性不孕福利的影响。

The efficiency of a group-specific mandated benefit revisited: the effect of infertility mandates.

机构信息

Texas A&M University, Bush School, College Station, TX 77843-4220, USA.

出版信息

J Policy Anal Manage. 2012 Winter;31(1):63-92. doi: 10.1002/pam.20616.

DOI:10.1002/pam.20616
PMID:22180892
Abstract

This paper examines the labor market effects of state health insurance mandates that increase the cost of employing a demographically identifiable group. State mandates requiring that health insurance plans cover infertility treatment raise the relative cost of insuring older women of child-bearing age. Empirically, wages in this group are unaffected, but their total labor input decreases. Workers do not value infertility mandates at cost, and so will not take wage cuts in exchange, leading employers to decrease their demand for this affected and identifiable group. Differences in the empirical effects of mandates found in the literature are explained by a model including variations in the elasticity of demand, moral hazard, ability to identify a group, and adverse selection.

摘要

本文考察了州医疗保险法规对劳动力市场的影响,这些法规增加了雇佣特定人群的成本。要求医疗保险计划覆盖不孕治疗的州法规提高了为育龄老年女性投保的相对成本。从经验上看,这一群体的工资没有受到影响,但他们的总劳动投入减少了。工人不会按成本来衡量不孕法规的价值,因此也不会接受减薪来换取不孕法规,这导致雇主减少了对这一受影响且可识别群体的需求。文献中发现的法规的实证影响存在差异,其原因是模型中包含了需求弹性、道德风险、识别群体的能力和逆向选择等因素的变化。

相似文献

1
The efficiency of a group-specific mandated benefit revisited: the effect of infertility mandates.重新审视特定群体强制性福利的效率:强制性不孕福利的影响。
J Policy Anal Manage. 2012 Winter;31(1):63-92. doi: 10.1002/pam.20616.
2
State trends in the cost of employer health insurance coverage, 2003-2013.2003 - 2013年雇主医疗保险覆盖成本的州趋势
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2015 Jan;1:1-22.
3
The Consequences of the Growth of Health Insurance Premiums.医疗保险费增长的后果。
Am Econ Rev. 2005 May;95(2):214-8. doi: 10.1257/000282805774670121.
4
Labor market effects of the Massachusetts health insurance reform.马萨诸塞州医疗保险改革对劳动力市场的影响。
Natl Bur Econ Res Bull Aging Health. 2012(2):2-3.
5
The incidence of mandated maternity benefits.法定产假福利的发生率。
Am Econ Rev. 1994 Jun;84(3):622-41.
6
Employer-sponsored health insurance and mandated benefit laws.雇主提供的健康保险和强制福利法。
Milbank Q. 1999;77(4):425-59. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.00147.
7
Unmet financial burden of infertility care and the impact of state insurance mandates in the United States: analysis from a popular crowdfunding platform.未满足的不孕不育治疗经济负担以及美国国家保险强制要求的影响:来自热门众筹平台的分析。
Fertil Steril. 2021 Oct;116(4):1119-1125. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.05.111. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
8
The price of state mandated benefits.国家规定福利的代价。
Inquiry. 1989 Winter;26(4):419-31.
9
Heterogeneity and the effect of mental health parity mandates on the labor market.心理健康平价授权的异质性及其对劳动力市场的影响。
J Health Econ. 2015 Sep;43:74-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2015.06.008. Epub 2015 Jul 8.
10
Contraception compromise: questions unanswered on how plan will work.避孕措施存疑:该计划如何实施仍有诸多问题未得到解答。
Mod Healthc. 2012 Feb 13;42(7):8-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of in vitro fertilization state mandates for third party insurance coverage in the United States: a review and critical assessment.美国体外受精州立保险覆盖 mandate 的影响:综述与批判性评估。
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2022 Aug 4;20(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12958-022-00984-5.
2
Heterogeneity and the effect of mental health parity mandates on the labor market.心理健康平价授权的异质性及其对劳动力市场的影响。
J Health Econ. 2015 Sep;43:74-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2015.06.008. Epub 2015 Jul 8.