Suppr超能文献

在乌干达实施快速诊断检测和显微镜检查进行寄生虫病诊断疟疾的比较可行性。

Comparative feasibility of implementing rapid diagnostic test and microscopy for parasitological diagnosis of malaria in Uganda.

机构信息

Department of Community Health, Mbarara University of Science & Technology, P.O. Box 1410, Mbarara, Uganda.

出版信息

Malar J. 2011 Dec 19;10:373. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-10-373.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In Uganda, parasite-based diagnosis is recommended for every patient suspected to have malaria before prescribing anti-malarials. However, the majority of patients are still treated presumptively especially in low-level health units. The feasibility of implementing parasite-based diagnosis for uncomplicated malaria in rural health centres (HCs) was investigated with a view to recommending measures for scaling up the policy.

METHODS

Thirty HCs were randomized to implement parasite-based diagnosis based on rapid diagnostic tests [RDTs] (n = 10), blood microscopy (n = 10) and presumptive diagnosis (control arm) (n = 10). Feasibility was assessed by comparing the proportion of patients who received parasite-based diagnosis; with a positive malaria parasite-based diagnosis who received artemether-lumefantrine (AL); with a negative malaria parasite-based diagnosis who received AL; and patient waiting time. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00565071.

RESULTS

102, 087 outpatients were enrolled. Patients were more likely to be tested in the RDT 44, 565 (96.6%) than in microscopy arm 19, 545 (60.9%) [RR: 1.59]. RDTs reduced patient waiting time compared to microscopy and were more convenient to health workers and patients. Majority 23, 804 (99.7%) in presumptive arm were prescribed AL. All (100%) of patients who tested positive for malaria in RDT and microscopy arms were prescribed anti-malarials. Parasitological-based diagnosis significantly reduced AL prescription in RDT arm [RR: 0.62] and microscopy arm [RR: 0.72] compared to presumptive treatment. Among patients not tested in the two intervention arms, 12, 044 (96.1%) in microscopy and 965 (61.6%) in RDT arm were treated with AL [RR: 1.56]. Overall 10, 558 (29.4%) with negative results [5, 110 (23.4%) in RDT and 5, 448 (39.0%) in microscopy arms] were prescribed AL.

CONCLUSION

It was more feasible to implement parasite-based diagnosis for malaria using RDT than with microscopy. A high proportion of patients with negative malaria results are still prescribed anti-malarials. There is need to increase access to parasite-based diagnosis where microscopy is used. In order to fully harness the benefits of parasitological confirmation of malaria, it is necessary to reduce the prescription of anti-malarials in negative patients.

摘要

背景

在乌干达,建议对每一位疑似疟疾的患者在开具抗疟药物之前进行寄生虫诊断。然而,大多数患者仍采用经验性治疗,尤其是在低级别卫生机构。本研究旨在评估在农村卫生中心实施简易型疟疾寄生虫诊断的可行性,以期为政策的推广提供建议。

方法

将 30 个卫生中心随机分为三组:基于快速诊断检测(RDT)(n = 10)、血涂片检查(n = 10)和经验性诊断(对照组,n = 10)的寄生虫诊断组。通过比较寄生虫诊断的患者比例、寄生虫阳性的疟疾患者接受青蒿琥酯-甲氟喹(AL)治疗的比例、寄生虫阴性的疟疾患者接受 AL 治疗的比例以及患者的等候时间来评估可行性。临床试验注册:NCT00565071。

结果

共纳入 102545 名门诊患者。RDT 组有 44565 名(96.6%)患者接受了检测,而显微镜组有 19545 名(60.9%)患者接受了检测[RR:1.59]。RDT 组与显微镜组相比,患者的等候时间更短,且更便于医护人员和患者使用。在经验性治疗组中,23804 名(99.7%)患者开具了 AL。RDT 和显微镜检测阳性的所有患者均开具了抗疟药物。寄生虫诊断显著减少了 RDT 组[RR:0.62]和显微镜组[RR:0.72]的 AL 处方。在未接受两种干预措施的患者中,显微镜组有 12044 名(96.1%)患者和 RDT 组有 965 名(61.6%)患者接受了 AL 治疗[RR:1.56]。总共有 10558 名(29.4%)患者的检测结果为阴性[RDT 组 5110 名(23.4%),显微镜组 5448 名(39.0%)],他们仍开具了 AL。

结论

与显微镜检查相比,RDT 更适用于寄生虫诊断。仍有很大一部分寄生虫阴性的患者开具了抗疟药物。需要增加寄生虫诊断的可及性,特别是在使用显微镜检查的地方。为了充分利用寄生虫确认疟疾的益处,有必要减少阴性患者的抗疟药物处方。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e008/3269399/7e9a24ec8b7f/1475-2875-10-373-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验