• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估针对高中阅读困难学生的补救措施的效果。

Evaluating the efficacy of remediation for struggling readers in high school.

作者信息

Lovett Maureen W, Lacerenza Léa, De Palma Maria, Frijters Jan C

机构信息

The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada Toronto Catholic District School Board, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

J Learn Disabil. 2012 Mar-Apr;45(2):151-69. doi: 10.1177/0022219410371678. Epub 2011 Dec 19.

DOI:10.1177/0022219410371678
PMID:22183192
Abstract

Preliminary efficacy data are reported for a research-based reading intervention designed for struggling readers in high school. PHAST PACES teaches (a) word identification strategies, (b) knowledge of text structures, and (c) reading comprehension strategies. In a quasi-experimental design, 268 intervention and 83 waiting list control students meeting criteria for reading disability were assessed before and after their semester. After 60 to 70 hours of PHAST PACES instruction, struggling readers demonstrated significant gains on standardized tests of word attack, word reading, and passage comprehension and on experimental measures of letter-sound knowledge and multisyllabic word identification relative to control students. An average effect size of .68 was revealed across these outcome measures. One year follow-up data on 197 PHAST PACES students revealed an average trend to decelerated growth after the intervention, except for passage comprehension outcomes that demonstrated continued growth over follow-up.

摘要

本文报告了一项针对高中阅读困难学生设计的基于研究的阅读干预措施的初步疗效数据。PHAST PACES教授:(a)单词识别策略;(b)文本结构知识;(c)阅读理解策略。在一项准实验设计中,268名接受干预的学生和83名符合阅读障碍标准的候补名单对照学生在学期前后接受了评估。经过60至70小时的PHAST PACES教学后,阅读困难的学生在单词攻击、单词阅读和篇章理解的标准化测试以及字母发音知识和多音节单词识别的实验测试中,相对于对照学生表现出显著进步。这些结果测量的平均效应大小为0.68。对197名PHAST PACES学生的一年随访数据显示,干预后除篇章理解结果在随访中持续增长外,平均呈现增长减速趋势。

相似文献

1
Evaluating the efficacy of remediation for struggling readers in high school.评估针对高中阅读困难学生的补救措施的效果。
J Learn Disabil. 2012 Mar-Apr;45(2):151-69. doi: 10.1177/0022219410371678. Epub 2011 Dec 19.
2
Putting struggling readers on the PHAST track: a program to integrate phonological and strategy-based remedial reading instruction and maximize outcomes.让阅读困难的学生走上PHAST之路:一项整合语音和基于策略的阅读补救教学并最大化教学成果的计划。
J Learn Disabil. 2000 Sep-Oct;33(5):458-76. doi: 10.1177/002221940003300507.
3
Replication of an Experimental Study Investigating the Efficacy of a Multisyllabic Word Reading Intervention With and Without Motivational Beliefs Training for Struggling Readers.一项实验研究的复制,该研究调查了针对阅读困难者的多音节词阅读干预措施,以及是否结合动机信念训练的效果。
J Learn Disabil. 2019 Jan/Feb;52(1):45-58. doi: 10.1177/0022219418775114. Epub 2018 May 17.
4
Evaluating the Impact of a Multistrategy Inference Intervention for Middle-Grade Struggling Readers.评估针对中等年级阅读困难读者的多策略推理干预措施的影响。
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2017 Jan 1;48(1):31-41. doi: 10.1044/2016_LSHSS-16-0041.
5
Efficacy of a Word- and Text-Based Intervention for Students With Significant Reading Difficulties.基于词汇和文本的干预对有显著阅读困难的学生的疗效。
J Learn Disabil. 2019 Jan/Feb;52(1):31-44. doi: 10.1177/0022219418775113. Epub 2018 May 23.
6
Computerized trainings in four groups of struggling readers: Specific effects on word reading and comprehension.针对四组阅读困难者的计算机化训练:对单词阅读和阅读理解的特定影响。
Res Dev Disabil. 2015 Oct-Nov;45-46:83-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2015.07.016. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
7
Evaluation of the benefits of assistive reading software: perceptions of high school students with learning disabilities.评估辅助阅读软件的效益:学习障碍高中生的看法。
Assist Technol. 2011 Winter;23(4):199-204. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2011.614673.
8
Reading research for students with LD: a meta-analysis of intervention outcomes.针对学习障碍学生的阅读研究:干预结果的元分析
J Learn Disabil. 1999 Nov-Dec;32(6):504-32. doi: 10.1177/002221949903200605.
9
Computer-assisted remedial reading intervention for school beginners at risk for reading disability.计算机辅助补救性阅读干预对有阅读障碍风险的学校初学者的帮助。
Child Dev. 2011 May-Jun;82(3):1013-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01580.x. Epub 2011 Mar 18.
10
A comparison of two reading interventions for children with reading disabilities.针对阅读障碍儿童的两种阅读干预方法的比较。
J Learn Disabil. 2000 May-Jun;33(3):257-77. doi: 10.1177/002221940003300304.

引用本文的文献

1
Targeted school-based interventions for improving reading and mathematics for students with, or at risk of, academic difficulties in Grades 7-12: A systematic review.针对7至12年级有学习困难或有学习困难风险的学生提高阅读和数学能力的校本干预措施:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 1;16(2):e1081. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1081. eCollection 2020 Jun.
2
Identification of brain cell types underlying genetic association with word reading and correlated traits.鉴定与单词阅读和相关特征存在遗传关联的脑细胞类型。
Mol Psychiatry. 2023 Apr;28(4):1719-1730. doi: 10.1038/s41380-023-01970-y. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
3
Response to intervention for high school students: examining baseline word reading skills and reading comprehension outcomes.
高中学生的干预反应:考察基线单词阅读技能和阅读理解结果。
Ann Dyslexia. 2022 Jul;72(2):324-340. doi: 10.1007/s11881-022-00253-5. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
4
Phonics training for English-speaking poor readers.针对说英语的阅读障碍者的自然拼读法训练。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 14;11(11):CD009115. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009115.pub3.
5
Literacy promotion by health care professionals: A comprehensive biomedical and psychosocial approach.医护人员的扫盲促进:一种全面的生物医学和社会心理方法。
Paediatr Child Health. 2018 Feb;23(1):6-11. doi: 10.1093/pch/pxx143. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
6
A Century of Progress: Reading Interventions for Students in Grades 4-12, 1914-2014.一个世纪的进步:1914 - 2014年针对4至12年级学生的阅读干预措施
Rev Educ Res. 2016 Sep;86(3):756-800. doi: 10.3102/0034654316652942. Epub 2016 Jul 9.
7
Evidence-Based Reading and Writing Assessment for Dyslexia in Adolescents and Young Adults.青少年和青年成人阅读障碍的循证读写能力评估
Learn Disabil (Pittsbg). 2016;21(1):38-56. doi: 10.18666/LDMJ-2016-V21-I1-6971.
8
A Meta-Analysis of Interventions for Struggling Readers in Grades 4-12: 1980-2011.对4至12年级阅读困难学生干预措施的元分析:1980年至2011年
J Learn Disabil. 2015 Jul-Aug;48(4):369-90. doi: 10.1177/0022219413504995. Epub 2013 Oct 3.